Are the EFTF getting stuffed?

Gibbs said:
Why not just claim everything north of the greater thames area... except for Wales of course. I want to see the United Socialist Republic of Wales established! :lol:

Quite simply, we don't want it.... would take from the mouth of the humber up across leeds and then from there to the bottom of the lakes, what would we want with mankchester or liverpool, nevermind anything south of that.
 
cordas said:
Gibbs said:
Why not just claim everything north of the greater thames area... except for Wales of course. I want to see the United Socialist Republic of Wales established! :lol:

Quite simply, we don't want it.... would take from the mouth of the humber up across leeds and then from there to the bottom of the lakes, what would we want with mankchester or liverpool, nevermind anything south of that.

You obviously aren't a student of the finer military tactics. You need a shield to protect north of the humber. So what if Manchester and Liverpool are taken, they were there to act as a first line of defence, that way you can absorb an attack and reverse the attack quickly by moving units over the humber. Think of it as an early warning area. :wink:
 
Gibbs said:
cordas said:
Gibbs said:
Why not just claim everything north of the greater thames area... except for Wales of course. I want to see the United Socialist Republic of Wales established! :lol:

Quite simply, we don't want it.... would take from the mouth of the humber up across leeds and then from there to the bottom of the lakes, what would we want with mankchester or liverpool, nevermind anything south of that.

You obviously aren't a student of the finer military tactics. You need a shield to protect north of the humber. So what if Manchester and Liverpool are taken, they were there to act as a first line of defence, that way you can absorb an attack and reverse the attack quickly by moving units over the humber. Think of it as an early warning area. :wink:

My plan would be to reduce those area's to toxic wastelands (worse than they already are) where noone would want to go, and nuke london. Or idealy just cut off the south and sink it ;)
 
cordas said:
Gibbs said:
cordas said:
Quite simply, we don't want it.... would take from the mouth of the humber up across leeds and then from there to the bottom of the lakes, what would we want with mankchester or liverpool, nevermind anything south of that.

You obviously aren't a student of the finer military tactics. You need a shield to protect north of the humber. So what if Manchester and Liverpool are taken, they were there to act as a first line of defence, that way you can absorb an attack and reverse the attack quickly by moving units over the humber. Think of it as an early warning area. :wink:

My plan would be to reduce those area's to toxic wastelands (worse than they already are) where noone would want to go, and nuke london. Or idealy just cut off the south and sink it ;)

Sounds like a plan... what are you going to do about Wales then?
 
Back
Top