Supplement Four
Mongoose
As far as I know (and I may be forgotting one--Roberts may have mentioned it in Conan The Bold, but if he did, I'm sure what he wrote is in tune with his Valorus book.), the only stories that feature Conan's Cimmerian clan are Turtledove's Conan of Venarium and Roberts' Conan The Valorous.
I just finished reading Venarium, and I'm about half the way through Valorous (both are excellent reads, btw).
Upon first glance, it looks like the authors disregarded each other (well, Turtledove disregarded, or never looked at, Roberts' book) and went about describing Conan's clan the way that they wanted to as if nothing else were ever written about the topic.
My first take is just to forget the differences and enjoy either book for what they are....
But, I started thinking...(Oh, my!). You know...what Turtledove wrote about Conan's clan and what Roberts wrote about the same can be handwaved/retconned/whatever-the-term to work together as part of Conan's past.
A little more "detail" about his clan, if you will.
You see, in Venarium, Conan's clan is all but wiped out at the hands of the Aquilonians...
Well, what if...
What if those few who survived the destruction of Conan's clanholme became the semi-nomadic people that Conan visitis in Valorous? I just finished reading Venarium, and I don't remember Conan's clan ever actually being named. But, if I'm wrong, and it is named in that book, we'd have two names for the same clan. Well, what if the few survivors from Venarium merged with another clan for survival?
Conan's visit in Valorous is about a decade, give or take a few years, after the Venarium story, so the details about the two clans could very well be considered the story of what has happened to Conan's people.
Thoughts?
(Yeah, I know both stories may not completely jive with some of Howard's letters...but there's something to be said about giving precedence to published stories over author ideals that he, himself, may have changed had he written a story about Conan's clan.
I just finished reading Venarium, and I'm about half the way through Valorous (both are excellent reads, btw).
Upon first glance, it looks like the authors disregarded each other (well, Turtledove disregarded, or never looked at, Roberts' book) and went about describing Conan's clan the way that they wanted to as if nothing else were ever written about the topic.
My first take is just to forget the differences and enjoy either book for what they are....
But, I started thinking...(Oh, my!). You know...what Turtledove wrote about Conan's clan and what Roberts wrote about the same can be handwaved/retconned/whatever-the-term to work together as part of Conan's past.
A little more "detail" about his clan, if you will.
You see, in Venarium, Conan's clan is all but wiped out at the hands of the Aquilonians...
Well, what if...
What if those few who survived the destruction of Conan's clanholme became the semi-nomadic people that Conan visitis in Valorous? I just finished reading Venarium, and I don't remember Conan's clan ever actually being named. But, if I'm wrong, and it is named in that book, we'd have two names for the same clan. Well, what if the few survivors from Venarium merged with another clan for survival?
Conan's visit in Valorous is about a decade, give or take a few years, after the Venarium story, so the details about the two clans could very well be considered the story of what has happened to Conan's people.
Thoughts?
(Yeah, I know both stories may not completely jive with some of Howard's letters...but there's something to be said about giving precedence to published stories over author ideals that he, himself, may have changed had he written a story about Conan's clan.