JMS update pics
- Thread starter prelude_to_war
- Start date
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
tneva82 said:Incidently more and more we hear about this the more I like the sound of it...
Hopefully this one will work out good. Can't wait for the release(whenever that was...Me and my memory
When is it set? Do we know? Pre-Liberation of Centauri Prime sounds likely.
Looking forward to seeing if there will be any new Centauri ships!
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Burger said:
So one of you lets it go and "tag" the other starts? :roll:
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Burger said:
You don't seem able to let it go. Reaverman's unprovoked hounding caused it in the first place. He won't get a thanks from me for dropping something he never should have started.
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Reaverman said:
Look up irony in the dictionary! :lol: :lol: :lol:
emperorpenguin said:When is it set? Do we know? Pre-Liberation of Centauri Prime sounds likely.
Looking forward to seeing if there will be any new Centauri ships!
10 year aniversity(spelling?) of the Alliance so would be around 2271 or thereabout. Since Liberation happened around 2278 definetly before.
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
tneva82 said:
Thank you tneva82.
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Burger said:
Didn't JMS fall out with Michael O'Hare though?
Anyone know if that was true or not?
emperorpenguin said:
Fall out?
They departed after S1 in friendly terms as far as I know. I doubt O'Hare would have come for 3 episodes(albeit very briefly in 1) if there had been major schism between them.
Assuming you can trust JMS it was story purpose why commander was changed. Too much for 1 character to have personal issue on both Minbari war(the 24 hours which was becoming too overbearing) and Shadows(Sheridan's wife as it turns out. Wonder what this would have been with Sinclair? Sakai being captured by shadows and put into ship?).
I have heard no RELIABLE information that there would have been problems between them...Just speculations from that time by B5 fans and that's it.
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
The story I heard (second hand from the ed of SFX) was that Jerry Doyle and Michael O'Hare got into a fight (note you don't see them together in WWE)
That said I don't trust the guy who told me.....
That said I don't trust the guy who told me.....
From JMS's usenet posts:
Today was a very interesting day; today Michael O'Hare returned to the Babylon 5 stages in preparation for shooting the two-parter, which begins tomorrow. Today he came by for his wardrobe fitting and to get his hair trimmed, say hi to folks, and hang out...lunch was me, John Copeland, Michael and Bruce Boxleitner eating together at one of the tables in the lunch area behind the stage, lots of laughing and kidding, and the two get on great.
Assuming he's not lying through his teeth to give a good press image, it sounds like they were getting on fine.
As for Jerry Doyle, well if JMS put them in a scene together, they'd be in a scene together. Professional actors don't ignore the script and director, just because they don't get on! Them not being in a scene together is no proof that they had a fight.
Today was a very interesting day; today Michael O'Hare returned to the Babylon 5 stages in preparation for shooting the two-parter, which begins tomorrow. Today he came by for his wardrobe fitting and to get his hair trimmed, say hi to folks, and hang out...lunch was me, John Copeland, Michael and Bruce Boxleitner eating together at one of the tables in the lunch area behind the stage, lots of laughing and kidding, and the two get on great.
Assuming he's not lying through his teeth to give a good press image, it sounds like they were getting on fine.
As for Jerry Doyle, well if JMS put them in a scene together, they'd be in a scene together. Professional actors don't ignore the script and director, just because they don't get on! Them not being in a scene together is no proof that they had a fight.
