Dead Blue Clown said:
I'm not saying no books of longer length get made. I'm saying the industry has moved towards thin hardbacks as an operating model as the standard. White Wolf .
Who released Ptolus at > 600pp and who, of the 7 RPG books on their "latest releases" on their website have 3 at 160pp and 3 at 192pp (The 7th is WoW:Horde Players guide, and is the most expensive product listed, so unlikely to be a 92 pp hardbak)
Dead Blue Clown said:
and Wizards of the Coast .
who, other than adventures (which are softback) have not released a D&D (/FR/Eberron) RPG book under 160pp this year. "Tome of Magic" (apparently three new magic systems) clocks in at 228 pages while the campaign arc "Expedition to Castle Ravenloft" is 224. Similar products from mongoose seem fated to be spread across 4-5 ultra-slim (and thus overpriced) hardback pamphlets.
A third example might be AEG who obviously found "Worlds Largest Dungeon" to be sufficiently succesful to follow it with "Worlds Largest City"
Cults of Glorantha 1 is too slim. The covers are thicker than the content, so the knowledge that it was deliberately split into two parts rather than published as one "normal" (for everyone except mongoose) sized book is particularly galling.
Mongoose appear to have taken two distinct pieces of marketing information "People like Hardbacks" and "People like cheaper, hence slimmer books" and combined them, failing to appreciate that at this size the books look overpriced, because no one normally buys 96 page hardbacks!
Looking at the WW and WotC lists, the "Clanking City" book looks like it should be the equivalent of the aforementiond Ravenloft book or "WoD:Shadows of Mexico" at 192 pp, so to answer DBC's question, What I'd like to see is an absolute minimum of 160 pages...