tneva82 said:
Mr Evil said:
"its weird you can buy these games ready painted and cheaper than these kits for kids with warhammer crack habbit"
GW plastic box: 18£ for 10. BF:Evo infantry: 20£ for 8. Cheaper?
Also just because model is painted doesn't mean it's better...
Lieutenant Rasczak said:
Of course its cheaper.
No time to assemble, time is money when working out the cost of an item.
No glue to buy, no paint to buy, no gorram tools or paint brushes to buy!
That arguament doesnt work.
When its a hobby item the time it takes to paint and assemble is part of its inherant value!
And the glue and paint dont magically disappear when your done with them do they?
I can appreciate that some people dont like painting, but at the same time theres alot of people who DO like to paint and assemble.
From a parents point of view the longer their out of your hair doing something constructive the better, and surely it must be conceeded that it is slightly more constructive than xbox?
Added to the fact that people are cherry picking their comparisons.
The battle for skull pass is one of the best value for money items in this market period (Particularly in the US!). Do I personally like the models? No, but trying to act like its cheaper to buy say BF:E or SST than it is to buy that box set is bull.
At best the BF:E minatures are around the same value for money as EE stuff right now.
Is GW expensive? Yes it is, but so is the new mongoose stuff. Is the business model directly geared towards exploiting pester power from the children? Yes but so is pretty much every other item in the youth market.
Are they running the business down the toilet by pushing an inelastic demand curve to its absolute limit? Probably, but they've been doing it for at least ten years so I don't see what the fuss is about?
As for which is more adult oriented, personally I think the evo rules have more depth to them, but thats just personal preferance.