Sounds like a semantics situation to me, please give me a really good definition of the precise definition of the difference between APC and IFV.
I am just guessing here but is it because an IFV has a turret and weapon/s as well as carrying troops??
If so what about something like a Merkava that can carry troops (just a couple or so internally.
A modern IFV (such as the Bradley)would qualify as a tank under most wwII designations along with thw Pzkw I, II and III. Better armed and armored plus carrying troops.
A rose by any other name still has thorns.
To those of us who know little or nothing about British armoured vehicles, it would have been nice if the S & P article had mentioned just what role a "Warrior" actually fills in combat.
I had to guess that it was some sort of command vehicle but I really did not know.
Guess, I must not be a wargamer, cause I didn't care all that much. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: