Other Factions?

msprange said:
Page 2 of the latest issue, if memory serves. . .

If it's that talk of cutting funding from the Land Warrior program, that usually crops up around this time.... Mostly, its the "We don't have enough money to fund these other projects, so we're cutting this really popular one a bit to get the money." ploy that seems to work well with politicians, especially those who have people in thier state who would be effected by the budget cut.
 
Mr Evil said:
msprange said:
Anyone interested in the IDF & Merkavas would do well to read this;

http://www.exile.ru/2006-August-11/a_hezbollah_upon_all_of_thee.html

lol loved this pic

warnerd-merkava.jpg

This guy obviously drunk and drove. Either that or smoked weed and tried to fly. :lol:
 
Hiromoon said:
Yeah..honestly, can we get stuff from reputable sources like Janes, Matt?

I read War Nerd regularly and I have to say I can't remember the last time his assessments were anything other than brutally accurate. It's like comparing chalk and cheese, though. JDW is a review magazine while War Nerd is primarily analysis.
 
*shrugs* Just saying, OB.

Watching that needlenose whiner Anderson Cooper, trying not to state the obvious: Hezbollah is not only winning every round of this fight, but it was bound to win from the start. Get Jane Fonda out in the streets again, spray some pain relief on her saggy old throat, stuff a bullhorn in her liver-spotted hand and have her sing out: "Who needs Ho Chi Minh/Hezbollah is gonna win!"

Tends to make me go elsewhere for analysis.... like talking to actual IDF soldiers....
 
Hiromoon said:
Tends to make me go elsewhere for analysis.... like talking to actual IDF soldiers....

Anyone have any comments on his take on the Apache? He has a major downer on it (and it could serve to somewhat balance out our current specs for it. . .).
 
Which article is that?

Edit:
Nevermind, I found it... He's pretty much spot on about the cover bit... though, it is a desert. The Apache itself was designed around a 'pop up and kill' concept... their lethality isn't anthing to scoff at, but like any whirly bird (including Evil's beloved Hind), dedicated ground fire will bring it down. Now, that ground fire does have to punch through the armor of the Apache or chew up its rotors... lemme dig out a picture.. it's a little bird blade, but the composites the same...

Edit 2:
Okay.... actually, it looks like a Longbow blade, but here you go:

rotor_damage.jpg


Note the honeycomb of material there that makes up the body of the blade.... this gives it a little more durability from groundfire.

Simply put, the way the Apaches were deployed was a mistake, along with a maintenance issue with the sand had grounded them, something I don't think the War Nerd really thought about when he wrote the article.

Additionally, without the longbow package, the Apache itself is a pretty lethal vehicle against infantry who lack any form of real heavy weapons. Small arms and even light machineguns might dissuade an Apache, but it's not going to bring it down right away like a MPAD would.



If you're taking this out to past 2008, check out the Block improvements:
The first of the upgraded Block II Apaches was delivered to the US Army in February 2003. Block II includes upgrades to the digital communications systems to improve communications within the 'tactical internet'.

Block III improvements, slated for 2008 onwards, include increasing digitisation, the joint tactical radio system, enhanced engines and drive systems, capability to control UAVs and new composite rotor blade. The new blades, which successfully completed flight testing in May 2004, increase the Apache's cruise speed, climb rate and payload capability. The Block III System Development and Demonstration (SDD) contract was awarded to Boeing in July 2006.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/apache/

Edit 3: Wow....I shouldn't do this sort of thing this early in the morning...

Lemme summarize... The Apache is, like many US Weapon Systems, is supposed to be used in conjunction with others as part of a Joint Combat Force. The scout helicopters mark targets for the Apaches (this has been supplemented/supplimated by the Longbow) to kill, the Apaches pop up and whack the target. In Iraq, they're kept just off station, within range of any units that need them and they don't tend to operate by themselves.
 
Hiromoon said:
*shrugs* Just saying, OB.

Watching that needlenose whiner Anderson Cooper, trying not to state the obvious: Hezbollah is not only winning every round of this fight, but it was bound to win from the start. Get Jane Fonda out in the streets again, spray some pain relief on her saggy old throat, stuff a bullhorn in her liver-spotted hand and have her sing out: "Who needs Ho Chi Minh/Hezbollah is gonna win!"

Tends to make me go elsewhere for analysis.... like talking to actual IDF soldiers....

Oh, he's an acquired taste, but sometimes I wish some of the TV analysts we see could drag themselves into a little more opinionated honesty. Looking at some of our military it seems you rarely get a worthwhile response until after they have retired. That's the problem. Everybody but everybody seems to be caught up in the world of media spin, no matter what their line of work.
 
Mongoose Old Bear said:
Oh, he's an acquired taste, but sometimes I wish some of the TV analysts we see could drag themselves into a little more opinionated honesty. Looking at some of our military it seems you rarely get a worthwhile response until after they have retired. That's the problem. Everybody but everybody seems to be caught up in the world of media spin, no matter what their line of work.

Completely true...though I did enjoy the military men turned professors at College... political science was AWSOME after that.
 
Hiromoon said:
Mongoose Old Bear said:
Oh, he's an acquired taste, but sometimes I wish some of the TV analysts we see could drag themselves into a little more opinionated honesty. Looking at some of our military it seems you rarely get a worthwhile response until after they have retired. That's the problem. Everybody but everybody seems to be caught up in the world of media spin, no matter what their line of work.

Completely true...though I did enjoy the military men turned professors at College... political science was AWSOME after that.

That's when they are at their best. A wealth of experience and no military career to protect. :wink:
 
Well, I'm not so sure my Relations of the Middle East teacher should have been telling us how a French General, who when drunk, showed him plans for the Israeli Nuclear Reactor and elaborated on how they gave the Israelis the ability to build nukes.

:D
 
Back
Top