If you want to go back to nature and live in cave like Early Man, then you'll be lucky to reach 40! Of the things that usually kill you, nature is one of the leading causes Putting off or slowing down aging is a way of cheating nature and that by definition is unnatural. For instance, the Black Death was perfectly natural, but many people died from it. Most of the people who died in the Black Death did not live in an industrial society like we do today. Going back to nature is no way to live to 125! Really old people live in nursing homes and need lots of medical attention, that is how they stay alive as long as they do after all.Solomani666 said:They may be healthy in old age but they will still die by 125 years old due to an artificial limit that has been placed on the human species.
The way things are going with GMO's, depleted soil, artificial everything, fluoride, chlorine, marginal cloud cover, pollutants and general stress, even 125 is a far stretch.
.
We need to break the biological code, we haven't mastered the biology of perpetual living, and eating all the whole wheat grains in the world is not going to do it. I find that lots of exercise increases the chance of injury, so you trade of heart attacks for arthritis, broken bones, and pulled muscles.Condottiere said:Drugs will only form one leg of human longevity.
Tom Kalbfus said:If you want to go back to nature and live in cave like Early Man, then you'll be lucky to reach 40! Of the things that usually kill you, nature is one of the leading causes Putting off or slowing down aging is a way of cheating nature and that by definition is unnatural. For instance, the Black Death was perfectly natural, but many people died from it. Most of the people who died in the Black Death did not live in an industrial society like we do today. Going back to nature is no way to live to 125! Really old people live in nursing homes and need lots of medical attention, that is how they stay alive as long as they do after all.Solomani666 said:They may be healthy in old age but they will still die by 125 years old due to an artificial limit that has been placed on the human species.
The way things are going with GMO's, depleted soil, artificial everything, fluoride, chlorine, marginal cloud cover, pollutants and general stress, even 125 is a far stretch.
.
Tom Kalbfus said:We need to break the biological code, we haven't mastered the biology of perpetual living, and eating all the whole wheat grains in the world is not going to do it. I find that lots of exercise increases the chance of injury, so you trade of heart attacks for arthritis, broken bones, and pulled muscles.Condottiere said:Drugs will only form one leg of human longevity.
Tom Kalbfus said:We need to break the biological code, we haven't mastered the biology of perpetual living, and eating all the whole wheat grains in the world is not going to do it. I find that lots of exercise increases the chance of injury, so you trade of heart attacks for arthritis, broken bones, and pulled muscles.Condottiere said:Drugs will only form one leg of human longevity.
Jame Rowe said:Nor should we. The reason the old die is to make room for the young, especially with our limited resources. Creating longevity using medicine and lifestyle changes is good, but if we live forever we doom ourselves and our descendants to a life of poverty.
(Of course, we still need the old to teach the young. But the young deserve a chance to become the old wise ones who pass on to the new young.)
Tom Kalbfus said:We need to break the biological code, we haven't mastered the biology of perpetual living, and eating all the whole wheat grains in the world is not going to do it. I find that lots of exercise increases the chance of injury, so you trade of heart attacks for arthritis, broken bones, and pulled muscles.Condottiere said:Drugs will only form one leg of human longevity.
A lot of Travellers live off their annual pension and their mustering out benefits. Traveller's not about contributing or zero sum games. It's about adventuring.Condottiere said:As long as you continue to directly contribute to the GDP, rather than live off your government pension, it doesn't become a zero sum game.
Condottiere said:As long as you continue to directly contribute to the GDP, rather than live off your government pension, it doesn't become a zero sum game.
Condottiere said:The issue is about longevity in general.
Pensions were introduced because you wouldn't be capable physically to continue to support yourself and your dependants financially.
If you're hale and hearty, that's no longer necessary.