Chernobyl said:according to this, it was the illinois not the louisiana. Louisiana would have been BB-71, the last of the Montana's.
Chern
knuckles said:Very good Bus, most of it as per the link although can I pick you up on LOA is listed as 887 feet not 888 feet, better luck next time.![]()
BuShips said:knuckles said:Very good Bus, most of it as per the link although can I pick you up on LOA is listed as 887 feet not 888 feet, better luck next time.![]()
OK, I'm going to peek now at the link. FYI there are many references that attribute them with 888' as much as some saying 887'. It must be the difference when in warm tropical waters or cold arctic waters, lol.
While I've never seen these particular ones, I have collected a lot of these Japanese collectable box sets, and generally they are excellent little models very well painted (much better than WizKids will ever achieve!). However, they are to a constant scale (there's another collection on Hobby Link Japan with all the ships together on a table), I'd bet against waterline (they're too simple, usually), and of limited availability (the other set are discontinued already). They're also usually a fairly soft plastic, but that's not a problem, and require minimal assembly (not a problem except touching up the paint where you have to seperate parts from the sprue).VonTed said:Has anyone seen these in real life before? The Furuta Warship Collection. They look good, but I am wondering if they relly are, and if they are only for static display... or if you can make them waterline models.
VonTed said:Has anyone seen these in real life before? The Furuta Warship Collection. They look good, but I am wondering if they relly are, and if they are only for static display... or if you can make them waterline models.
eg.
![]()
Burger said:Has anyone seen Hallmark 1:6000 ships IRL, they will be pretty small obviously but whats the quality like? The only pic I can find online is a PDF that says they are quite good, but the pictures are horribly blurry and pixellated.
Itkovian said:Burger said:Has anyone seen Hallmark 1:6000 ships IRL, they will be pretty small obviously but whats the quality like? The only pic I can find online is a PDF that says they are quite good, but the pictures are horribly blurry and pixellated.
As I own about 100 of the things I can answer yes, the quality is pretty good, their merchantmen even have masts and even with a ham fisted painter (that'd be me) they come out pretty well.
Cheap too.
DM said:Hopefully the two "York" Class cruisers are actually different models (there were some noticeable differences between Yoirk and Exeter)
(I actually own two Exeters, one in "River Plate" scheme, the other in a "Java Sea" scheme, and two Bismarcks for similar reasons)
Reaverman said:Here some more GHQ mini's I got delivered this morning
![]()
Painted mini-'York Class' HMS Exeter
Top Unpainted trio-'J' Class Destroyers
Middle right- 'U' Class Submarines
Bottom trio-'Tribal' Class Destroyers
To give you some idea of scale, the subs, are on 3cm x 1cm bases. Any finer scales, and you might as well use flash![]()
Jellicoe said:What exactly are you using as your bases?
Reaverman said:Jellicoe said:What exactly are you using as your bases?
Well I was thinking of Cylon Base Stars......only kidding![]()
1mm thick plasticard
Jellicoe said:Reaverman said:Jellicoe said:What exactly are you using as your bases?
Well I was thinking of Cylon Base Stars......only kidding![]()
1mm thick plasticard
Kind of difficult for a ship to dock with though![]()
Locutus9956 said:I dont actually base mine at all, after all theyre nice and flat bottomed already and you measure from a point so I figured, why bother?
(I intend to make a nice sea table sometime anyway)
Locutus9956 said:I dont actually base mine at all, after all theyre nice and flat bottomed already and you measure from a point so I figured, why bother?
(I intend to make a nice sea table sometime anyway)