Alexb83 said:Or indeed railguns, coilguns, or phased plasma guns?
Reaverman said:When was the last time you saw the British army, running around with a 'Phase Plasma gun'?
Kristovich said:Well, who knows. If all armies used non-leathal weapons wars would be alot more tolerated wouldn't they?
Seriuosly though, what difference would it make game-wise? A model who is taken off the table might be dead, injured or something like that. So non-lethal weapons would probably still remove models. If you understand what I mean.
Do believe this is where the LZ (X") rules come into effect - Kristovich is right, game-wise it doesn't matter whether the man is dead, badly wounded, or just too scared to fight on. Model is removed anyway.Reaverman said:There are also the possible use of Thermobaric weapons, no matter where your troops are, they die. Its battlefield deployable, and can kill troops in cover, regardless to how well they are hidden.
Reaverman said:There are also the possible use of Thermobaric weapons, no matter where your troops are, they die. Its battlefield deployable, and can kill troops in cover, regardless to how well they are hidden.
Makoto said:Kristovich is right, game-wise it doesn't matter whether the man is dead, badly wounded, or just too scared to fight on. Model is removed anyway.
Reaverman said:I'm not talking about how the game is played, I am on about whether the weapons will feature the game!
Hiromoon said:Actually, there's a railgun in development for the US Military.... Tank mounted.
Hiromoon said:That I don't know. What I do know is that any tank hit by this thing will have it's crew reduced to the consitancy of chunky salsa.
Kristovich said:So does that work now? I mean, if I hit a tank with a rail I'll scratch the paint at most :lol: