Tech Level 8 Solar System

Tom Kalbfus said:
I'm busy working on the setting, and have lots or work to do, I don't have time to be distracted with social niceties, I'm sorry you don't think I'm suave or charismatic enough, but I'm trying to produce a detailed setting. I'm trying to do two things at once, prepare this setting, provide it for your review, and then answer your questions about it, but I never had the gift of gab, I am sort of geekish, and have a bit of Asperger's to deal with, so I'm sorry I am not "the Fonz" and am not cool. I am not here to socialize and to small talk. Social interactions have always been a mystery, I have never been good at it, and I am 48 years old, and this is not a skill which can be learned easily. I tend to be single-minded with the subjects I am interested in, but I think I have some useful things to contribute, so please bear with me.

You're "busy working on a setting" that nobody here has asked for. I mean, great, if you want to do it for yourself then by all means go ahead, knock yourself out... but this is exactly what a blog is for. Or a personal website. Not a discussion board about a game that has nothing to do with what you're writing. For some bizarre reason you are incredibly resistant to the idea of using a blog - a medium that is designed exactly for the purpose that you're hijacking this board for, and I can't for the life of me understand why you refuse to do that.

If you put it on a blog or your own site then you can spend all the time in the world writing stuff on those sites and not annoy anyone, and then if you feel the need you can come here when you've finished it all and then you can ask for discussion and input. The point of "review" is to review it after it's finished - it's ridiculous for you to throw things up here while you're still thinking about it and getting it out of your head. That's what you don't seem to be able to grasp!

Don't post your F,G,H I and J charts or whatever here. Just don't, it's a waste of time and space, as I have already pointed out. Get a Wordpress site, write it all in a blog, post your charts there if you really must waste your life making them, and then say when it's ready.
 
Tom Kalbfus said:
I'm trying to do two things at once, prepare this setting, provide it for your review, and then answer your questions about it, but I never had the gift of gab, I am sort of geekish, and have a bit of Asperger's to deal with, so I'm sorry I am not "the Fonz" and am not cool.

Now now, let’s not bring “cool”ness into this... or, clearly, we’ll all lose.
 
fusor said:
Tom Kalbfus said:
I'm busy working on the setting, and have lots or work to do, I don't have time to be distracted with social niceties, I'm sorry you don't think I'm suave or charismatic enough, but I'm trying to produce a detailed setting. I'm trying to do two things at once, prepare this setting, provide it for your review, and then answer your questions about it, but I never had the gift of gab, I am sort of geekish, and have a bit of Asperger's to deal with, so I'm sorry I am not "the Fonz" and am not cool. I am not here to socialize and to small talk. Social interactions have always been a mystery, I have never been good at it, and I am 48 years old, and this is not a skill which can be learned easily. I tend to be single-minded with the subjects I am interested in, but I think I have some useful things to contribute, so please bear with me.

You're "busy working on a setting" that nobody here has asked for. I mean, great, if you want to do it for yourself then by all means go ahead, knock yourself out... but this is exactly what a blog is for. Or a personal website. Not a discussion board about a game that has nothing to do with what you're writing. For some bizarre reason you are incredibly resistant to the idea of using a blog - a medium that is designed exactly for the purpose that you're hijacking this board for, and I can't for the life of me understand why you refuse to do that.

If you put it on a blog or your own site then you can spend all the time in the world writing stuff on those sites and not annoy anyone, and then if you feel the need you can come here when you've finished it all and then you can ask for discussion and input. The point of "review" is to review it after it's finished - it's ridiculous for you to throw things up here while you're still thinking about it and getting it out of your head. That's what you don't seem to be able to grasp!

Don't post your F,G,H I and J charts or whatever here. Just don't, it's a waste of time and space, as I have already pointed out. Get a Wordpress site, write it all in a blog, post your charts there if you really must waste your life making them, and then say when it's ready.
Nothing to do with Travellor? Isn't Traveller about space, How could doing a post about the Solar System have nothing to do about space?. if I posted all the charts in one post, it would make a very long post, rather than posting it in bite sized pieces, I have to turn all these pictures into jpgs on the internet so I can post them here, And I don't have all the fancy tools you have for making blogs, or Solar System simulators that you talk about, I don't have a lot of money for buying these tools, I'd be lucky to get the 2nd edition Mongoose Traveller core rulebook, and I'm a bit leery of buying stuff on the internet as it might expose my credit card numbers to hackers and so forth. I use paint, it comes with windows, and nothing fancy. I don't like downloading stuff unnecessarily, and if I posted something here, it would be jpgs, not a solar system simulator, I'm not a program developer, maybe you are, but I'm not, I don't have a workstation at home, just a lap top. No one is forcing you to look at these and read every post, unless it is your job to do so, is it? Because you seem to think you are speaking for everyone here, did someone elect you to represent the entire forum?
 
He wants you to post it all to a blog in an easily digestible form, and then post a link to that, so that we can have a look at the nearly finished product, and then we’d all discuss it here. While I admit it would certainly be preferable to how you have done things, I’m not about to begrudge you doing things the way you have been, in spite of how non-ideal it is.
 
Tom Kalbfus said:
Nothing to do with Travellor? Isn't Traveller about space, How could doing a post about the Solar System have nothing to do about space?. if I posted all the charts in one post, it would make a very long post, rather than posting it in bite sized pieces, I have to turn all these pictures into jpgs on the internet so I can post them here, And I don't have all the fancy tools you have for making blogs, or Solar System simulators that you talk about, I don't have a lot of money for buying these tools, I'd be lucky to get the 2nd edition Mongoose Traveller core rulebook, and I'm a bit leery of buying stuff on the internet as it might expose my credit card numbers to hackers and so forth. I use paint, it comes with windows, and nothing fancy. I don't like downloading stuff unnecessarily, and if I posted something here, it would be jpgs, not a solar system simulator, I'm not a program developer, maybe you are, but I'm not, I don't have a workstation at home, just a lap top. No one is forcing you to look at these and read every post, unless it is your job to do so, is it? Because you seem to think you are speaking for everyone here, did someone elect you to represent the entire forum?

Again, you're not listening. Focus!

Blogs are free. You don't need "expensive tools" for them. Go to https://wordpress.com/ and start one. The free option they have would work fine for you.

The Solar system simulators that are out there are free. They require a bit of effort to learn, but I'm sure you'll manage - google for the ones I mentioned (Celestia, Space Engine, Orbiter).

Some graphics programs are free. GIMP is a good one that does a lot of things that photoshop does. https://www.gimp.org/

So "I don't have any money" is no excuse. And you wouldn't be "downloading stuff unnecessarily" because these would be necessary. Yes, you'd need to learn how to use them but apparently you have lots of time on your hands and it'll only benefit you in the long run.


And yes, it's nothing to do with Traveller. Traveller is more than just "about space", it has specific assumptions and settings which you're ignoring completely. Lord of the Rings is "about fantasy" but that doesn't mean you can throw Game of Thrones or a bog-standard D&D campaign in there.
 
Tom Kalbfus said:
I use paint, it comes with windows, and nothing fancy.
To change the subject and get a more friendly note into this thread, you could use Paint.Net, a free improved version of Paint with a lot more features than Paint. I have been using it for years now for everything from maps to photos.

http://www.getpaint.net/features.html
 
rust2 said:
Tom Kalbfus said:
I use paint, it comes with windows, and nothing fancy.
To change the subject and get a more friendly note into this thread, you could use Paint.Net, a free improved version of Paint with a lot more features than Paint. I have been using it for years now for everything from maps to photos.

http://www.getpaint.net/features.html

I mean, good gods, Paint?! That doesn't even have tools to make concentric circles and square grids and line them up very effectively, as far as I can see. Is he doing it all by hand?! Maybe he only has to do it once and then copy it, but without layers or anything? Yikes.
 
fusor said:
Tom Kalbfus said:
Nothing to do with Travellor? Isn't Traveller about space, How could doing a post about the Solar System have nothing to do about space?. if I posted all the charts in one post, it would make a very long post, rather than posting it in bite sized pieces, I have to turn all these pictures into jpgs on the internet so I can post them here, And I don't have all the fancy tools you have for making blogs, or Solar System simulators that you talk about, I don't have a lot of money for buying these tools, I'd be lucky to get the 2nd edition Mongoose Traveller core rulebook, and I'm a bit leery of buying stuff on the internet as it might expose my credit card numbers to hackers and so forth. I use paint, it comes with windows, and nothing fancy. I don't like downloading stuff unnecessarily, and if I posted something here, it would be jpgs, not a solar system simulator, I'm not a program developer, maybe you are, but I'm not, I don't have a workstation at home, just a lap top. No one is forcing you to look at these and read every post, unless it is your job to do so, is it? Because you seem to think you are speaking for everyone here, did someone elect you to represent the entire forum?

Again, you're not listening. Focus!

Blogs are free. You don't need "expensive tools" for them. Go to https://wordpress.com/ and start one. The free option they have would work fine for you.

The Solar system simulators that are out there are free. They require a bit of effort to learn, but I'm sure you'll manage - google for the ones I mentioned (Celestia, Space Engine, Orbiter).

Some graphics programs are free. GIMP is a good one that does a lot of things that photoshop does. https://www.gimp.org/

So "I don't have any money" is no excuse. And you wouldn't be "downloading stuff unnecessarily" because these would be necessary. Yes, you'd need to learn how to use them but apparently you have lots of time on your hands and it'll only benefit you in the long run.


And yes, it's nothing to do with Traveller. Traveller is more than just "about space", it has specific assumptions and settings which you're ignoring completely. Lord of the Rings is "about fantasy" but that doesn't mean you can throw Game of Thrones or a bog-standard D&D campaign in there.
So far I've just posted a Generic Solar System, the Terra System exists in the Solomani Rim setting, so these charts could be used in that, the only difference is I used miles instead of kilometers, but miles lines up more nicely with the standard sizes of Traveller planets, and they are measured in thousands of miles and its easy to do the conversion. I use 100 pixels per square. And for your information D&D is not a specific setting, one could indeed play Lord of the Rings using Dungeons & Dragons, you basically have to use different rules for magic, but that's about it. D&D covers many different Worlds. Traveller originally was a generic setting, so I'm just tweaking the rules to match the setting I have in mind here.

The Solar System is a very big place, the way it is used in the standard Traveller setting makes it seem small. My idea is to make Gerard O'Neill's book, The High Frontier into an RPG setting using as many standard Traveller rules as possible, and throwing out the ones that don't fit, such Jump Drives or reactionless engines. One thing O'Neill complained about was "planetary chauvinism" and the standard Traveller setting has a lot of that. Traveller assumes that most people will live on planets of moons, and that space is just used as a medium of travel to get from one world to the next. Well if I throw out that assumption, it turns out that an FTL drive is not needed after all, people can live in artificial colonies in space, and there is plenty of room for them in our own Solar System. One doesn't need a way to get around the light barrier if one is not looking for natural planets to live on, so the challenge then becomes, how do you turn an O'Neill Space setting into an interesting RPG setting. Anyway my intent is to draw a map, the only things that move around much are in the inner solar system, over 90 days, theouter planets barely move at all, so for planning purposes I am putting things on these charts, since I already did so many of them, and I am basically taking a snapshot of the Solar System, and lying out the colonies. We can talk about them along the way. Yes, I am doing things by hand, and with Paint, it is easy enough to line up concentric circles, I lay them out and then adjusted them so that each one is centered on the smaller one, with practice I have gotten good at this, I have learned the ins and outs of Microsoft paint. Laying out a square grid was easy enough, life you said, I did a lot of copying. I use paint as a "chalk board" to express my ideas visually. To post my ideas, I go to Deviantart to put them in a form I can post visually here, I am more that 50% complete with my charting, so if you don't mind, I'll just complete what I am doing here, and then I'll learn about the other stuff. We can do plenty of talking along the way. I am at the chalk board stage in planning this setting.

I have thought about terraforming the planets, but after some discussion here, I've decided that would just bring I back to "Planetary Chauvanism" so I am leaving the planets unterraformed, people still live on them. Venus is the Hellhole it has always been, but people to live in lighter-than-air habitats in its upper atmosphere. Venus has almost the right gravity that humans need to stay healthy, breathable air is less dense and lighter that Venus' carbon-dioxide atmosphere, and the upper atmosphere at an altitude of 35 miles. One can do a "Cloud City" in the atmosphere's of the gas giants, but there are two problems with that, one is the atmosphere at the 1- bar level is too cold in all of the gas giants, and if you go to a deep enough level where it isn't too cold, you end up having to breath exotic mixtures of gases to avoid nitrogen narcosis, and the other gases, such as helium are only good up to around 10 bar, and then you start suffering from the effects of narcosis with hat gas as well. One could of course live in a submarine environment and hold out the pressure with a rigid container, but that would limit your habitat to small sizes, otherwise the vessel would implode, but even if it doesn't implode against all that outside pressure, hydrogen gas has a tendency to lead through solid walls because molecules of it are so small. A depressurized vessel would have to deal with a hydrogen build up within an atmosphere containing oxygen so humans can breath. If the hydrogen concentration gets high enough an there is a spark, you get an explosion. All of the gas giant's atmospheres are flammable in the presence of oxygen, so Venus is perhaps the friendliest extraterrestrial environment that humans can live in so long as they stay in its upper atmosphere, and there is plenty of solar energy here as well.

The most populated part of the Solar System is the inner Solar System, this is because Earth is located here, and the other parts of it are closest to Earth, in the Outer Solar System, it is easiest to live in an O'Neill colony in a vaccum, one can set up large mirrors in space to concentrate sunlight as needed, and in a weightless environment, then mirrors can be thin and light weight, in other words they don't need to hold themselves up under gravity in a planetary environment, and in a weightless environment, you can always have a standard 1 Earth gravity, by rotating the vessel at a certain rate. (You don't need switch on/switch off artificial gravity that is featured in many standard Traveller spaceships and space stations.) I don't have time to learn new RPG systems, so I am just adapting the Traveller rules that are relevant. I like the simplicity of 1 through 6-G standard accelerations. the rocket systems I have outlined are superior to anything we have today. In Oribital for instance, there are separate spaceships for getting off of a planet and the ones that go from one part of the Solar System to another, stay in space and do not land, I decided to eliminate that part, and just have oneset of spaceships that do both, without having to resort to shuttles to orbit. I'm assuming high thrust fusion rockets, and yes I know some "Poindexter" is going to say there are some problems with a fusion rocket operating in an atmosphere, and there will be problems dumping all that heat, but I'll just assume that future technology has found a solution for that and handwave it away. We don't have to solve tomorrows problems with today's technology after all, so I'll assume tomorrows scientists and engineers are cleverer than we are today, and I don't have to design a technology system that will work today to play this game in this setting.

Since I have already posted it on Deviantart, here is Jupiter on the same scale Chart H as the other planets I have done do far:
orbit_chart_h_jupiter_by_tomkalbfus-dac4uzh.png

Jupiter, as you can see, fills most of the chart at this scale, so there is room for only 2 orbits, one just above the cloud tops and one 5000 miles further up. The low orbit is probably the most suitable for humans. If you orbit just above Jupiter's atmosphere, traces of that atmosphere sweep space of most of that hostile lethal radiation that exists higher up in Jupiter's magnetic field. People will tend to avoid living on Io and Europa, maybe within it, under the crust, but not on the surface of those worlds. Ganymede and Callisto are more suitable planetary colonization targets. An O'Neill with a thick enough hull can block out most of the radiation coming from Jupiter's Van Allen belts, but these are large vessels, sometimes it becomes necessary to do work on the outside of the hull. Robots can be used, but the radiation will eventually fry their circuits. but you could place an O'Neill just above the atmosphere, high enough to stay in orbit with some orbital boosts from time to time, but not so high as to expose the colony to the high levels of charged particles that accumulate in Jupiter's magnetosphere. Why would anyone want to live here? That is good question. There is helium-3 to be found in Jupiter's atmosphere, the Moon is another source, but Jupiter has a lot more of it, the easiest source to get at is the planet Uranus of course, since that is the smallest gas giant in the Solar System, which has the least gravity to overcome to bring it out.

You could of course use it as a generic Large Gas Giant for your standard Traveller campaign as well, just change the scale to 8000 km per square if you like using the metric system, and that will be close enough.
 
Wait, you have a deviantart account that you're posting these charts too? Then why on earth don't you posts links to that instead of taking up all the space here?. And you can post pictures and text associated with them on deviantart, so you can put the descriptions on deviantart too.

And again, you're totally ignoring everything I say. Don't do the "chalkboard stage of your planning" here - If people want to see anything, they'll want to see the final result of what you come up with. We don't need to see every step along the way, particularly when you've made it clear that you're not going to listen to anyone's comments about it. What are you going to do, finishing reposting all your charts from somewhere that they're already posted, and then make new updated versions with all the colonies on them and post all of those again? That's crazy!
 
fusor said:
Wait, you have a deviantart account that you're posting these charts too? Then why on earth don't you posts links to that instead of taking up all the space here?. And you can post pictures and text associated with them on deviantart, so you can put the descriptions on deviantart too.

And again, you're totally ignoring everything I say. Don't do the "chalkboard stage of your planning" here - If people want to see anything, they'll want to see the final result of what you come up with. We don't need to see every step along the way, particularly when you've made it clear that you're not going to listen to anyone's comments about it. What are you going to do, finishing reposting all your charts from somewhere that they're already posted, and then make new updated versions with all the colonies on them and post all of those again? That's crazy!

Well, then I could just do everything without your input, and just have you all tear it all apart when I present the finished product. Is that what your planning? You are going to say, this is all stupid, and I should have done that, or why didn't I do this, that is what is going to happen if I just give you everything when its done after all that work and then according you, I should then redo everything. That is what I would predict is going to happen if I did it that way. Am I wrong?

And by the way, do you like going to new links and waiting for those new sites to load? It increases the risk to your computer with every new site you visit! I've had antivirus software, but it never works 100%!
 
Tom Kalbfus said:
Well, then I could just do everything without your input

Well you're ignoring everyone's input here anyway, so what's the difference?


and just have you all tear it all apart when I present the finished product. Is that what your planning? You are going to say, this is all stupid, and I should have done that, or why didn't I do this, that is what is going to happen if I just give you everything when its done after all that work and then according you, I should then redo everything. That is what I would predict is going to happen if I did it that way. Am I wrong?

So what, you're paranoid as well? You said you wanted people to review it - we can't review anything while you're still making it, that's a waste of everyone's time. Do the final thing, tell us when it's ready, and if anyone cares enough to read it then they'll give you their opinion. If it's good, then people will like it. If there are flaws then people will criticise it. That's how this works.


And by the way, do you like going to new links and waiting for those new sites to load? It increases the risk to your computer with every new site you visit! I've had antivirus software, but it never works 100%!

My gods, you will come up with any excuse, won't you. You've got to be taking the piss, right? Of course people will click on links - they're not cowering at the thought of clicking things, it's how the internet works!
 
Sigtrygg said:
Tom, please keep posting your stuff.
Here's the link:
orbit_chart_h_saturn_by_tomkalbfus-dac778r.png

This is a chart of Saturn at the 5000 mile per square scale. As you can see there are 3 orbits available at this scale. I want to talk about what I'm posting rather than be forced to keep defending myself from hypercritical Fusor here.
There is one significant body in this system besides Saturn itself, that would be the moon Titan, and of course the rings as well. Not on his map, because we're still too close to this planet to show it on the map. But I will get to it. Next up, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, then we skip over Mercury an Venus at the 50,000 mile per square level and go to Earth. Earth has a large moon, and this would be the first time we can cover both bodies in one map, then we skip Mars because we got all of its moons and go on to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune at this scale, and I think we may need to do Jupiter and Saturn at the 500,000 mile per square level and then I'm done with the basic "geography" of the Solar System.
 
Tom Kalbfus said:
Venus is the Hellhole it has always been, but people to live in lighter-than-air habitats in its upper atmosphere.

The extra winds on Venus are up to 190 Miles per Hour. Gusts are going to make any floating ship fling about so violently that no one could live. Bring it back down to the ground in some old-fashioned domes, I think. Gravity is better down there, too. What is so special about Venus’s upper atmosphere?

Tom Kalbfus said:
... you can always have a standard 1 Earth gravity, by rotating the vessel at a certain rate.

... Not exactly; there are... issues. You need to read more Atomic Rockets.

Tom Kalbfus said:
... the rocket systems I have outlined are superior to anything we have today.

Please post the rocket systems in their own post. I’ve been neglecting that material on the grounds that it’s off-topic, and that you dump too much insufficiently sorted material all at once to consider it on its own merit.

Tom Kalbfus said:
In Oribital for instance, there are separate spaceships for getting off of a planet and the ones that go from one part of the Solar System to another, stay in space and do not land, I decided to eliminate that part, and just have oneset of spaceships that do both, without having to resort to shuttles to orbit. I'm assuming high thrust fusion rockets, and yes I know some "Poindexter" is going to say there are some problems with a fusion rocket operating in an atmosphere, and there will be problems dumping all that heat, but I'll just assume that future technology has found a solution for that and handwave it away. We don't have to solve tomorrows problems with today's technology after all, so I'll assume tomorrows scientists and engineers are cleverer than we are today, and I don't have to design a technology system that will work today to play this game in this setting.

Once again, you need to read more Atomic Rockets. For what you are proposing, it would require a revolution in radiation engineering. It would probably also make nuclear weapons a much more attractive option, potentially preventing the future you describe

Tom Kalbfus said:
Since I have already posted it on Deviantart, here is Jupiter on the same scale Chart H as the other planets I have done do far:
Jupiter, as you can see, fills most of the chart at this scale, so there is room for only 2 orbits, one just above the cloud tops and one 5000 miles further up.

Orbits don’t work that way. Learn your Inverse-Square Law and gravitational functions.

Tom Kalbfus said:
The low orbit is probably the most suitable for humans. If you orbit just above Jupiter's atmosphere, traces of that atmosphere sweep space of most of that hostile lethal radiation that exists higher up in Jupiter's magnetic field.

You probably can’t solve the “Radioactive Rocket Exhaust” problem without also solving the “Radioactive Magnetic Field” problem. If one thing is a problem, the other probably still is too.

Tom Kalbfus said:
Robots can be used, but the radiation will eventually fry their circuits.

Actually, there’s quite a bit of room for argument over this point. The United States and Japan are cooperating on the Fukushima cleanup for the next 40 years. Part of that is the United States being interested in ruggedizing robots against nuclear radiation, which is an unavoidable requirement for the cleanup itself. Progress will be made... how much progress? Hard to say, because even the legitimacy of this concern is a bit of an open question. But, in 40 years, we’ll know better.
 
Tom Kalbfus said:
Sigtrygg said:
Tom, please keep posting your stuff.
Here's the link:
http://img10.deviantart.net/edd2/i/2016/213/e/e/orbit_chart_h_saturn_by_tomkalbfus-dac778r.png
this is what I would enclose in 's if I wanted to post it here, it is a chart of Saturn at the 5000 mile per square scale. As you can see there are 3 orbits available at this scale. I want to talk about what I'm posting rather than be forced to keep defending myself from hypercritical Fusor here.
There is one significant body in this system besides Saturn itself, that would be the moon Titan, and of course the rings as well. Not on his map, because we're still too close to this planet to show it on the map. But I will get to it. Next up, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, then we skip over Mercury an Venus at the 50,000 mile per square level and go to Earth. [b]Earth has a large moon, and this would be the first time we can cover both bodies in one map[/b], then we skip Mars because we got all of its moons and go on to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune at this scale, and I think we may need to do Jupiter and Saturn at the 500,000 mile per square level and then I'm done with the basic "geography" of the Solar System.[/quote]
You forgot about the more complete look of the 'Earth system' - the Earth doesn't just have one body around it, it has several - Cruithne has it's own orbit, then we have all of the Earth Trojan asteroids - all of which are a close, convenient source of raw materials that we don't have to go very far to mine.
 
Tenacious-Techhunter said:
Tom Kalbfus said:
Venus is the Hellhole it has always been, but people to live in lighter-than-air habitats in its upper atmosphere.

The extra winds on Venus are up to 190 Miles per Hour. Gusts are going to make any floating ship fling about so violently that no one could live. Bring it back down to the ground in some old-fashioned domes, I think. Gravity is better down there, too. What is so special about Venus’s upper atmosphere?
You forget, the balloon is being pushed by the wind, so its traveling the same speed as the wind, the relative velocity between the balloon and the wind is zero! the wind actually helps, because it takes the balloon completely around Venus once every 4 days, this is much better than the slow rotation of the planet if you are on the surface. the main reason you are up there is because its cooler, at the right altitude its around room temperature, Air pressure is less than on Earth at that altitude, but you can increase the percentage of oxygen in the habitat to compensate, if you go outside, you can wear a gas mask, and perhaps some protection from the sulfuric acid rain.
Tom Kalbfus said:
... you can always have a standard 1 Earth gravity, by rotating the vessel at a certain rate.

... Not exactly; there are... issues. You need to read more Atomic Rockets.

Tom Kalbfus said:
... the rocket systems I have outlined are superior to anything we have today.

Please post the rocket systems in their own post. I’ve been neglecting that material on the grounds that it’s off-topic, and that you dump too much insufficiently sorted material all at once to consider it on its own merit.

Tom Kalbfus said:
In Oribital for instance, there are separate spaceships for getting off of a planet and the ones that go from one part of the Solar System to another, stay in space and do not land, I decided to eliminate that part, and just have oneset of spaceships that do both, without having to resort to shuttles to orbit. I'm assuming high thrust fusion rockets, and yes I know some "Poindexter" is going to say there are some problems with a fusion rocket operating in an atmosphere, and there will be problems dumping all that heat, but I'll just assume that future technology has found a solution for that and handwave it away. We don't have to solve tomorrows problems with today's technology after all, so I'll assume tomorrows scientists and engineers are cleverer than we are today, and I don't have to design a technology system that will work today to play this game in this setting.

Once again, you need to read more Atomic Rockets. For what you are proposing, it would require a revolution in radiation engineering. It would probably also make nuclear weapons a much more attractive option, potentially preventing the future you describe

Tom Kalbfus said:
Since I have already posted it on Deviantart, here is Jupiter on the same scale Chart H as the other planets I have done do far:
Jupiter, as you can see, fills most of the chart at this scale, so there is room for only 2 orbits, one just above the cloud tops and one 5000 miles further up.

Orbits don’t work that way. Learn your Inverse-Square Law and gravitational functions.
Yeah I kn ow, but I'm using standard orbits at 5000 mile intervals on this chart, that is what I refer to.
Tom Kalbfus said:
The low orbit is probably the most suitable for humans. If you orbit just above Jupiter's atmosphere, traces of that atmosphere sweep space of most of that hostile lethal radiation that exists higher up in Jupiter's magnetic field.

You probably can’t solve the “Radioactive Rocket Exhaust” problem without also solving the “Radioactive Magnetic Field” problem. If one thing is a problem, the other probably still is too.
Well its a game, so the problem solves itself when you don't consider it, lets just say the future found a solution and we just don't know what it is. Leave it unspecific. We are role playing Gentlemen, we are not actually going into space!

Tom Kalbfus said:
Robots can be used, but the radiation will eventually fry their circuits.

Actually, there’s quite a bit of room for argument over this point. The United States and Japan are cooperating on the Fukushima cleanup for the next 40 years. Part of that is the United States being interested in ruggedizing robots against nuclear radiation, which is an unavoidable requirement for the cleanup itself. Progress will be made... how much progress? Hard to say, because even the legitimacy of this concern is a bit of an open question. But, in 40 years, we’ll know better.
 
Rick said:
Tom Kalbfus said:
Sigtrygg said:
Tom, please keep posting your stuff.
Here's the link:
http://img10.deviantart.net/edd2/i/2016/213/e/e/orbit_chart_h_saturn_by_tomkalbfus-dac778r.png
this is what I would enclose in 's if I wanted to post it here, it is a chart of Saturn at the 5000 mile per square scale. As you can see there are 3 orbits available at this scale. I want to talk about what I'm posting rather than be forced to keep defending myself from hypercritical Fusor here.
There is one significant body in this system besides Saturn itself, that would be the moon Titan, and of course the rings as well. Not on his map, because we're still too close to this planet to show it on the map. But I will get to it. Next up, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, then we skip over Mercury an Venus at the 50,000 mile per square level and go to Earth. [b]Earth has a large moon, and this would be the first time we can cover both bodies in one map[/b], then we skip Mars because we got all of its moons and go on to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune at this scale, and I think we may need to do Jupiter and Saturn at the 500,000 mile per square level and then I'm done with the basic "geography" of the Solar System.[/quote]
You forgot about the more complete look of the 'Earth system' - the Earth doesn't just have one body around it, it has several - Cruithne has it's own orbit, then we have all of the Earth Trojan asteroids - all of which are a close, convenient source of raw materials that we don't have to go very far to mine.[/quote]
It is such a tiny asteroid, I don't worry about it. I include the satellites that are size 1 and larger, tiny little rocks, I don't worry about, except for what's orbiting Mars, since those two are famous. I've had 4 large moons for Jupiter, 4 biggest ones orbiting Saturn, 2 for Uranus, and just one for Neptune and one for Pluto! There are more, but there are too many to mention.
 
Tom Kalbfus said:
You forget, the balloon is being pushed by the wind, so its traveling the same speed as the wind, the relative velocity between the balloon and the wind is zero! the wind actually helps, because it takes the balloon completely around Venus once every 4 days, this is much better than the slow rotation of the planet if you are on the surface. the main reason you are up there is because its cooler, at the right altitude its around room temperature, Air pressure is less than on Earth at that altitude, but you can increase the percentage of oxygen in the habitat to compensate, if you go outside, you can wear a gas mask, and perhaps some protection from the sulfuric acid rain.

I forgot nothing. You forgot that wind speeds are inconsistent and highly variable... prone to dramatic changes. Which tosses the ship around violently. It’s still a bad idea.

There’s a lot you merely quoted but never commented on.
 
Your misuse of quote organization hid some things you commented on, but there were still things you didn’t react to. Please read my post again.

Tom Kalbfus said:
Tenacious Techhunter said:
Orbits don’t work that way. Learn your Inverse-Square Law and gravitational functions.
Yeah I know, but I'm using standard orbits at 5000 mile intervals on this chart, that is what I refer to.

There’s nothing “standard” about 5000 mile intervals. Far more useful information would be demarcating orbits by their period, with a special exception made for geostationary orbit.

Tom Kalbfus said:
Well its a game, so the problem solves itself when you don't consider it, lets just say the future found a solution and we just don't know what it is. Leave it unspecific. We are role playing Gentlemen, we are not actually going into space!

This is not what happens. What happens is, players have an idea that, given their characters, should be actionable, but, because those details were neglected by the people designing the game, nothing happens either predictably or reliably. It becomes a physics argument at the table about what limits are reasonable when none are specified. The parts of the universe that are supposed to be predictable and governed by science and mathematics suddenly are not, and chaos is sown.

If you’re going to deviate from reality, do it with precision, or not at all.
 
Back
Top