dmccoy1693
Cosmic Mongoose
So this is a thing...
It's a Facebook thing for now. Check their game site for when it shows up there.hiro said:Mr McCoy,
Pray tell kind sir, from where didst thou recover said image?
The Book of Face is a cult to which I pay no homage.
Is there a resource where your humble correspondent might find respite?
Yours in admiration,
Hiro Protagonist III
ARF ARF ARF
Too true. In my own head, my Traveller campaign is basically a facsimile of Star Wars (the original, at least).Of course one can use Traveller to play around in the Star Wars universe or other scifi universes, just won’t have all the official support material.
I agree that the game - in terms of basic accessibility and rules - is fine. However, I think that the appeal can broaden with some appraisal of the presentation, a general tidy-up of the systems in practice, and an open attitude towards having a multi-media approach to the game.ShawnDriscoll said:FFG Star Wars is more like a boardgame, but without a board, when compared to tabletop RPGs. Just watch any game of it being played.
Traveller, in general, still has the "problem" of not having XP, hit points, and leveling up. Oh, and red dragons. But that is a whole other demographic. Mongoose Traveller is the best written iteration of the game. Anyone can understand what it does and how it works. If they still aren't interested in playing it, they simply were not meant for Traveller is all. The game should not alter or morph, or lose its integrity, to appeal to such people. If previous and future versions of Traveller have not succeeded in attracting the general public, it’s best if Mongoose just continues focusing on improving the core rules for its next edition.
That's the only way I do Star Wars settings.AndrewW said:Of course one can use Traveller to play around in the Star Wars universe or other scifi universes, just wont have all the official support material.
That's why I make videos. New future players every week are hearing about this game.TrippyHippy said:there are a whole bunch of gamers out there that have no conception about what a roleplaying game is or how you do it. Let’s educate them!
Good on ya.ShawnDriscoll said:That's why I make videos. New future players every week are hearing about this game.
What a waste. That's like going to a restaurant and talking about nothing but the decor.ShawnDriscoll said:What's the first thing players rave about when reviewing an RPG on YouTube? The artwork.
Ha! You're funny. I see what you mean though. But the general public puts RPG books back on the shelves if the artwork isn't there. Me personally though, I'd rather see quality role-players at my Traveller games than chuckleheads.alex_greene said:What a waste. That's like going to a restaurant and talking about nothing but the decor.ShawnDriscoll said:What's the first thing players rave about when reviewing an RPG on YouTube? The artwork.
ShawnDriscoll said:The artwork. They go on about. That's not possible with Traveller books, other than Chthonian Stars.
Do you do people? And are they in color?middenface said:I disagree that Cthonian Stars is the only good one. There are others. (For the record I like it)
I'm guessing you don't like my work, what is it you don't like?
No. I can't do people. Just ships and space scenes as a hobby only. There's too much of that art already. And I ask for too much money, also. That's one reason why you don't see my stuff published. If I'm in a good mood though, I give away art for people to use/download. So technically, it has appeared in (non-)Traveller books/mags.middenface said:Have you considered doing your own book or getting something published? You are an artist yourself, so why not ?
I like the cover for Orbital you did. 2001-ish looking. I mention it in one or two of my videos. I'm trying to think if I've seen any of your other books shown or mentioned in a video by a reviewer or similar. I did see a deckplan you did on YouTube. I don't use deckplans.middenface said:Alex is correct though. It's not just about the art.