Loz
Mongoose
And yes, Lawrence is still very much with us and currently working on awesomeness.
[Looks up from current Awesomeness Project]
Yep, still here.
[/Gets back to current Awesomeness Project]
And yes, Lawrence is still very much with us and currently working on awesomeness.
Demetrio said:I'd add that I'm not certain the license holders are exactly playing underhanded games. They might be wrong, but their aim will be to maximise the money they can make from granting the license.
Strom said:Personally, I think if Mongoose keeps the license the future of Conan is RQ. The writing is on the wall and RQ Conan isn't just an idea anymore.
flatscan said:PrinceYyrkoon said:And I dont understand people who play the D20 version saying they wouldnt touch a RQ version of Conan. Seems ridiculous to me.
???
It seems ridiculous to you that some of us thoroughly enjoy the d20 Conan game we have with the 40+ books released for the line (1e, Atlantean, 2e) and hundreds of hours invested in playing with a steady set of characters and would not be willing to chuck all that out the window in order to play in the same world with a vastly different system? I know you love RQ, but c'mon man.
PrinceYyrkoon said:flatscan said:PrinceYyrkoon said:And I dont understand people who play the D20 version saying they wouldnt touch a RQ version of Conan. Seems ridiculous to me.
???
It seems ridiculous to you that some of us thoroughly enjoy the d20 Conan game we have with the 40+ books released for the line (1e, Atlantean, 2e) and hundreds of hours invested in playing with a steady set of characters and would not be willing to chuck all that out the window in order to play in the same world with a vastly different system? I know you love RQ, but c'mon man.
Hello flatscan. I said to see if you would respond! :lol:
I understand the point of view, investment, etc., but Im not naturally thrilled by D20 but Ive learned to live with it, partly because of the great job thats been done on it as an engine for Conan. To say, flatly, that you would have no interest at all in Mongoose Conan anymore, merely because of the different engine, (regardless of the quality of of the product), seems a bit radical.
Its a moot point now anyway. I fear the worst, and the worst is Mongoose losing the licence and were left with a horrible movie tie-in, with a simplistic game book that has lots of pretty movie stills in it done by a company noone has heard of.
Scorpion13 said:And I have to say Im getting a little annoyed at this attitude of yours that d20 fans have to grow up and move on to "better" RPG systems like Runequest. I havent seen anybody wish death on a RQ Conan. All Ive heard them say is that they wouldnt be interested in playing it. You constantly are saying its time for everyone to "grow up" and play RQ because its the "future".
flatscan said:Yeah, that's something that bugs me about this as well. In past threads Matt was asked point blank if the wait was due to a system change and he said no. But obviously a system change was being worked on. So would there had still been d20 releases or would it have been MRQ and SW supported by some system-less stuff? I still think it sucks that Mongoose was dealt a hand like this from the license holder, but at the same time, I kinda feel like I was lied to months ago.
msprange said:After agreeing our new plans for Conan a few months ago, the licence holders contacted us seven days before the core development was due to start to tell us that they had decided we should not proceed.
Conan would have been released as a setting for RuneQuest
bound in real leather with a reptilian finish - not as a limited edition, but as standard across the entire Conan range. The interior would have been in full colour.
with Gareth Hanrahan to be unleashed on the Slaves of Turan, a new epic.
we had commissioned Vincent Darlage to write a 13 volume atlas to Conan's world - systemless or near systemless, so _all_ Conan players could use them. At around 200 pages each, the detail Vincent was going into was just incredible
working alongside Pinnacle and one of our Flaming Cobra studios to produce a full colour Savage Worlds Conan book, giving you three different choices on how you want to play Conan.
Kev said:I just find it all a bit too much to credit. Again, if this is what y'all had planned and were, in fact, working on...holy crap, it woulda been awesome by every definition of that word! :shock: Maybe I'm just in shock and denial. And maybe this is just the eternal pessimist in me but I can't help but feel that you're just pulling our collective leg. Yeah, so there's licensing issues resulting in a change/halt in momentum with the line. That I can understand but as for the rest...really?
zozotroll said:I can understand not wanting to play a game in certain systems, after all I wouuld not play Conan in 4E. And I wont play GURPS either. I have many of the books, and figured out it is just not for me.
So why should I not allow others the same sort of choice?