I'd have had no problem going with that except one frickin' shot at 35:12 shows the front beams on the Shadow-Omega moving about. Certainly not as much as the turrets but still noticably moving in about a 20 degree arc. And the Minbari green beams are a PitA, as they sometimes move, sometimes don't and stopped moving by season 4. The Whitestars, of course, seem to only shoot their's directly forward.
Personally I'd say the "moving around factor" is not in the weapon, but in the mount. The WhiteStar was too small to mount it's green beam in anything else then a straight-ahead spinal configuration, while the big minbari ships had the extra room to mount their equivalent of turrets (I presume gravitic lenses that "bend" the beam drom the firing port to strike where they wish). The ShadOmage had turrets, which by definition should have a good arc, while the Shadows have something even better then the Minbari, being able to fire their beam wherever they wish, and shift focus more quickly then everyone else too.
No argument. Frankly, I'm arguing technology more than power. A 44 Magnum and .22 are both pistols using the same technology with vastly different power. I'm not arguing that the beams on the Shadow-Omegas are Shadow strength (although they appear stronger than previous EF weapons) but I am arguing that they may be a weaker example of the same tech used by the Shadows.
Actually I'm too. But I'm saying, if someone claims the fact that the weapon was seen punching a hole through a metal sheet "proves" it was a railgun that this would be an incorrect assumption, as it could have also been a common chemical slugthrower with armor piercing rounds... and I say since it didn't look (one of the most important things we can ever get from the show, because in effect it's most of what it is) like the shadow MSB does mean something.
I find it difficult to argue with the AoG stats, as they were authorized by BP. To my mind, that makes them at least semi-official. However, you do recognize the irony of using the AoG stats for the Shadow-Omega under the argument that they're approved as part of your argument against the AoG stats for the Shadow-Omega which were approved?
Hey, if I can use the official info to prove it doesn't match up...
And I see no difficulty with looking behind the facade of "AoG's semi-official, BP-approved info"; just because someone in a position of authority says it's OK doesn't mean the guy who said that did really think it all through, and thus it doesn't mean it's truly good info. hell, you can't even take the info from the show as "absolutely, perfectly canon", because it has happened that the universe changed it's mind (JMS had a change of mind -DralaFi incident between S-2 and ItB-, someone got an idea and didn't check if it mader some earlier part of the story inplausible -comlink genetic coding which prevents Markus from using Franklins link in S-3 should have prevented Garibaldi using a foreign link in S-1 too- / -AoG fluff giving the Centauri a visit by Technomages a few centuries before they were created according to the later TM trilogy- etc.). So you have to use that brain most people who end up with B5 carry for more then ornamentational value (those people tend to stay at "Star Trek" levels :twisted

, and think about all the info you get to see if it conflicts somewhere. And if you really desire a BG where there are no such causes of "bad logic" hiding to trip you up in front of your players, you have to do what you can to find a solution that meshes with the rest. And if you want to improve the stuff Mongoose puts out you have to offer them your insights, in the hope that someone there will take notice and start thinking about the problem you see too (and maybe, if you're lucky, even sees your solution and says "hey, that's one we could use...")
I'm unsure how to rate this one. The Whitestars have Vorlon derived adaptive armor and we see elaswhere that Shadow beams generally don't slice open Vorlon ships.
Irrelevant. We know even younger race weaponry - hell, even low tech younger race weaponry like stuff the raides have can turn a whitestar into pretty much wreckage, vorlon armor or no. So while it may survive low-powered shadow weaponry like the balls of energy ShadowFighters "spit", it certainly can't even begin to withstand weapons that are much, much more powerful then the best younger race R&D departments can create...
Now, my gut feeling is that this is simply another example of the declining quality of the CGI when NDE got a hold of it but the stuff is up there on screen.
Amen.
2-4 seconds and well within what we've seen the Shadow Battlecrabs fire.
Actually 2-4 seconds sustained is well within what we see from every younger race too. When it gets to fire longer, that is when we get into the "minbari tech and higher" ratings...
Insufficient data. There is one shot where the bow weapons appear to be firing in a repeated fashion.
...and anyway, as the show progresses and CGI seems to degrade in fluff consistence weapons seem to "forget" the recharge time they had earlier (EA Lasers in the final assault during the civil war, Narn Lasers in their assault on Centauri Prime...) So here again we are stumped by the changing nature of the evidence
However, one would think that being able to swing a solid beam around would at least allow a greater hit percentage.
True, one would assume so. And since it doesn't I take this before all AoG data for a indication that the internal works of the Omega hull wasn't altered much if at all. It clearly used an less capable EA tracking system, it cleartly used EA style jump engines... I think they took vanilla omega hulls, exchanged the guns with ones delivered by the Drakh (after all, the very same blue beam effect was usen for Drakh ships in Crusade later on) and grew shadow bio-armor over the mess. Nothing more.
Tough call. We simply don't know what they've got inside. I'm not neccessarily arguing that it has a Shadow reactor, simply that it has the power to power more powerful weapons.
See just above. I prefer to believe that the ship used the standard Omega reactor, it's just that the red laser beams are far less effective in tranferring their assigned power into raw damage output then the drakhy blue beams..., say, if the red laser beams loose 40% in transition, and the blue drakhy beams loose only 10%... that's be a damage plus of 50% from the base EA laser cannon value...
Well, the Excalibur cannon seems much stronger than the typical Vorlon Dreadnought, although again it's a bit tough to tell from the limited evidence.
Inacceptable. However, we only once see a vorlon lightning cannon shoot at full power - then it blows apart a Shadow Cruiser in the opening engagement of "Into the Fire". But everyone who claims that younger race engineers are able to understand a vorlon weapon system well enbough to rebuild it in a mere 7 years should be givin severe electro shock therapy. and those who think these engineers could actuially improve the gun should be locked away in rubber rooms and forced to watch StarTrek for tthe rest of their lives :wink:
Seriously, it's just too implausible. I can accept that the IA engineers found a few pieces of vorlon ships after the dust settled at Coriana, and barely maneged to find out how to link them with their own tech to create the Victory-class "Super gun", but no more, and it should be at best as capable as a standard vorlon gun.
may well be that the tech helpd the researcher out a lot, so for instance it will modify sensors, weapons, or what have you without truly needing to understand it.
Nay to the first part, yay to the second. It wouldn't help a researcher - more likely it'd take over his lab.
But it would be extremely easy to use as "black box" - you don't need to understand it, you just take a ship hull, plug in the instant shady pill, add water and in a week it will ahve grown into a complete shady sub-system, from bio-armor over the entire ship's surface to an super-fast tracking computer system that is drakh-guranteed side-effect free... :wink:
However, that does also mean you can't build the stuff on your own, and are dependent on the shadows giving out their instant technification pills - a way of doing things that we know from the TM trilogy is something from the Shadows handbook.
My pet theory is that the Shadow hybrid was done with a lot of Shadow help but is basically a Shadow ship through and through. The Shadow-Omegas and Warlocks are actual incoproration of Shadow-tech into actual EF ships.
My pet theory (and take note paddy) is that the first ShadOmega was actually the oldest, a test-bed effort to see how merging the techs would go, done at the very beginning of the Clarke/Shady joint venture. Then the project proceeded to the Cerberus-Hybrid, which didn't work out. Then Clarke wanted some toys as ace against Sheridan, so the shadow minions in charge of that cooperation quickly created a couple more ShadOmegas to please him. Then the Shadows left and the project was stopped, the new shipyard where they tried to get a working hybrid done locked up, etc. And then, while the Drakh were planning their vengeance and getting their claws deeper into the centauri, those other mysterious ShadowMinions re-opened their contact lines with certain earthforce personal, and reactivated the project (probably because they needed something from the EA - quite likely they were trying to trump the Drakh in the club of ex-shadow minions...)
Then we should be grateful that Crusade got cancelled because JMS has commented at conventions that we would have seen more Shadow ships in rogue EF hands. However, since it wasn't filmed or written we can probably ignore it!
Or find an explenation that covers all bases, Like my Daar'gon story (I made all this -well, the basic ideas- up during a time when it wasn't certain yet if crusade would continue or end)
Or, as I would argue, the reason that we never saw Shadow-Omegas again nor did we ever see those pesky blue beams again that once that fleet of Shadow-Omegas was destroyed EF couldn't reproduce them. Hence, they had Shadow derived weapons that they didn't fully understand and thus couldn't reproduce them for later ships (not that we have a decent population size to truly know).
I have no problem with that. Just don't take it further then the minimum - if you say the blue beam was a weapon from the shadows arsenal that's too advanced for the EA guys to understand or reproduce I would agree. I just don't think one should assume it was the best and most modern of shadow systems - after all, they have seen millions of years, and during that time probably mothballed more technology then all races of the IA combined have ever invented...
Actually, we don't know that, as the script never explains the source. All that we have are -snip EA officer rant-
Yup, a lot of nice talk... but remember the source. I for one wouldn't take the statement of that officer as fact, just as I wouldn't take anything JMS wrote as text for Londo as fact. And frankly, in that position I'd expect the EA officer in charge to lie to Gideon like a politician during election time...
as well as a description of the cavern -snip-
So, we have some evidence of Shadow influence in the "spiderweb" comment but we have no idea of the origins of the site. Nothing contradicts the idea that EF built the site.
Except logic - they shouldn't be able to do that. Not on their own. Not in that time frame. After a centurty or two study of shadowtech - maybe, after a decade - no way.
Note, they also are experimenting on humans -snip-
Wanna check up a nice connection? Read TM trilogy book three, those things sound very much like the proto-technomage creatures Galen encounters on Z'ha'dum (and whose apperance a technomage could theoretically assume too if he'd manage to unlock the basic shadowtech functions - something which to date only Galen did within living memory)
Only for these sevitosy it seems the tech is in control, while with the 'mages the mind is in control...
Also, note the phrase " shadow-style ship parts" which one presumes would be recognizable to the audience as Shadow tech. That indicates that several years after the Shadows left EF was producing definite Shadow tech and perhaps even Shadow-style ships.
Nope. Just that this base was capable of producing them (which we already know because the Excalibur destroyed the 2267 Hybrid a few scenes earlier - all those pieces must be the parts for the next hybrid. Of course, noone knows for sure how many were already built at this time, or who/what (if could of course also be that the site was fully automated, and basically build these things by itself, the humand just had to supply the cores as CPU and hope they'd stay sane... or needed some mysterious shadow allies again to set up this shop, and properly prepare their chosen cores to avoid thinghs like the cerberus incident...) helped the humans build them...
Again, I think that we're arguing semantics. My sole contention is that this weapon is Shadow-influenced and best seems to fit some variant on th Shadow slicer beam.
Semantics... are like details, they're everything. Because, if you don't really say what you mean, you can never be sure that you mean what you said, don't you think so? (damn, I'm afraid I'm starting to sound as if JMS writes my lines...)
Anyway, yes to the shadow-influenced, no to the slicer beam.
That's fine, call it a Molecular Beam, that would be easiest.
That was my first thought back when I did my initial reevaluation of AoG's ShadOmega, but it sounded too much like the minbari "Molecular Disruptor"; and I didn't want something that could encourage that line of thinking... which is why I choose the next best thing - I took a look at the small beams of AoG's ShadOmega, saw them labelled "Light Multiphased Cutters", thought "hey, the CGI looks just the same for the two beams, just at different beam thickness, so I could go with the second designation" - thought, done, and that's how I arrived at the name "Multiphased beam". Then I thought up a bit of fluff, and came at these MPB's being an earler shadow weapon system that was later developed into two directions - as fast firing light gun (MultiPhasedCutter) and as armor-piercing high-damage heavy gun (MolecularSlicerBeam).
It does make sense, if you think about it... I even made up a B5W SCS with icons based on the idea back then...)
Then lets say that it's fairly similar. I see it as being a simpler explanation that on a ship that has been Shadow influenced that has weapons similar to existing Shadow weapons and that are extremely different from anything that we've seen on an EF vessel that we infer that the weapons are Shadow influenced as well.
Not really similar - the blue beam is as similar to the MSB as every continous beam in the show is similar to the MSB, no more. The only true connection is the fact that the ship firing it is encased with shadow-skin bio-armor. Let's be honest - if the ships had their shadow armor painted over noone would have claimed the blue beams were anything like a slicer beam... so once you seperate the facts you're left with a beam that doesn't act like a slicer, doesn't look like a slicer, and is fired from a gun barrel and not an unspecified point within the shadow skin. And that just doesn't make it a slicer in my book, no more then the minbari green beam is a MSB because it once was seen cutting off the tail of a Sharlin...
They did. What we don't know is the amount of Shadow involvement.
No,
They didn't. Couldn't have. Not alone, as I saw your words indicating - that was what I was objecting to.
What it does give is info that a EF research project with an unknown amount of Shadow involvement was testing ships with slicer beams 2 years before the Shadow Omegas were seen.
No argument there - after all, those Hybrid beams did fill the abovementioned categories for slicer beams. However, that still doesn't make the ShadOmega's blue beams fill those as well. Which is what I'm saying.
And above you my theory about the whys - the Hybrid needed more work, Clarke wanted something, so the guys with that project multiplied their first (tested and working) prototype. But because it had only EA tech innards they couldn't mount true purple MSB's, so they had to find older tech guns that could be supplied by the reactor - the blue beams which also are in use on Drakh warships; even though they had a few purple-firing MSB's lying around for their hybrid project. see - it all sounds logical if you see it like that - sure, a lot of added info and theeorties, but it does explain a lot... which is why I like it, which is why I made it up for my campaign (where y bunch of players would discover it all, and then start playing shadow boxing -no pun intended- against those mysterious other shadow allies, and maybe one day discover what They really want, and why they are so much less confrontational then the Drakh, and so keep on moving behind the scenes...)
Again, I think that the two of us are quibbling with semantics. I have no problem making this weapon inferior to the Battlecrab slicers, doesn't contradict any on-screen evidence and makes some logical sense.
Well, the semantics are important, very important. Because words create thoughts, and thoughts shape reality. And if you give an shady EA ship "Light MSB's" it won't be long before a munchy player says "oh, if light MSB's can be done there's no reason heavy MSB's couldn't be done just as easily" and creates a uber-powered illogical monster (trust me, I have seen them!)
That's one of the reasons why I am so keen on making this distinction - if you were to take a look at the weapon stats I initially suggested to AoG compared to their LMSB:
Light Molecular Slicer Beam
- damage 8d10+8 for 3 turn RoF; 6d10+6 for 2 turn RoF and 4d10+4 per 1 turn RoF, ignores all armor, can be divided into multiple targets.
Heavy Multiphased Beam
- damage 8d10+8 for 3 turn RoF, ignores 2 points of armor.
All other stats remained the same.
I made it less flexible, since we never saw the ShadOmega divide it's beam as the Shadows could, and we never saw it firing many short shots instead of one long beam, and I reduced the armor piercing to something not quite ancient levels, but still above everything else the younger races have ever seen (and since most ships have an armor value of 4-6 it wasn't even a big difference in effect). Everything else I left the same.
That is the scope of the changes I acvocate.
I suppose my concern is that I don't see a hard and fast reason to change established and approved fluff.
Just beacuse an inferior version is already in place does not mean there is no reason to replace it with a better one if the chance arises. Of course I couldn't hope that AoG would officially denounce their old version and enbrace mine, even though it did create a few problems (for one the fact that it led to the assumption that all weapon power was equal in the system, which in turn led to the bad logic that the EA could build a more powerful reactor then the minbari... long story... and for another that it opened the door for everyone and his munchkin brother to put shadowguns on their favorite race which ended in two versions of a shadow-vorlon hybrid "ShadowStar" - one was a joke, but the other was meant seriously by the poor deluded soul... And finally it set a very bad precedent to completely ignore beam color in matching screen showings to B5W weapon systems, something I really dislike...)
Well, then I'm gonna p**s you off! I don't have an issue with making the turret ones lower power versions of the bow cannon, again, no screen evidence to the contrary. I would have a huge problem with inventing another weapon to differntiate the two. If we call the bow cannon a Heavy molecular beam, how about calling those medium or light molecular beams?
I have no problem with AoG's small cannons - only with the "MSB" as large cannon... as I wrote above I basically made my version from the small turrets; I also dropped AoG's "Phasing Pulse Cannons" as the ShadOmega never was seen firing Any kind of pulses... oh, let me juse tell you the changes I made:
AoG ShadOmega weapons layout:
2 Light Molecular Slicer Beams - front;
2 Heavy Phasing Pulse Cannon's - front;
2 Heavy Phasing Pulse Cannon's - aft;
6 Light Multiphased Cutters - starboard
6 Light Multiphased Cutters - port
standard EA omega interceptor suite
My ShadOmega weapons layout:
4 Heavy Multiphased Beams - front;
4 Medium Multiphased Beams - aft;
6 Light Multiphased Beams - starboard
6 Light Multiphased Beams - port
standard EA omega interceptor suite
Now, which sounds better concerning show evidence? And mine had the added benefit of avoiding the quite-a-few-times mentioned minor pitfalls...
As to being alive, there's this comment -snip- At the least, some of the ships' computer core does seem to be alive. Beyond that, we simply don't know how prevalent the tech is throughout the ship. The stuff that does activate is enough to fling the ship all over the place and they couldn't find any of it. So, for all that we know there could be Shadow-tech all through that sucker being controlled by the nexus in the core. Tim Earls, who designed the ship, has confirmed that the Warlock armor is derived from Shadow-tech and later dropped a lot of hints about there being Shadow tech throughout the ship, although he never released the specs that he promised back in 2000 so we don't know any of the details.
Aha. Well, what I meant that the ship certainly isn't alive. The ShadowTech hidden within the ship certainly is of course - that's a defining characteristic of ShadowTech after all.
But we do know something - the tech isn't very prevalent; since neither Ivanova nor her engineers found anything visibly shady (as in "non EA tech looking"). So it can't be a lot of shadow tech
As for Mr. Earls... I have a theory about what he is full of... not something I'd like to mention in public, or anywhere for that matter... but all I really know is that he made a bad name for himself with dropping hints that were completely out of proportion with things we saw in B5 before he came to boost the WhiteStar to 500 meters... frankly I suspect he suffers from a severe case of "phaser envy" and made the warlock as his last, best chance to win those "my starship can beat up your startship" discussions with his fellow CGI artists...
Could be. However, my counter-argument is that someone in EF was fielding Cerebus killing prototypes during the second season and Shadow-Omega hybrids in season 4 before fielding Shadow-tech equipped Warlocks in the same season. I can make a pretty strong case for EF having a fairly advanced Shadow-tech program for several years by season 5.
And I say that's implausible without someone much older doing it for them. See greek scholar example. I have no problem with the EA getting it all as "black box tech" and then trying to use it, in some cases with the same degree of success our greek scholars would ahve with a modern automobile on your typical 21th-century street. But I cannot accept that they magically figure out a technology that is at least a million of years ahead of their current tech level. If someone gave them a manual, they may use it, but unless they do some serious study for at least a few centuries they should have not the slightest idea how to reproduce or alter it.
Now, I agree that this strains belief. However, in B5 a lot of the details just don't make much sense at all. I sincerely wish that JMS had had a vocal and capable technical/military advisor during the run of the show who could have straightened out these details. in many respects I'm kind of glad that Crusade and LotR got canned, since what they would have done to B5 continuity is just scary to contemplate.
Strained belief I can live with - but some things are beyond mere strain.
And I am with you in that wish... oh, what I wouldn'T give to have a time machine so I could travel to JMS's side at the beginning of B5 and join his team to do just that... (and maybe make a few other suggestions - like "a guy in a rubber suit will look like a guy in a rubber suit even if you glue claws on it and call it a Zarg... so try and find something else...")
The Hybrid was a much more capable vessel than the later Shadow Omega, which is what leads me to believe [though Roman will disagree but he and I already know that ] the two programmes aren't necessarily the same, and the "more advanced" programme is the one without Shadow backing.
And I not only hate the very idea, I also find it illogical. You're saying, that the auto-didakt learned more then the university student; while the evolution of human society clearly shows that the opposite is true (as long as the other factors are equal).
I still say that the ShadOmega's were a prototype, and actually first introduces a year or so before the Hybrid to test if there would be any unforseen side effects in such a tech merger, and were only later built in numbers when clarke needed to see some results from this project and the Hybrid didn't work out yet.
Besides, I find it highly suspicious if one claims that two seperate secret organizations are both working on the very same type of project behind the scenes without even knowing of each other...
It'd be like saying that there are two secret organizations in the US each studying, say, UFO's, not knowing of each other but
both controlling every level of the government, and the one who has had only a single piece of hull wreckage to study has reverse-engineered a complete flying saucer while the one who had three crashed UFO's to study and a dozend of allied Vree engineers to help them have barely managed to mount flashing lights on their helicopters...