Strom said:
What does 4e have to do with Conan D20?
Not a whole hell of a lot. However edition wars and to a lesser extent, system wars seem to be all the rage on the Internet these days.
I don't begrudge anyone their system of choice. I played D&D, Rolemaster, and GURPS. I posted in GURPS forums, D&D forums, general RPG forums, etc. I talked about my campaigns, stories, adventures, etc. I might mention the system I used but never felt compelled to slam one system over another while doing so. When I wasn't playing D&D, I was buying D&D settings to use. I never felt the compulsion to trash the current edition of D&D while singing the praises of a setting. I used a ruleset that was better for me - no big deal.
These days it seems the trend is "I use System X b/c I can't stomach System Y". Often, that statement encompasses the entire argument/criticism. The fact that people feel the need to make the detracting remarks on "System X's" messageboards sometimes comes across as being tacky to me.
I'm not trying to pick on anyone for expressing their opinion. If you want to discuss the pros AND cons of a system that's cool. If you want to talk about why you picked System X over System Y by illustrating how it satisfies your play style, that's informative. You can do it without throwing another system under the bus. If specifically asked why you didn't pick System X, then the door to criticize is certainly opened.
But when I read post after post of "love the fluff but hate the system" rather than "I buy the books for the fluss b/c I use <name of system>" I wonder what's the point? If potential Conan RPG buyers are bombarded with nothing beyond "D20 bad, System Y good" you're helping to shape a negative perception (rightly or wrongly) of the game as a whole. Obviously, not all Setting-not-System Fans are like this but it seems a lot of vocal ones of later sure are.
Assuming (and yeah, I'm accepting the risks in making that move) that these Setting-not-System fans want those books that contain that great setting info to keep getting published, the manner in which they are going about it makes me think their head is lodged in an unpleasant orifice.
I'm NOT advocating suppressing criticism or giving mindless fanboy support. However, I see little, if any, point in the current debate "strategy". For those who have to state their dislike of d20 (which Conan is only based upon), are you trying to kill the Conan RPG? Are you hoping to see Conan officially using your preferred ruleset? Are you unable to praise your system without bashing another? By Crom, aren't we better than the D&D zealots?