captainjack23
Cosmic Mongoose
Okay. THIS is the file with 100K summary results. For those of you who caught my earlier (brief) post, you'll notice that this DOES have 100K planets (+2, actually).
See, I made what we statistical types call a Type VI error : Failure to send the correct file.
Okay, so I ran off 100K planets last night by MGP rules. The below is the basic summary data. For % just lop off the last two digits.
Caveats Mentor:
1. The list is generated with my best attempt at pure 3.2; ie the document + Gar's explicit clarifications (In worlds and Pop 0 worlds)
2. No, i didn't comb this data or code to journal review standards - I have other things to do next week....
3. With this size sample, duplicate uWps will pop up, tweaking the results somewhat.
4. Why so many ? Well, it was about as easy as running 10,000, looks cooler, and provides a good pool of datapoints for cross tabulation - which when counting combinations, can make your datapool dimish VERY quickly.
5. Who cares ? Well, me. Plus, I can start running what for me is the interesting analysies, what combinations of planets are found : for instance, how many tech 4 Pop A Starport E In worlds are there ?
Code:
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 262
SIZ
------------------
0 3968
1 8040
2 12348
3 16306
4 15582
5 15722
6 12140
7 7960
8 4972
9 1960
10 1004
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 263
ATM
------------------
0 19802
1 9370
2 11256
3 12216
4 11642
5 10394
6 8688
7 6664
8 4358
9 2722
10 1756
11 788
12 346
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 264
HYD
------------------
0 28000
1 8140
2 9316
3 10252
4 10494
5 9514
6 8018
7 6138
8 4350
9 2766
10 3014
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 265
POP
------------------
0 3976
1 8134
2 11968
3 15812
4 15978
5 16264
6 12030
7 7868
8 5022
9 1930
10 1020
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 266
GOV
------------------
0 19572
1 9296
2 11212
3 12210
4 11920
5 10506
6 8616
7 6504
8 4402
9 2776
10 1606
11 844
12 374
13 164
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 267
LAW
------------------
0 29302
1 9790
2 10262
3 10180
4 9436
5 8178
6 6762
7 5318
8 3948
9 2744
10 4082
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 268
TLv
------------------
0 5814
1 2202
2 4026
3 7750
4 10806
5 13242
6 14028
7 12570
8 10684
9 7862
10 5208
11 3010
12 1702
13 650
14 300
15 116
16 28
17 4
The SAS System 19:17 Thursday, January 24, 2008 269
PORT
--------------
A 2998
B 11752
C 25408
D 31128
E 22054
X 6662
------------
Ag 12590
------------
Ba 1126
------------
De 7396
------------
Fl 2740
------------
Ga 15436
------------
Hi 2950
------------
Ht 2800
------------
IC 6288
------------
In 618
------------
Lo 35914
------------
Lt 39864
------------
Na 10968
------------
NI 80186
------------
PO 22284
------------
Ri 4904
------------
Wa 2914
*for reference: Type I error False reject of null hypothesis.
Type II error False accept of null hypothesis.
Type III error Failure to avoid a math error
Type IV error: Failue to use the correct stat test.
Type V error: Failue to debug code .
Yes, iii-VI are what passes for stat humor.