Eh?

dant164

Mongoose
Something increibly odd about the armageddon ISA white stars.

Raid level white stars dont have Precise on their Molecular pulsars, every other white star (Even the fighters) has precise on the pulsar, is this a book error or is their some kind of explination?
 
dant164 said:
Something increibly odd about the armageddon ISA white stars.

Raid level white stars dont have Precise on their Molecular pulsars, every other white star (Even the fighters) has precise on the pulsar, is this a book error or is their some kind of explination?

This was done on purpose as the SFOS Whitestar was considered too good for it's PL level.


Dave
 
Davesaint said:
dant164 said:
Something increibly odd about the armageddon ISA white stars.

Raid level white stars dont have Precise on their Molecular pulsars, every other white star (Even the fighters) has precise on the pulsar, is this a book error or is their some kind of explination?

This was done on purpose as the SFOS Whitestar was considered too good for it's PL level.


Dave

No, they got well nerfed
 
they lost an AD as well so they pretty hard fighting any ships with interceptors now. having to rely on 1AD beam, and ask how many narn players take ka'tans over ka'tocs because of 1AD beams.
 
Thats it

Ive had enough

Enough already with this Armageddon BS

I play both EA and ISA, EA lost their best war choice and ISA white stars got screwed over.

ENOUGH ALREADY

Im sticking with SFOS.


Yeah im slightly annoyed.... :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
 
Yes.

Losing 1 AD totally nerfs the ship versus interceptors....

whut? Whatever happened to the wolfpack tactics of WS players?

Ive watched a game of WS vs Chronos. Yes the first WS lost its pulsar fire, but after that it was all over for interceptor like goodiness.

Plus WS get nials to wear down interceptors before the WS itself fires. Armageddon hands you a solution to a problem.

And the SFOS one wasnt considered to be too good. It was too good. Rarely saw it lose a battle. If WS can make standing right in front of Tinashis a viable tactic something is wrong!
 
dant164 said:
Thats it

Ive had enough

Enough already with this Armageddon BS

I play both EA and ISA, EA lost their best war choice and ISA white stars got screwed over.

ENOUGH ALREADY

Im sticking with SFOS.


Yeah im slightly annoyed.... :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
White Stars got brought back in line with where every Raid level ship should be. There are other overpowered ships but they're the ones broken, not the White Star any more!

Frankly, you're overreacting unless the only reason you took them was because they were too good!
 
Its not loosing the AD, i honestly didnt notice it

Im upset about the drop in dodge and the loss of precise on the pulsars, so they cant cause have as many crits anymore.

As it is white stars now fall prey to stray fighters because their dodge got laughably reduced
 
dant164 said:
Its not loosing the AD, i honestly didnt notice it

Im upset about the drop in dodge and the loss of precise on the pulsars, so they cant cause have as many crits anymore.

As it is white stars now fall prey to stray fighters because their dodge got laughably reduced
They were just about the best ship in the game (barring the Tigara) before the changes. Now they are widely considered to be just about balanced. They may have a little less firepower than average and survivability is still slightly better than average but that's where their speed and manoeuvrability comes in to make sure the enemy can't hit them.
 
Triggy said:
dant164 said:
Thats it

Ive had enough

Enough already with this Armageddon BS

I play both EA and ISA, EA lost their best war choice and ISA white stars got screwed over.

ENOUGH ALREADY

Im sticking with SFOS.


Yeah im slightly annoyed.... :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
White Stars got brought back in line with where every Raid level ship should be. There are other overpowered ships but they're the ones broken, not the White Star any more!

Frankly, you're overreacting unless the only reason you took them was because they were too good!


Over reacting?

I wouldnt mind about the loss of the AD i wouldnt mind if it didnt have fighters, but why take precise and lower the dodge.

Straight comparison between the Armageddon Whtie star and the EA chronos

Hull: Chronos has 1 point higher hull Chronos 1 point

Damage: On the surface the chronos is higher but the 4+ dodge effectively doubles the white stars dammage and crew, then its effectively doubled again by adaptive armour White Star 1 point

Traits: Chronos packs 3 interceptors, White star packs Adaptive Armour (Mentioned Above) Flight computer and AJP, not really interested in the self repair. 1 point all

Weapons: This is the dodgy part and i will probably come under fire for it (Pun not intended)

The White star sports a TD, SAP, Precise beam and the now reduced molecular pulsars, sounds good dont it?

The Chronos sports all round firepower including a turreted main weapon, which means within 12" the chronos should be able to CAF to its hearts content

Matter of opinion but id say the Chronos wins out on that one.... A lot...

Current Score: 2 White star, 3 Chronos

There are other mitigating factors, the white stars are faster, however that can be a detrement as you overfly your target, have to turn around and therefore loose out on caffing that 1 AD beam. The Chronos carries 4 troops so is better at defending against a boarding action.

Overall id say the chronos wins out against the new white stars.
 
What are they, dodge 4+, hull 5, adaptive armour? Probably the best-protected ship at raid level going. Even patrol ships don't have a dodge that good, it's 5+ for the Centauri Haven, and the skirmish level Kutai, and they don't have adaptive armour.
 
dant164 said:
Triggy said:
dant164 said:
Thats it

Ive had enough

Enough already with this Armageddon BS

I play both EA and ISA, EA lost their best war choice and ISA white stars got screwed over.

ENOUGH ALREADY

Im sticking with SFOS.


Yeah im slightly annoyed.... :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
White Stars got brought back in line with where every Raid level ship should be. There are other overpowered ships but they're the ones broken, not the White Star any more!

Frankly, you're overreacting unless the only reason you took them was because they were too good!


Over reacting?

I wouldnt mind about the loss of the AD i wouldnt mind if it didnt have fighters, but why take precise and lower the dodge.

Straight comparison between the Armageddon Whtie star and the EA chronos

Hull: Chronos has 1 point higher hull Chronos 1 point

Damage: On the surface the chronos is higher but the 4+ dodge effectively doubles the white stars dammage and crew, then its effectively doubled again by adaptive armour White Star 1 point

Traits: Chronos packs 3 interceptors, White star packs Adaptive Armour (Mentioned Above) Flight computer and AJP, not really interested in the self repair. 1 point all

Weapons: This is the dodgy part and i will probably come under fire for it (Pun not intended)

The White star sports a TD, SAP, Precise beam and the now reduced molecular pulsars, sounds good dont it?

The Chronos sports all round firepower including a turreted main weapon, which means within 12" the chronos should be able to CAF to its hearts content

Matter of opinion but id say the Chronos wins out on that one.... A lot...

Current Score: 2 White star, 3 Chronos

There are other mitigating factors, the white stars are faster, however that can be a detrement as you overfly your target, have to turn around and therefore loose out on caffing that 1 AD beam. The Chronos carries 4 troops so is better at defending against a boarding action.

Overall id say the chronos wins out against the new white stars.

AH! you forget than the WS have a Nial figther and adv Jump point, the Chronos don't. :roll:
 
Uh I think the speed and maneuverability are more than just a 'tie'. White Stars are almost like fighters in their ability to get into arcs the enemy has no weapons in.
 
Chronos has twinlinked in nearly every arc, so it doesn't get a whole lot from CAF that it doesn't already.
And I thought the Tournament specs for the white star were pretty good, didn't see the need to drop AD, and Precise AND the dodge, dropping the dodge a touch was pretty decent by itself.

Chern
 
I thought there was a post about Army that errataed the whitestar to give it back it's 'missing' AD, though I didn't see anything about the precise.
 
dant164 said:
Triggy said:
dant164 said:
Thats it

Ive had enough

Enough already with this Armageddon BS

I play both EA and ISA, EA lost their best war choice and ISA white stars got screwed over.

ENOUGH ALREADY

Im sticking with SFOS.


Yeah im slightly annoyed.... :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
White Stars got brought back in line with where every Raid level ship should be. There are other overpowered ships but they're the ones broken, not the White Star any more!

Frankly, you're overreacting unless the only reason you took them was because they were too good!


Over reacting?

I wouldnt mind about the loss of the AD i wouldnt mind if it didnt have fighters, but why take precise and lower the dodge.

Straight comparison between the Armageddon Whtie star and the EA chronos

Hull: Chronos has 1 point higher hull Chronos 1 point

Damage: On the surface the chronos is higher but the 4+ dodge effectively doubles the white stars dammage and crew, then its effectively doubled again by adaptive armour White Star 1 point

Traits: Chronos packs 3 interceptors, White star packs Adaptive Armour (Mentioned Above) Flight computer and AJP, not really interested in the self repair. 1 point all

Weapons: This is the dodgy part and i will probably come under fire for it (Pun not intended)

The White star sports a TD, SAP, Precise beam and the now reduced molecular pulsars, sounds good dont it?

The Chronos sports all round firepower including a turreted main weapon, which means within 12" the chronos should be able to CAF to its hearts content

Matter of opinion but id say the Chronos wins out on that one.... A lot...

Current Score: 2 White star, 3 Chronos

There are other mitigating factors, the white stars are faster, however that can be a detrement as you overfly your target, have to turn around and therefore loose out on caffing that 1 AD beam. The Chronos carries 4 troops so is better at defending against a boarding action.

Overall id say the chronos wins out against the new white stars.


Dant,

I won a Tournament with 16 people in it over the summer with this version of the Whitestar. You just need to be a little more careful with it.


Dave
 
Before the change, I've never seen an ISA fleet lose a campaign battle. The fleet that was in our campaign steamrolled one world after another.

Now they seem about balanced. I'd venture to say the White Star is still one of the best Raid choices in the game due to its Flight Computer, Adaptive Armor, high speed and insane maneuvreability. The fact of the matter is, in my opinion, is that the ship dished out simply too much firepower and was too tough to take down.

As to the White Star vs Chronos debate, I've seen a Chronos-based fleet beat White Stars one time. The White Stars simply dominated the rest of them.

I think they are less of a "no-brains" fleet to play now. You can't simply rush down your opponents throat relying on an insane dodge save to keep you alive while you pound his ships with beams and pulsars.
 
Has everyone forgotten that the old tourney WS was considered to be balanced? The Armageddon stats are exactly the same as that, except with an 18" main weapon.
 
yep. I personally think the Arma whitestar is fine I think it would still be fine with precice pulsars or even all 5 precice pulsars (though I think 4 with precice would be better).

But as someone whos played ISA in various forms over the last couple of years and EA too, frankly interceptors are only a viable defence if your opponent is silly enough to try and take out lots of ships at onc. Focus on one at a time and watch them burn...

And the WS should have had 4+ dodge from the start, 3+ was ridiculous (though dont forget it was 5+ originally!)
 
Back
Top