Have to agree the poll is a bit loaded language wise. Too few options and the brick thing. Not entirely the writers fault. I think we're missing part of the discussion though. Put up a poll listing the various hull 4 ships and see which ones have actually been taken, would be taken again and did a job other than act as initiative sink.
I know in our group the hull 4 is almost unseen from anyone unless its a scout with stealth, a fill in initiative sink with a long range weapon (20+ range) when the main fleet has bores or the player has no other choice (Drahk and the occasional odd fraction of a FAP). Not saying that's bad just saying that's what they are used as. I do know that many ships regardless of level are simply dropped from folks list over the hull 4 issue.
Anyway, just wanted to say that maybe we might want to discuss what hull for ships folks HAVE used, why the used them. and would they take them again, rather than these limited take a stand polls.
As a primarily Drazi/League player I've flown the Sunhawk (only for initiative sinks, worthless hull) Darkhawk (excellent ship, front arc bombardment initiative sink) Vaarl/Vaarka (okay one hull 3, both excellent due to stealth/scout function) Xorr (never again) Xixx (excellent bombardment ship) Tiraca (won't likely take again above Patrol level despite good weaps/defenses)
Have done some Centaurii fights with hull 4 Corvan is excellent, Haven/Kutai are crap, Darkner - almost always a better choice but it is the lowest beam, Amar - crap.
Played Earth/Narn quite a bit but...
Hmm...maybe not my best idea...so many small ships to comment on...
Ripple