If the minis are being dumped, why even publish another game

Bugpocalypse

Mongoose
I know this seems like a silly question, but if Mongoose is dropping all their minis, why even bother making more games? VaS and CTA play good with counters, but some games wouldn't (sst, BE), so with no fig support, is there honestly any logical reason to publish a new game/genre? I really hope mongoose stays in business, but you really need more than just rules. :cry:
 
Bugpocalypse said:
I know this seems like a silly question, but if Mongoose is dropping all their minis, why even bother making more games? VaS and CTA play good with counters, but some games wouldn't (sst, BE), so with no fig support, is there honestly any logical reason to publish a new game/genre? I really hope mongoose stays in business, but you really need more than just rules. :cry:

Huh?

Are you seriously saying that without minis, you cant play RPGs? Or am I completely off here?

Ive never used minis until I came across Conan, and all games Ive played previously havent even got any mini-support at all. Basically everyone I know play without minis and most of Swedens community as well. Ive managed without them for 15 years. If Im right to assume you´re talking about p&p games then I think your statement is rather cretinous...IMHO. No offence.

If you meant something else, then I have no comment... :D
 
VaS = Victory At Sea, a miniatures combat game.
CTA = Call To Arms, a miniatures combat game.
SST = Starship Troopers, a miniatures combat game.

there's a subtle theme here. and no offense taken, I just think we weren't on the same page as i dont do rpg's but tabletop combat only.
 
VaS's concept was to take advantage of currently existing miniatures in the market.

CTA and SST, I'll grant ya

BF:MC follows VaS's concept.
 
Bugpocalypse said:
VaS = Victory At Sea, a miniatures combat game.
CTA = Call To Arms, a miniatures combat game.
SST = Starship Troopers, a miniatures combat game.

there's a subtle theme here. and no offense taken, I just think we weren't on the same page as i dont do rpg's but tabletop combat only.

Well, Mongoose started out as an RPG company, and still publishes RPGs, so this is partially a case of different pages. They have never been solely about tabletop gaming.

But I also disagree that you can't make a business out of just rules. It won't be a big business, or in this case business unit, but there are people who publish rulesets and that's it. And I think there's plenty of modern and WWII minis out there if you want to design rules for those periods.
 
Rulebooks are good earners, low production and investment costs compared to miniatures.
Future rulebooks under the Evo title will be getting third party miniature support.
Mongoose make good rulesets.
Very few would argue that point.
And most importantly, they sell enough to make a reasonable profit.
:)
 
"Future rulebooks under the Evo title will be getting third party miniature support."

There is no evidence to support such a statement. It appears to be a general call to any third party miniature makers to save the day. However, I haven't heard anyone taking the pitch.

"Mongoose make good rulesets. Very few would argue that point."

The pages fell out of my first BEVO ruleset. Quality control in the book line has been somewhat suspect. Now, the whole miniature line is dead.

Mongoose has a lot of great ideas. the company started the line with 4 miniature lines. Now they have none. The company started 2007 with Mr. Sprange claiming that mongoose will be the first company to have prepainted miniatures. Now the company has been driven from the miniatures market.

I certainly wish the company well.
 
"Future rulebooks under the Evo title will be getting third party miniature support."

As Evo will be historical and present day, there are already bucket loads of miniatures available. It doesn't need to be tied to a particular manufacturer.

Other rules sets already manage this, why not Mongoose?
 
Rulebooks are good earners, low production and investment costs compared to miniatures.

Depends on the company. I know that Peter Pig regard the miniatures lines as the major profit earning side of their business, with the rulebooks as a handy (but minor) sideline.
 
Bugpocalypse said:
VaS = Victory At Sea, a miniatures combat game.
CTA = Call To Arms, a miniatures combat game.
SST = Starship Troopers, a miniatures combat game.

there's a subtle theme here. and no offense taken, I just think we weren't on the same page as i dont do rpg's but tabletop combat only.

My mistake, sorry for that. :oops:
 
Hey no problem. :) Ya a good buddy of mine and I are about to jump into Flames of War (basically WWII 40K,lol) and with a mountain of good fig makers out there I don't mind that they put their work into really good rules and let us find our figs where we will. Games that you can actually get 3rd party figs for is ok, but SST isn't gonna work without the official ones unless you use Tyranids and Space Marines/tau for them but then you have to sell a kidney to pay GW's prices. And to be fair, Mongoose puts out very good rulesets and it is a business after all and they can't be expected to keep makin minis and let the whole ship sink. Its just a wee aggravating to find yet another really cool game that 5 minutes after I buy the rule books and start picking out my 1st army, croaks. I'm beginning to agree with Q that he and I are the kiss of death for a system. lol.
 
Bugpocalypse said:
I'm beginning to agree with Q that he and I are the kiss of death for a system. lol.
Nope, that's me.
I bought some SST at its release, but had it in the closet in the 'do this once I'm done with my current 40k army' list. Unfortunately, 3 armies preempted into that queue and I got out the SST minis and started playing and painting them 2 weeks before the first stop of the SST minis when they announced a switch to prepaints...and truly, things never recovered after the BF:Evo debacle...

With ACTA, the time jumped to 6 weeks between my first game and they announce no more minis.

When you make rules for a genre that is full of figures, e.g. WWII, you only have to compete on one front, the rules front. (Something could be said here about fighting on 2 fronts...) You can then focus on making the rules fun and interesting without having to figure out how to make the rules make people want to buy more expensive thousand sons chaos marines...

I have to add that from my observation, the most enduring games have their own universe that grew with the game, e.g. 40k, Battletech, Magic, and Warmachine. I won't say which one of those I play, so as to preserve its life...
 
darklord4 said:
I have to add that from my observation, the most enduring games have their own universe that grew with the game, e.g. 40k, Battletech, Magic, and Warmachine. I won't say which one of those I play, so as to preserve its life...

You missed a couple: Heavy Gear, Jovian Chronicles (both DP9), Striker/Striker II (Traveller), and SFB....
 
weasel_fierce said:
Thats why I play games where I can use any mini's I'd like.

Indeed. And continuing to support the rules w/o producing minis is not the end of the game. Throw in a modified Eldar Jetbike if you need to.
 
Paladin said:
darklord4 said:
Bugpocalypse said:
I'm beginning to agree with Q that he and I are the kiss of death for a system. lol.
Nope, that's me.
I'm in the same boat. The last 3 games I've bought $200-400+ in minis for have tanked in a year or less.

Me too, I was about to order 2 ACTA fleets to really get into the game when I read the anouncement. Now this is very unlikely to happen.
 
am I allowed to say this here? Honestly, Mongoose' miniatures are kind of ugly, there's reasons why people tend not to buy them.

If Mongoose' Lone Wolf line was on par with GW's LotR line, I would have picked up the whole collection. As such all I am looking for is one pack, and I would have picked up Darklords had they made them.
 
Back
Top