Stilton at Dawn- Centauri/Narn Batrep
- Thread starter Slightly Norse John
- Start date
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
'Six Timbers' Reaverman said:
No you're missing the point, it is either AS relevant as not having fighters or poor turning which your buddy said (but you didn't criticise him funny.....) or they are all irrelevant in which case the ship has NO drawbacks....
In fact I have yet to see yourself/Burger/hash admit to being wrong
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
'Six Timbers' Reaverman said:
And that means I'm telling Lord David that he's wanting better ships? Nice try Reaverman :roll:
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Dread Pirate Burger said:
Thank you Burger! For saying you forgot it in the list of disadvantages
none of this would have happened were it not for Reaverman's desperate attempts to always be right!
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Dread Pirate Burger said:
here we go again, :roll: LDD has barely even posted, you guys have had issues with me ever since I entered an argument on the side of markn who you were tag-team baiting. Wonder why you get that name? maybe because it's true!? :roll:
emperorpenguin
Mongoose
Dread Pirate Burger said:
By that logic neither is lack of fighters or agility so your post was rubbish was it?
prelude_to_war
Mongoose
emperorpenguin said:berfing? what's that!?Captain David the Denied said:
That's when gangsta mom's have children; they give berf. Whichever day that ends up on becomes the child's berfday.
Sorry - couldn't resist - let the "Nuremberg Trial" flaming thread resume.
Firstly quite a cool report SNJ! and I quite agree with you - I've always felt Narn to be quite a bit disadvantaged at the higher PLs, most of the demo games I have played have been Centauri vs. Narn at about 5pt Battle level, with the emphasis on higher PL ships...Centauri rule there.
In fact I assumed that Centauri were just better...however I have been proved wrong on that account by getting my butt whiped by Narn skirmish ships on lower PL levels (5pt raid is v scary vs Narn).
Secondly...
Wow - didn't realise you felt that way, I will simply say that I don't believe that I have stubbornly or irrationally held a viewpoint simply for the sake of it and I will freely admit when I think I'm wrong...if you feel I have unjustly done so, please feel free to PM me and I will gladly discuss it with you. I do enjoy debate on these forums, even with Reaverman and Burger - check out this thread...
http://www.mongoosepublishing.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=20013&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15
Of course I have my opinions, likes and dislikes but am open to change on that, after all this is just a game right? That doesn't mean I will instantly accept someone else's point of view, on the contrary an exchange of experiences and viewpoints is quite healthy and something I very much enjoy on these boards. I suggest everyone take a few moments (or better yet a few hours) to consider their posts and try to stay on topic (apologies for this temporary sidetrack!) - this is just a game chaps and it is a bit silly to rant and rave about what essentially is grown men playing with "rocket ships". :wink:
In fact I assumed that Centauri were just better...however I have been proved wrong on that account by getting my butt whiped by Narn skirmish ships on lower PL levels (5pt raid is v scary vs Narn).
Secondly...
emperorpenguin said:
Wow - didn't realise you felt that way, I will simply say that I don't believe that I have stubbornly or irrationally held a viewpoint simply for the sake of it and I will freely admit when I think I'm wrong...if you feel I have unjustly done so, please feel free to PM me and I will gladly discuss it with you. I do enjoy debate on these forums, even with Reaverman and Burger - check out this thread...
http://www.mongoosepublishing.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=20013&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15
Of course I have my opinions, likes and dislikes but am open to change on that, after all this is just a game right? That doesn't mean I will instantly accept someone else's point of view, on the contrary an exchange of experiences and viewpoints is quite healthy and something I very much enjoy on these boards. I suggest everyone take a few moments (or better yet a few hours) to consider their posts and try to stay on topic (apologies for this temporary sidetrack!) - this is just a game chaps and it is a bit silly to rant and rave about what essentially is grown men playing with "rocket ships". :wink:
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
Once again, people are assuming I want the Prefect improved. When have I ever said it needs to be improved? Or even vaguely suggested it?
What I have said is that I don't see it as a problem. I don't consider it superior to any other Centauri ship at its PL. In fact I'd rarely use one. I prefer the Dargan at raid level because of its general utility. For my money the Prefect is fine as it is and doesn't need to be modified at all.
I will use it in more games to see if I'm wrong, however, but that's my opinion at this time.
What I have said is that I don't see it as a problem. I don't consider it superior to any other Centauri ship at its PL. In fact I'd rarely use one. I prefer the Dargan at raid level because of its general utility. For my money the Prefect is fine as it is and doesn't need to be modified at all.
I will use it in more games to see if I'm wrong, however, but that's my opinion at this time.
The Prefect absolutely rocks. I'd say its the best Raid level ship in the game at the moment. I'd take one over a Dargan any day, it has hull 6, more damage/crew and 50% stronger battle laser. The only disadvantages are no fighters, one less turn, no rear weapon, and a bit weaker side weapons. These disadvantages pale in signifigance compared to the advantages and can easily be overcome by fleet selection.
