kafka said:
Another source would be look at contemporary Japan...what always struck me about the Aslan was it was more Japonese (Japan viewed through Western eyes) rather than a true representation of Japan in all of its complexity.
I don't know, the view that, "they are tough warrior types, therefore they must be like samurai," is getting to be a cliche, not just in Traveller but in SF generally. Well, either samurai or klingons.
Aslan are more concerned with territory than cultural acceptance AFAIK. OTOH, you reference modern (early 21stC Japan).
I like the idea that the Aslan could be, like modern Japan, the big-swinging-d***s (not my phrase) of the business world as well as inheriting the martial background.
However, the concept that
warriors are somehow more honourable and hence better than
soldiers is also fast becoming cliche. There are many historical examples of warriors essentially sacrificing their cause, their people, even their families to gain personal honour; beaten by soldiers who sacrifice personal honour for survival of the group.[/rant]
Perhaps the martial aspect of Aslan culture could be modelled on the pre-WWI Prussian concept of professionalism. I could see Aslan loyalty to the clan working this way, even as the concept of
clan evolves with population and technology.
In fact, the more I think of it, the more it makes sense (at least in MTU):
Aslan are agressive and territorial, hence the martial aspects to their culture. OTOH, they're not dumb. They would realise that success would be tied to slightly re-defining territory to account for personal/clan/culture/race ambitions, so where an individual would compete within his clan for personal territory, he would also compete as part of his clan against others to increase clan territory.
OTGH, I could be wrong.
