Imperial Regional Cultures and Books Detailing Them: Continuation Thread

actionman

Cosmic Mongoose
This thread is for discussion of what we'd like to see for Mongoose books detailing the regional human cultures of the Imperium, especially Vilani culture and it's regional variations. This isn't a thread for discussing our various IMTU head canon, although ideas are welcome, it's for discussing what we'd like Mongoose to publish official Traveller books about.

Here's the original post from the Future of Traveller thread.

As for Traveller books, I'd like to see a book detailing the cultures of the Imperium, like Alien Modules but for the human regional cultures inside the Imperium. I read the Third Imperium book, but it didn't provide enough information.

I'd like something like this because I have trouble knowing how and why to play an Imperial character (or K'Kree, Hiver, or Zhodani, but I don't bother with them).

Please don't tell me to go the IMTU route because that fragments people's understanding of what is true in the baseline official setting. If I go to play Traveller at my FLGS or if a new player sits down at my table, it's important to have an official baseline as a foundation before making changes.

Anyway, the Solomani have their ideology and their opposition to the Imperium, and they're from Earth so we have a good idea how to play them (any setting appropriate version of an Earth culture). The Vargr have their charisma dynamics and their wolf-related cultural traits, the Aslan have their honor, clan system, gender dynamics, and desire for land, but what do the Vilani and their derivative Imperial cultures have?

The Vilani are the majority population in the Imperium, but we don't know much about them. Do they value honor, truth, and justice, or is corruption a normal part of doing business? Is consideration of others a value in Vilani culture, or is it more about nice guys finish last? In Vilani culture, what is the relationship of the individual to his family, his neighbors, his society, and the state? What can my character expect, and how should he behave, when he arrives at an average culturally-Vilani world? What is interesting about culturally-Vilani people that would motivate me or the players at my table to want to play Vilani characters? What is the Vilani aesthetic? The answers to these questions are what I would like to see in the kind of books I'm suggesting. This is important because what I've noticed in my experience is that people play every type of character besides ordinary "Imperials", and when they do, their characters are "normal contemporary people in space", so to speak. Also, the DGP books are long out of print, and in my opinion no longer relevant. I want books about this written by Mongoose for the Mongoose Traveller setting.

I doubt very much that the influx of Terrans during the Rule of Man or the influx of Sylean "Solomani" during the Consolidation Wars would do much to change the demographics of the 10,000 worlds. Their cultural and technical innovations would most likely have a great impact after the Long Night, but these changes would add to and not eliminate a population's sense of who they are and how they've interacted with each other for at least 1000 years.

I'd like to see books that illuminate the various human cultures of the Imperium so that every one of those cultures provide interesting compelling reasons (this is who I am, this is my way of life, this is how to behave correctly in my society, etc.) to play characters of those cultures. I've noticed that without those reasons, players tend to default to no characterization at all and a lack of interest. It would be great to have interesting plausible conflicts between those regional Imperial cultures, so Imperial characters could have differing viewpoints.


I'd like to see "alien modules" for the various human cultures of the Imperium to make playing Imperial characters a more compelling option for players and to give more depth to the Imperial part of the setting. The Imperium is the star of the Traveller Charted Space setting, and IMO it needs much more development.

I think the problem is akin to trying to play an rpg in which the main empire of the setting is the British Empire, but then not defining the cultures within that empire, and stating that everyone in the British Empire considers themselves "Imperial", even though the majority of the population of the British Empire is not British. Why would someone play a bland "Imperial" character, when that player could play a rebellious self-reliant American, a militaristic industrious Prussian, an honorable Japanese warrior, a wise traditional Ottoman, or a fierce adventurous Zulu?

Let me rephrase that question in Traveller terms: Why would someone play a bland undefined "Imperial" instead of a rebellious, militaristic, ideological, adventurous Solomani, a wise peaceful yet relentless Zhodani, a fierce confrontational honor-obsessed Sword Worlder, an honorable warlike land-hungry Aslan, an adventurous volatile glory-seeking Vargr, a psychotic Tezcat, or any of more characterized races in Charted Space? These characterizations allow players to choose which character races appeal to them for the particular characters they're thinking about, and the Imperium doesn't have these.

GDW went for a deliberately homogenous Imperium in the Classic Traveller books, and once stated that people in the Imperium think of themselves as "Imperial", but never defined what Imperial culture was or what being "Imperial" meant in people's lives. I find it highly implausible that people would think of themselves as "Imperial", because:
  • There would be no mass media norming effect beyond the planetary or star system level (since comms only travel at J6),
  • Imperial populations live on isolated worlds that take expensive weeks-long ship journeys to get to instead of being able to drive across the entire Imperium in a few days,
  • And most importantly, the Imperium rules the "space between the stars" and doesn't impose any particular way of life on its member worlds.

This state of affairs would greatly facilitate cultural and linguistic drift. But what would cultures and languages be drifting from? That was never explained. DGP made an attempt with their Vilani & Vargr book, but IMO that book isn't relevant anymore. I think we need a new Mongoose-specific definition of what it means to be a human of the cultures of the Imperium.

What are the base cultures of the Imperium?
  • Vilani, the majority population of the Imperium by far (unless stated otherwise Mongoose canon sources).
  • Imperial Solomani, originating from remnant populations left in the former Ziru Sirka after the collapse of the Rule of Man, who I think after 1000 years of the Long Night, would be culturally and linguistically unrecognizable to the Solomani of the Solomani Sphere.
  • The remnant populations of pocket empires, but even they were descended from Vilani, RoM Solomani, minor human races, or any combination thereof.
The cultures of these people need to be defined and characterized so that players can find appeal in them and GMs can rp them consistently. Another important reason for a firm baseline foundation is so GMs can have a starting place for figuring out how particular worlds and environments might change them.

Feel free to discuss what you would like to see for books like this.
 
Comments from @Vormaerin :

https://forum.mongoosepublishing.co...ed-the-future-of-traveller.123226/post-988558

There is no galactic internet. There's no mass Imperium cultural memes. The Imperium is 11, 000 planets that have trade links with each other. Yes, the Vilani have an outsize influence because they got space travel first. But that was 3000 years ago. Cultures change a bit in that time. The Romans and Greeks had a lot of impact on European culture, but no one today is Roman or Classical Greek culture. And the Third Imperium actually grew out of the Sylean Federation.

The Third Imperium does not directly manage planets so most planets have their own culture with some Imperium sprinkles on top. Asking what the culture of the Third Imperium is makes little more sense than asking what the culture of Earth is.

I love reading about interesting, well thought out cultures, don't get me wrong. But there's thousands of cultures in the Imperium. Just consider the difference between English, Australian, and US cultures and that's only a couple hundred years of drift on the same planet.

Put completely different planets, hundreds to thousands of years of evolution, and you are going to have significant drift. Add in that there are dozens of worlds with human or other sophonts "native" to them adding even more complexity.
 
Problem 1 with the Vilani.
DGP
Problem 2 with the Vilani.
authors not looking at their history and noticing key things
Problem 3 with the Vilani.
Imperial China tropes
Problem 4 with the Vilani
many people think it was in their nature to become technologically stagnant, I refer back to point 2.

I quite like the idea of looking at the various hominid "species" we know existed 300,000 years ago and base the various human "minor" races from those different branches of humanity.

Have there ever been any threads where the different Third Imperium era minor human races have been linked with the human species that are known to have existed 300,000 or so years ago -- sapiens, neanderthals, erectus, hobbits (floresiensis), and denisovans - to name the ones I can remember without looking them up.

Back to the Vilani - which human species were they?

Overlooked Zhodani facts.
The Ancients transplanted a species of humans. This species evolved into two new "species", the hybidisation and contused evolution produced modern Zhodani.
 
The 'Imperial Standard' culture is strictly among Travellers... those who leave their homeworlds for a life offworld. Imperial Standard is the kind of architecture, advertising, and art motifs one might see in a Class A Highport that gets a lot of traffic, or perhaps in the offices of an Imperial Consulate or other official building. Even the Imperial military has cultures that differ from the 'standard' and each Megacorp has its own style.
Other than these specific instances, art, culture, architecture, etc. are all regional at best and most often unique to the specific world.
 
I thought one of the complaints of the Solomani was that Imperial culture was bland homogenized megacorped sameness. Of course, if all you see are starports and holovids, you might think the same...
Not sure that DGP is a problem for the Vilani, though to believe that any one culture has remained the same for ten thousand years, is an oversimplification. I liked the GURPS:ISW look at Vilani culture (Where I had the revelation 'So that's why all those imperial standard starship look so bland and soulless' - 3000 years later)
 
The Vilani just want all the other races to stop doing the equivalent of sticking random things in their mouths. As the people of Vland have known from the very start, you only put something in your mouth if it has been correctly worked on by the experts, confirmed by precedent, and catalogued correctly. Otherwise you just poisoned yourself. Everything works productively and safely so long as everyone is sensible and stays within the lines.

The Vilani:


EDIT: As I like to say, if the Charted Space setting has a singular story, it’s “the Vilani try to feel secure by crushing the universe under the weight of their expectation, and get annoyed when it won’t fit.” There are a number of great ironies to the Vilani -- of being arch-conservatives who formed the most expansionist nation in charted space; of being wary of technology while using their jump drive accomplishments as the marker to justify their “major” status; to say nothing of their attitude arguably provoking a mirror image in the Solomani ("no, you're not the ones with precedent, we are.")

I'd say the best sources for the "feel" of the Vilani are GURPS Interstellar Wars and -- even more critically -- Agent of the Imperium. The main character in Agent is *named* Bland -- remember V is actually B in Vilani -- and he is literally the record of past decisions given agency in the present. The Vilani experience absolutely can lend itself to dynamic choices; in a sense they live in a richer, higher-stakes world than most. Not "the fate of the Imperium", but "the fate of my family line and all that was passed down to me", which is even bigger than an Imperium no matter how humble you are. I never saw the Vilani as boring or dull. You know how in Star Trek the Klingons killed their gods because they were more trouble than they were worth? That's nothing. The Vilani stuck an "unauthorised use can lead to death" sign on the gods (or their war machines at any rate) -- not out of timidity but because it seemed sensible -- and then started making a checklist regarding the *authorised* use. Beat that.
 
Last edited:
The reality is that the Vilani started out as explorers and conquerors and then... stopped being that. They were the first humans to reach space, I think. Not 100% sure they beat the Geonee, who had a starship to reverse engineer, but I think they beat even them. They expanded massively.

Charted Space has all these implied massive catastrophes floating around waiting to happen and there are some hints that perhaps the Vilani discovered one of these and that's why they consolidated and refused to push forward. It is just an implication, though. Fortunately, most of these catastrophes never got out of the hints phase, whether its Black Ships or the Empress Wave or various other even more obscure ones. That's just not my cup of tea.

Anyway, my point is that the Vilani are not stagnant. They are are focused on consensus, but reward successful unilateral action while harshly punishing disastrous unilateral action. They come from a world where most of the food is somewhere between un-nutritious and outright poisonous without processing and which used to have autonomous killbots roaming about shooting at them.

The uplifted many other humans to space faring, as well as other species like the Newts. As a result, they have some influence on much of the worlds of the Imperium. BUT, the entire Long Night and the entirety of the Third Imperium (a combined several thousand years) is between that influence and the present.
 
Problem 1 with the Vilani.
DGP
Problem 2 with the Vilani.
authors not looking at their history and noticing key things
Problem 3 with the Vilani.
Imperial China tropes
Problem 4 with the Vilani
many people think it was in their nature to become technologically stagnant, I refer back to point 2.

I quite like the idea of looking at the various hominid "species" we know existed 300,000 years ago and base the various human "minor" races from those different branches of humanity.

Have there ever been any threads where the different Third Imperium era minor human races have been linked with the human species that are known to have existed 300,000 or so years ago -- sapiens, neanderthals, erectus, hobbits (floresiensis), and denisovans - to name the ones I can remember without looking them up.

Back to the Vilani - which human species were they?

Overlooked Zhodani facts.
The Ancients transplanted a species of humans. This species evolved into two new "species", the hybidisation and contused evolution produced modern Zhodani.
Are people doing Imperial China tropes with the Vilani? meh.

Anyway, of the 8 or 9 human species that existed 300,000 ago, as far as I know, only Homo Sapiens and Homo Neanderthalensis have been used by anyone as the basis for a minor race. Might be just because we don't know very much about the Denisovans & erectus, much less the heidelbergensis and rhodensias. I don't think Homo Naledi would have been chosen, but I'm not an Ancient so who knows :D
 
Since history rhymes, I thought the Vilani were supposed to be Persian, followed by Solomani Hellenic, with the current Roman.

Though, it could also be Spanish Reconquista, followed by Pax Britannica, and American commercialism.
 
Are people doing Imperial China tropes with the Vilani? meh.

Anyway, of the 8 or 9 human species that existed 300,000 ago, as far as I know, only Homo Sapiens and Homo Neanderthalensis have been used by anyone as the basis for a minor race. Might be just because we don't know very much about the Denisovans & erectus, much less the heidelbergensis and rhodensias. I don't think Homo Naledi would have been chosen, but I'm not an Ancient so who knows :D
Having read extensively on this subject (by no means an expert so take with pinch of salt)

these are the main species: homo erectus was the longest lasting human species, it would give rise to the species that the neanderthals and denisovans evolved from. While there is evidence of erectus still being common 300,000 years ago, alongside sapiens, neanderthals and denisovans there is no evidence of the specise that split from erectus and would become neadertal and denisovan.

We do have evidence for interbreeding between:
sapiens and neanderthal
neanderthal and denisovan
sapiens and denisovan

then there are the hobbits - hobbits (floresiensis) who appear to share a common ancestor that pre-dated Erectus.

Erectus and hobbit
Neanderthal
Denisovan
Modern
 
This isn't much about Imperial culture, but... :D

Homo Heidelbergensis is another from that era, but there has been some debate about whether it is erectus variant or an actual separate species intermediate between erectus and more modern humans. Last info I have, which may be out of date, is that its considered its own species. It's now generally considered to be the same species as the Homo Rhodensiensus specimens, which at one time was thought to be separate.

Homo Naledi appears to be a sister line parallel to Homo Erectus. They were smaller brained and more arboreal than other contemporary humans, but still definitely a human.

So at least these seven could have been sampled by the Ancients. I am not sure how much value there is in that, given we have little information about them or how they would look/behave differently after any Ancients meddling and the passage of millenia. But it's cool in its own right.
 
Every skull (tooth?) gets a species. Everyone gets a prize. Those of us humans who are left are so inbred compared to many species it's hard to tell how much elasticity there is in a single Homo species. If you found the skull of a chihuahua, bull dog, and wolf hound, would you think you had one species or three?

I remember reading about the bush versus railroad theories of human evolution (my words, not the text) in Anthropology 105 forty years ago, and though the names of the fruits and berries and railroad lines may have changed, the arguments haven't. One would think Charted Space would have been the place to figure out if we're all one dysfunctional family, even our little Flores cousins.
 
Not to mention, an organism has to be very lucky (er, unlucky in a very lucky way?) to become a fossil in the first place. It's not reaching to hypothesize hominids we don't know about.
Which is why it is a good idea to keep it as broad as possible.

Erring on the side of caution the species of human around 300,000 years ago likely include

Erectus, Naledi and hobbit (floresiensis)
Heidelbergensis
Neanderthal
Denisovan
Modern (sapiens)

The widest ranging of those are erectus, although neanderthal are more common in europe, denisovan more common in asia, floresiensis in the pacific. Heidelbergensis are likely to be only in europe. The there are the hybrids of neanderthal and denisovan (Middle east into asia), neanderthal and sapiens (middle east into europe), and sapiens denisovan (middle east and into asia). I really want geneticists to stop worrying about cancel culture and release their date.
Erectus wouldn't go extinct until around 100,000 years ago.
 
Last edited:
This isn't much about Imperial culture, but... :D
In order to understand or write about Imperial culture I think it necessary to identify which branch of humanity became the Vilani, the Geonee etc.

I do not subscribe to the idea that Grandfather only took sapiens to the stars, it may be he uplifted sapiens in the first place.
Homo Heidelbergensis is another from that era, but there has been some debate about whether it is erectus variant or an actual separate species intermediate between erectus and more modern humans. Last info I have, which may be out of date, is that its considered its own species. It's now generally considered to be the same species as the Homo Rhodensiensus specimens, which at one time was thought to be separate.
Yup, they keep flip flopping over it. part of the problem is erectus was incredibly wide ranging and one of the longest lasting.
Homo Naledi appears to be a sister line parallel to Homo Erectus. They were smaller brained and more arboreal than other contemporary humans, but still definitely a human.
The could even be a link in the floresiensis chain.
So at least these seven could have been sampled by the Ancients. I am not sure how much value there is in that, given we have little information about them or how they would look/behave differently after any Ancients meddling and the passage of millenia. But it's cool in its own right.
We (as in scientists not me and you :)) are basing a lot of hypothesis on very little evidence. Genetic research is producing results, but sadly it is not politically correct for them to have any discussions.
 
Back
Top