Canon Versus stats....

  • Thread starter Thread starter H
  • Start date Start date
captainsmirk said:
It would have to have been slightly rolled in relation to its target, otherwise it would shoot through the little pointy bits that are on either side of the lasers...

Nick

Roll and relative positions above and below the ecliptic are abstracted out, so rolling the ship slightly to fire off to the side would translate as a front arc on the table.
 
but then your port/starboard guns would be pointing up and down so wouldnt be able to hit anyone to port or starboard :)
 
well if they can elevate that much perhaps if you have an enemy on the side of you just roll and let him have both the port and starboard batteries combined.
 
emperorpenguin said:
captainsmirk said:
The G'Quan is in fact only capable of firing off boresight in the vertical plane (relative to the ship itself), otherwise it would blow parts of its own nose off
Nick

Watch "And Now For A Word" the G'Quan there fires almost 90 degrees horizontally to starboard

Instead of assuming that G'Quan is a G'Quan, why can't it be a G'Lan instead? Mag Guns occupy a F arc.

Much in the same way as the 2 Vorchans destroying the G'Quan. Clearly there has been a battle. Would it not then fair to assume that the Narn ship has been attacked previously through the engagement and is in less then perfect health.
 
Silvereye said:
emperorpenguin said:
captainsmirk said:
The G'Quan is in fact only capable of firing off boresight in the vertical plane (relative to the ship itself), otherwise it would blow parts of its own nose off
Nick

Watch "And Now For A Word" the G'Quan there fires almost 90 degrees horizontally to starboard

Instead of assuming that G'Quan is a G'Quan, why can't it be a G'Lan instead? Mag Guns occupy a F arc..

Mag guns fire a railgun launched bomb, not a laser beam! Besides that is retconning a ship designed later into the show....
 
well we could just leave them as they are :)
some things are being changed to be closer to what people think is the show.
but as the CGI people in the show were never consistant thats not always a good basis. (try the agrippa being rammed by the churchill, but the ship B5 fires on thats supposed to be the Roanoke has the agrippas nameplate on the side)
 
katadder said:
well we could just leave them as they are :)
some things are being changed to be closer to what people think is the show.
but as the CGI people in the show were never consistant thats not always a good basis. (try the agrippa being rammed by the churchill, but the ship B5 fires on thats supposed to be the Roanoke has the agrippas nameplate on the side)

A cock-up with nameplates doesn't change canonical armaments or capabilities.
 
we are kinda getting off point a bit though :-)
The fact remains that the g'Quan clearly has a forward arc beam (2 beams in fact), whether it has to roll is neither here nor there, the fact is it isn't limited to boresight. Now then, some other ships benefit from being non cannon, the G'Quan looses out. But will Mongoose go Cannon in second ed?
 
Lord David the Denied said:
katadder said:
well we could just leave them as they are :)
some things are being changed to be closer to what people think is the show.
but as the CGI people in the show were never consistant thats not always a good basis. (try the agrippa being rammed by the churchill, but the ship B5 fires on thats supposed to be the Roanoke has the agrippas nameplate on the side)

A cock-up with nameplates doesn't change canonical armaments or capabilities.

no but cockups with weapons systems throughout the series generally does. ships get upto all sorts of stuff in the series. hell a mothership doesnt even fire in its own defense against whitestars (and thats b4 it opens the JP in case someone mentions anything), so should we stip a mothship of all weapons? it also carrys its raiders underneath so perhaps people can atatck any raiders carried on board and they get no dodge.
 
That wasn't a mothership though? the mothership we see in a very hazy shot in another episode is totally different, It's generally assumed it was a cruiser. (isn't it, or a none sex object carrier!)... so should cruisers carry raiders!!
 
Sure, and we see an Omega fire a rear laser when it wasn't meant to have them, and because of this it now has rear lasers. Nothing we can do about CGI cock-ups, but when they are indentified as such we could disregard them. So the Omega would lose the rear lasers to be in line with what was intended for the ship rather than what was seen...
 
hiffano said:
That wasn't a mothership though? the mothership we see in a very hazy shot in another episode is totally different, It's generally assumed it was a cruiser. (isn't it, or a none sex object carrier!)... so should cruisers carry raiders!!

sure why not make it a cruiser, still has no weapons and carrys raiders underneath. and is huge.
 
I think I shall withdraw now, It wouldn't be the first time someone tries to prompt me into an argument, then i get all blamed for it!

You are being just a little bit silly.
 
their has to be that line though, where do you follow cannon, where do you ignore it? their are fundamental weaknesses or strengths on ships, that ignore canon?
It was all a hypothetical discussion anyway, I'm sure that the G'Quan will still be boresighted, I'm sure the omega will have a rear laser, the mothership/carrier/criser will still have guns, and the whitestar will not be boresighted etc.
 
Back
Top