While I can understand the frustration, isn't it easier for a referee to take something made for Third Imperium and file the serial numbers off to make it generic rather than taking something generic and needing a separate declaration of what is or isn't valid in the 3I.Any chance you can keep it generic and not make yet another "generic but really the Third Imperium" sourcebook?
I don't care if they use flipping hieroglyphs. Just give me something to differentiate between 1000000 and 100000!Well, really just meant depends on where in the world you are. Either way something to separate them would be nice.
No. Chris is doing HG, I am doing CSC. Saw people discussing fabricator volumes aboveOr how about use the adjustable hull option, if it allows pop up weapon bays it should manage pop up ram scoops...
which leads to the next bit...
once this revision is produced no author is allowed to make up stuff that already exists because they either don't know High Guard, CSC, Robots, Vehicles, World Builders well enough or can't be bothered to ask someone. No matter who the author is the editorial team should say, take this back and use the rules as written.
By the way this is the CSC thread, did you mean to put this in the High Guard thread?
Happily, in this case both British and Unistat usage is commas for separators.I don't care if they use flipping hieroglyphs. Just give me something to differentiate between 1000000 and 100000!
Also, nearly all (if not all) of the Traveller products I have use British spelling (armour etc.)
Ewwww like the Swiss!I prefer apostrophes.
And I can help with both, including my own inconsistences...No. Chris is doing HG, I am doing CSC. Saw people discussing fabricator volumes above![]()
And introduce new inconsistencies?And I can help with both, including my own inconsistences...
First rule of writing for Thieves' World: There are no inconsistencies.And introduce new inconsistencies?![]()