BF Evo, future weapons

Knight of ne said:
ive looked at all the armour for infantry posted here and one thing struck me as odd, from what pics off legs i can find here, there seems to be a lack off armour for soldiers shins, why?

knight of ne

I'd have to say you're looking at a case of comfort and mobility vs protection there. I mean, notice how the face is still wholely unprotected?
 
Hiromoon said:
Knight of ne said:
ive looked at all the armour for infantry posted here and one thing struck me as odd, from what pics off legs i can find here, there seems to be a lack off armour for soldiers shins, why?

knight of ne

I'd have to say you're looking at a case of comfort and mobility vs protection there. I mean, notice how the face is still wholely unprotected?

i think the knight of NE was a clue hear ;)

shin protection ;) knights of ne ;) monty pyphon ;)

i could be wrong but all seems very familier to me :D lol
 
A Chopper Shield
Firing massive Kevlar and steel nets at inbound rocket-propelled grenades could save helicopters in combat

invawards_rpgnet_485.jpg


Last January, a Black Hawk helicopter flying in rural Iraq burst into flames, killing all 13 soldiers on board. A few days later, a helicopter owned by a private security company crashed in Baghdad, killing five civilian contractors. Over the next few weeks, six more aircraft were shot down, leaving 11 more dead—one of the worst series of chopper disasters since the war began.

Although the Army won’t attribute any crash solely to an RPG—insurgents typically fire guns at the craft as well—the simple, unguided, shoulder-launched projectiles are widely believed to be the primary anti-chopper ordnance of the insurgency.

New Jersey inventor Richard Glasson thinks he can stop the attacks. He’s designed the first-ever anti-RPG system for aircraft: a volley of nets that catch the grenades before they hit. Glasson was inspired by Mark Bowden’s best seller Black Hawk Down, which recounts the 1993 killing of 18 U.S. soldiers in Somalia after an RPG brought down their chopper. “I couldn’t believe that such a low-tech weapon could take down a several-million-dollar aircraft,” he says. “That’s a spectacular outcome for a 40-year-old technology.”

More at: http://www.popsci.com/popsci/technology/7bd4999bc5b82110vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html


invawards_rpgnet_b_600.jpg

How it Works
When sensors on the helicopter detect an incoming rocket-propelled grenade (RPG), tubes on the chopper fire between one and eight rockets toward the incoming RPG. Each rocket deploys a Kevlar-and-steel net, which inflates like a parachute as it flies, forming an impenetrable barrier between the helicopter and the grenade.
 
A counter tactic to that defense is to fire several RPG rounds, delayed a second or two. After the first rounds are defeated the followup attack has a chance to hit. Sort of like the counter to armoring up the HMMWVs against an IED was to simply place three times the normal artillery rounds in the hole when setting up the IED. However, just because someone will find a way around your defense is no reason not to deploy it. It looks like it might work, but at least the net cannot deploy until the host missile clears the blade-wash.

As vitalis6969 said but with a twist, maybe it will give an idea to the bad guys to use a similar missile themselves that will itself tangle up the rotor blades and make the chopper drop out of the sky. :roll:
 
BuShips said:
A counter tactic to that defense is to fire several RPG rounds, delayed a second or two.
That's fine, except most units are lucky to get 1-2 shots with any accuracy, much less several in rapid succession. Those that are trained and capable of the feat tend to have better gear than RPGs.
 
Paladin said:
BuShips said:
A counter tactic to that defense is to fire several RPG rounds, delayed a second or two.
That's fine, except most units are lucky to get 1-2 shots with any accuracy, much less several in rapid succession. Those that are trained and capable of the feat tend to have better gear than RPGs.

I guess my opinion was tainted by all the long-range Anti-tank rounds I've landed in BF2 :lol:. The most fun is "sniping" infantry (especially snipers).

:lol: :lol:
 
Hiromoon said:
“I couldn’t believe that such a low-tech weapon could take down a several-million-dollar aircraft,” he says. “That’s a spectacular outcome for a 40-year-old technology.”

You what?!

Lets see here, we our several-milion-dollar aircraft, which generally doesn't have much armour due to weight constraints. It has various bits of machinery that keep it in the air.
We take some form of rocket propelled explosive device (say a low-tech 40-year-old anti-tank weapon), which we proceed to fire at our mulit-million-dollar aircraft. Due to various physical effects connected with explosions the anti-tank weapon causes damage to the aircraft. Unfortunatley the fancy computer technology which makes the aircraft cost so much does little to protect it against explosions. The damage is likely to effect either the crew or the machinery that keeps the aircraft in the air. Net result the aircraft falls out of the air with unpleasent results for all on board.
No surprises there then...

Although if it works he's got a winner there...


Nick
 
Back
Top