Well they're letting us do it for Foreven, aren't they. It'll be interesting to see if anyone else does come up with any other versions of Foreven set in a similar era after the Hells Creek one is released. I have a feeling that they won't.
The OGL side of Traveller is a good license and one that I can see getting a lot more use by third party companies (and indeed, it HAS got a lot more use by them already). The Foreven one... not so useful IMO - personally I think it's too restrictive for doing much with the Charted Space setting. I think it's too obscure a sector, has very little to do with the history of Charted Space, and it's too far off the beaten track to be really interesting to people. I think people would be much better off just using the FUP for that, which lets them publish their take on any sector that is located anywhere in Charted Space for free. OK, so they don't make money off it, but that's what people have been doing with Traveller for the past 30 years anyway so it's not like that's changed.
And I think you're mistaken about what one can or can't do in Foreven. I see nothing restricting you from mentioning or referring to events that happened outside it - you just can't change those events in your product. The question I guess is whether you're allowed to refer to previous versions of Traveller or if you're just stuck with what MGT has said - and if the latter is true then that rules out anybody doing anything in other eras.
It does say that we are not allowed to "Publish material for older and out of print versions of Traveller, and release them commercially." To me that says that you can't publish (for example) a Megatraveller sector that uses Megatraveller rules, but what does that say about publishing a sector that is set in the Megatraveller timeline but that uses the Mongoose Traveller rules (which is what the Hells Creek supplement seems to be)?
And bluntly, dmccoy1693 - you're not Mongoose, and you don't work for them, so you are in no position to be so authoritative about it. I would like answers to these questions directly from Matt or someone else at Mongoose who is in the know.
The OGL side of Traveller is a good license and one that I can see getting a lot more use by third party companies (and indeed, it HAS got a lot more use by them already). The Foreven one... not so useful IMO - personally I think it's too restrictive for doing much with the Charted Space setting. I think it's too obscure a sector, has very little to do with the history of Charted Space, and it's too far off the beaten track to be really interesting to people. I think people would be much better off just using the FUP for that, which lets them publish their take on any sector that is located anywhere in Charted Space for free. OK, so they don't make money off it, but that's what people have been doing with Traveller for the past 30 years anyway so it's not like that's changed.
And I think you're mistaken about what one can or can't do in Foreven. I see nothing restricting you from mentioning or referring to events that happened outside it - you just can't change those events in your product. The question I guess is whether you're allowed to refer to previous versions of Traveller or if you're just stuck with what MGT has said - and if the latter is true then that rules out anybody doing anything in other eras.
It does say that we are not allowed to "Publish material for older and out of print versions of Traveller, and release them commercially." To me that says that you can't publish (for example) a Megatraveller sector that uses Megatraveller rules, but what does that say about publishing a sector that is set in the Megatraveller timeline but that uses the Mongoose Traveller rules (which is what the Hells Creek supplement seems to be)?
And bluntly, dmccoy1693 - you're not Mongoose, and you don't work for them, so you are in no position to be so authoritative about it. I would like answers to these questions directly from Matt or someone else at Mongoose who is in the know.