SteveMND said:No, I realize that preindustrial/pre-rennasiance peoples also traveled, I was just suggesting that the distances involved were less than we as modern folks deal with (after all, a 1/2 hour car drive was an all-day trip for most folks prior to automobiles), and as such, you don't need the same sort of large spans to seperate distinct cultures; a smaller 'continent' will suffice just fine.
Well, if you measure the time/distance ratio, then it is true. But they did travel as long and far as we do. It just took a lot more time. And it is important to remember that there was a different pace to life at that time. If it took two or three weeks to get to the destination, there was not much of a difference.
Basically only those who were true farmers exclusively lived a life that was a bit more fast-paced, as they had to consider seasons etc. to get the best benefits of the years harvest.
It is also important to not miss the importance of travels at sea. Even if it was travel that was relatively close to the shore, they traveled great distances.
There are some indiciations that greece merchants has been even up where I live (sweden), and it is known that the swedish vikings traveled to vinland (north amerika), but mostly all along the coasts of europe. They even were mercenaries to some persian king whose name I can not remember at the moment.
But this recorded movement occured during the "iron age", basically shortly before the fall of the roman empire. If we go even further back in time, to the bronze age, you will find that we have large groups of people who are semi-nomadic, and as such, travels quite far.
Interaction between ancient cultures is something historians are beginning to reconsider. It constantly appears proof that there was much more contact, interaction, between cultures with great distances between them, than we ever imagined.
Considering the difficulties to travel at sea, and the vessels they used, it is rather amazing.
If we exclude travel by sea, we still have a lot of movement going on. Especially as the roman empire spread. With the roman empire came roads, which greatly eased the troubles of travel. Through waystations and outriders, these roads also were a quite a bit more safe than travel through the wilderness.
It is important to note, that it is not really until the early middle ages, when we have really true farming cultures that people stayed in one place for a very long time, and they did not travel as much as before.
During the whole span of the roman empire, there was stability that made travel possible. And before that, most cultures were not fully farm communities, but semi-nomadic, or complemented their farming with a lot of hunting, or even trading. All which required travel.
Some really far fetched theories even say that the cultures around the mediterranean had contact with bronze age china. But considering the vessels used in this time, it is a theory that currently has not a shred of evidence, and seems all too impossible to accomplish.
But then, so was the idea of the vikings reaching northern america. So I guess anything is possible, if very improbable.