MaxSteiner
Mongoose
Theres no way the US or the UK is willing or able to attack Iran anyway, maybe after 11 years of trade embargo, but up till then its not gonna happen, our missiles cost to much 
EU vs US?
- Thread starter MaxSteiner
- Start date
US against ETF 3 senarios for an start
Senario one
Russian troops Invad Iran and Iraq for the Oil ETF is helping in the hope for some Oil. US Troops are marching for the interest of Detroit.
Senario two Islamic revolution in France and Germany and some places in East Europa. US Troops are trying to stop this.
Senario three Old Rockets still can reach theire Target.
by mistake old ICBMs are Lanched. (they don´t need to have theire old payload) and WW3 is open.
Senario one
Russian troops Invad Iran and Iraq for the Oil ETF is helping in the hope for some Oil. US Troops are marching for the interest of Detroit.
Senario two Islamic revolution in France and Germany and some places in East Europa. US Troops are trying to stop this.
Senario three Old Rockets still can reach theire Target.
by mistake old ICBMs are Lanched. (they don´t need to have theire old payload) and WW3 is open.
Rogue Soldat
Mongoose
Too much CNC Generals? We might as well have a Doctor Thrax leading the Islamic revolution in France.
MaxSteiner said:Theres no way the US or the UK is willing or able to attack Iran anyway, maybe after 11 years of trade embargo, but up till then its not gonna happen, our missiles cost to much
What kind of missile, Max? Cruise missile? That's $1M per missile...give or take.... or at least it was back when Kosovo was active..
MaxSteiner
Mongoose
Any kind of missile, we've managed to completly cycle through our old stock and purchase replacements already, we've gotta wait for the new improved, twice as expensive replacements to come up for sale before we attack a new target
State of the art missiles fired on targets are good value for money (In terms of the total amount plowed back into the M.I complex), standard missiles less so...
State of the art missiles fired on targets are good value for money (In terms of the total amount plowed back into the M.I complex), standard missiles less so...
MaxSteiner
Mongoose
Yeah but its the price increase that funds development of new research, producing new jobs, and driving up fresh foreign export revenue. The business model only works if you completly dump all the existing generation of bombs in time for the next generation.
in terms of payload more bombs were dropped durring Iraq 2 than all of WW2, and so quickly that noone really cared whether they worked or not
Hell Im not even saying its a bad method, but realistically theres no point ofloading all our current stock until the replacements ready to be wheeled out.
Besides, unlike Iraq, Irans got two semi-decently equiped armies, after a couple of years sanctions for trying to make a nuclear power plant maybe but right now?
===>Edit to clarify since Im rather drunk right now:
Simply replacing spent munitions cost alot of money, whereas; replacing spent munitions with the next generations (once you factor in all the econmic benefits of developing said replacements) id actually worthwhile.
in terms of payload more bombs were dropped durring Iraq 2 than all of WW2, and so quickly that noone really cared whether they worked or not
Hell Im not even saying its a bad method, but realistically theres no point ofloading all our current stock until the replacements ready to be wheeled out.
Besides, unlike Iraq, Irans got two semi-decently equiped armies, after a couple of years sanctions for trying to make a nuclear power plant maybe but right now?
===>Edit to clarify since Im rather drunk right now:
Simply replacing spent munitions cost alot of money, whereas; replacing spent munitions with the next generations (once you factor in all the econmic benefits of developing said replacements) id actually worthwhile.
