ShawnDriscoll
Cosmic Mongoose
I don't. Some of Traveller is awesome. Like Mongoose here.Reynard said:I swear EVERY topic is something horribly negative about Traveller in general
I don't. Some of Traveller is awesome. Like Mongoose here.Reynard said:I swear EVERY topic is something horribly negative about Traveller in general
Reynard said:If they could keep it all on one topic thread I'd be happy to avoid that thread. I swear EVERY topic is something horribly negative about Traveller in general and whatever is specific to the thread. I happen to greatly enjoy Traveller and it get me feeling low with the constant downers.
Plug on I guess.
Reynard said:If they could keep it all on one topic thread I'd be happy to avoid that thread. I swear EVERY topic is something horribly negative about Traveller in general and whatever is specific to the thread. I happen to greatly enjoy Traveller and it get me feeling low with the constant downers.
crazy_cat said:complete amateurish crap
simonh said:The teaser is actually a lot better than I was expecting. It's not HBO, but it's far better than the Star Trek fan shows I've seen.
Wil Mireu said:simonh said:The teaser is actually a lot better than I was expecting. It's not HBO, but it's far better than the Star Trek fan shows I've seen.
You can't have seen any of the good Star Trek fan shows then. Spinward Traveller looks terribly amateur to me, the Star Trek shows I would call at least 'semi-professional' in quality.
Wil Mireu said:badpixie said:There's a bit of an odd attitude here:
"It is Traveller and therefore we should support it."
Well no, actually. If its crap we shouldn't, and we should say so.
T5's almost-instantaneously successful funding is a prime example of how blindly funding something can still produce a really bad product. Unfortunately a good chunk of the Traveller fanbase isn't particularly discerning about the material they acquire.
Maybe people have learned their lesson from that, I don't know. But you're absolutely right - bad product should be shunned, not supported. Funding something just because of the author or because of what it is when you have no idea of the quality or know that it's bad is just throwing money away and is sending the wrong message too.
lexx2503 said:But it has to be done well if we don't want to see chances of more being made torpedoed for at least a decade if it tanks.
... because it's something rather than nothing.
Could you explain "trainwrecks"?Reynard said:After the multi-million dollar trainwrecks that JJ Abrams created with Star Trek I see less problems with a 60-90K demo video to sell the idea for a more lucrative future production and not a bad start considering that little money barely pays to turn on lights or buy donuts.
Reynard said:Considering the whining on this forum about aspects of Traveller not making sense, I'm amazed more don't point to Abrams' Trek.
OK, that makes sense now.Reynard said:If a big production can get it so wrong then a kickstarter for Traveller that sticks truer to the work has my appreciation.
tolcreator said:My main gripe is... the cast looks rather monochrome. Isn't this 3000 years in the future, the Spinward marches a melting pot of every race culture and creed from not only Earth but Vland and a few "Minor" human races too?
simonh said:The teaser is actually a lot better than I was expecting. It's not HBO, but it's far better than the Star Trek fan shows I've seen.