Seconded. In it's current state it is useless as a design system. Some of the concepts are salvageable but it needs to be re-written to be able to produce CRB weapons at the very least.
When? No idea, but it seems that it would move from muscle-power, to mechanical-power, to chemical power, to electro-magnetic power, to gravitic-power.
Examples.
muscle-power = throw a rock
mechanical-power = Use a bow to fire an arrow
chemical-power = gunpowder
electro-magnetic = rail guns
gravitic = No idea. lol
Focussed chemical reaction, more energetic than gunpowder - an example of that might be technological level ten advanced combat rifle.
In theory, that could be more refined past technological level twelve, though that would need to be accompanied with increased strength for the breech and barrel.
Until there is an electricity generation method more power dense than chemical explosives as used in bullets et al then the chemical explosive powered projectile is going to remain first choice.
There may be a couple of more advancements to come with chemical propellants - binary, caseless etc.
Rockets also count in that class - it's not just bullets and shells.
Gas or liquid reservoirs to store energy in the form of pressure have been used already (i.e. air rifles) and might be amenable to high tech improvements in the same way mechanical machine guns got a new lease of life when an electric motor was added to turn the crank.
I could see a high tech airgun that charges using solar power having niche uses. Maybe the environment is too flammable for safe use of guns? Maybe for stealth? Maybe to circumvent the letter of a (possibly religious) law prohibiting firearms?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.