MasterGwydion
Emperor Mongoose
CSC vs RH discrepancy.
CSC pg 92 under anagathics withdrawal,
"Anagathics are always expensive, often illegal and are based on a variety of methods. These include synthetic molecules, exotic biology and nanomachinery. All of these pause the aging process but once a Traveller begins an anagathics regimen they must remain on the same treatment. Failure to continue the treatment can have side effects beyond the resumption of aging"
RH pg 84
"Unlike anagathics, ceasing nanorobot treatment will not cause an adverse reaction but after 20 years of use, medical nanorobots begin to lose effectiveness, becoming one TL less effective at reducing aging.
CSC describes nanomachinery as an anagathic which is subject to withdrawal symptoms.
RH specifically says that medical nanomachinery does not stop aging completely or cause withdrawal symptoms.
Why are nanomeds considered an anagathics in CSC, but not in RH?
CSC pg 92 under anagathics withdrawal,
"Anagathics are always expensive, often illegal and are based on a variety of methods. These include synthetic molecules, exotic biology and nanomachinery. All of these pause the aging process but once a Traveller begins an anagathics regimen they must remain on the same treatment. Failure to continue the treatment can have side effects beyond the resumption of aging"
RH pg 84
"Unlike anagathics, ceasing nanorobot treatment will not cause an adverse reaction but after 20 years of use, medical nanorobots begin to lose effectiveness, becoming one TL less effective at reducing aging.
CSC describes nanomachinery as an anagathic which is subject to withdrawal symptoms.
RH specifically says that medical nanomachinery does not stop aging completely or cause withdrawal symptoms.
Why are nanomeds considered an anagathics in CSC, but not in RH?