EDG said:
alex_greene said:
Exactly. Given that they most likely weren't anything remotely like modern Homo Sapiens when they were kidnapped by the Ancients (I think they were actually Homo Erectus at that stage).
I'll admit my memory is hazy, but I think at 300,000 years ago or so, there would have been possibly Neanderthal Man and maybe Homo heidelbergensis. At the time of the LBB's, Neanderthal may have been considered Homo Sapiens and not a seperate species. Homo heidelbergensis I'm a bit less clear about, but they may have been considered an archaic Homo sapiens species too. I do want to say that Homo heidelbergensis' brain volume overlaps modern Homo Sapiens also..their upper end of brain volume comes within our average brain volume.
So, if I am right (which I know I might not be at all), at the time of the LBB's one or both species that (I think) were around then were seen as sub species of Homo Sapiens instead.
But yes, I always did feel that the Vilani, Zhodani and the minor human races as a whole were a bit TOO "Homo Sapien" given the amount of time, they should be their own distinct species instead.
Having said that, here's an attempt to depict a Neanderthal child:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neanderthal_child.jpg
Cut and comb that kid's hair, and would he look THAT different from any other child if you just gave him a casual glance? Neanderthal is currently considered a different species. So maybe after 300,000 years there wouldn't be THAT Much of a difference. If the reconstruction done there is accurate at all (of course, how can we really know...), then well..that kid could be dressed in modern clothing, given a modern hairstyle and if raised like a modern child pass as well...just another kid.