dyssnowman
Mongoose
JoseDominguez said:What? The mongoose forum is the most welcoming, pleasant forum I've ever visited.... there have been a couple of serious arguments, but that's it. The fact that you are able to mention other games without being shutdown is part of this, there's no point trying to flamebait by mentioning other compainies as it just gets discussed, would you prefer a mongoose fanboy website?
No, I would not prefer a "fanboy" website. And while there have been some serious arguments, there have also been some debates that turned down-right nasty and after much mudslinging were shut down. I am not saying that they should ban any comments regarding other company's products, I just think that they should apply a little more through with their moderating. A major pet peeve of mine.
JoseDominguez said:I'd like to think MG attracts a more mature audience (and I don't mean older players, just more mature).
I must admit that recently this forum has greatly improved, but in the past this was definitely not the case. In fact, it was due to the immaturity and lack of any kind of control on this forum that I originally stopped posting here. Thankfully this seems to have changed for the better, at least as far as the maturity of the members who post on this forum.
JoseDominguez said:And AT-43 is directly relevant to evo, it's the only other product that's really comparable at the moment. I'll be getting both, AT-43 because my group is looking for new games to play, but we don't have the time to paint full armies, and evo because 1) They do look pretty good 2) we are already sold on the SST mechanics.
Yes, I can see how it is relevant to Evo in the sense that they are both skirmish level sci-fi games. I just question how appropriate it is for the most recent pics of a competitor's game system being posted on the forum. To me it would be like Sony advertising XBox games on their website. Does that make sense to you?