He-- and most people who abuse line-by-line --aren't even replying to any questions in their quoting. It mostly consists of delivering one-line zingers that the poster thinks sounds clever, or anally responding to even the most insignificant portions of the original text.
You forgot to add "IMHO", right ?
Someone who actually wants to communicate can usually do so effectively by condensing the gist of thier replies into something short and sweet.
Your assumption only proves true if a large block of text can be boiled down into something smaller without losing the ability to answer all of the questions.
Frankly, I really dislike shoddy, incomplete responses by people who try to cram too many concepts into a single sentence or two when responding to a large body of text. IMHO, something inevitably gets lost in the shuffle.
So please, anyone who wants to use line by line, please do continue.
Mad Dog
You forgot to add "IMHO", right ?
Someone who actually wants to communicate can usually do so effectively by condensing the gist of thier replies into something short and sweet.
Your assumption only proves true if a large block of text can be boiled down into something smaller without losing the ability to answer all of the questions.
Frankly, I really dislike shoddy, incomplete responses by people who try to cram too many concepts into a single sentence or two when responding to a large body of text. IMHO, something inevitably gets lost in the shuffle.
So please, anyone who wants to use line by line, please do continue.
Mad Dog
