Radiation and Ship Armour

SSWarlock

Mongoose
The Core Book states on pg 142 that starship armour decreases radiation exposure by 500. Does this mean 500 total regardless of how much armour is installed, 500 per level of armour (i.e. for every 5% of ship used for armour), or 500 per point of armour?
 
My testing has shown that the 500 rads absorbed per armour level ruling works rather well vs. both nuclear missiles and stellar flares. It just became a permanent house rule for my campaigns unless/until some better comes along.
 
SSWarlock said:
My testing has shown that the 500 rads absorbed per armour level ruling works rather well vs. both nuclear missiles and stellar flares. It just became a permanent house rule for my campaigns unless/until some better comes along.

So, how do you skim fuel? The radiation flux around larger Gas Giants is much higher than that.
 
Infojunky said:
So, how do you skim fuel? The radiation flux around larger Gas Giants is much higher than that.

How rads per hour could a ship expect around a gas giant? I think that's a rule that should be explained on future editions of MGT.

I'm glad the regular radiation rule was added in MGT. Other versions of Traveller; IIRC assume that the radiation from solar flares is blocked by the ships armor.

Mike
 
Re: gas giant radiation, I go with the ideas at the following website.

http://www.freelancetraveller.com/features/science/gasgiants.html

It provides enough detail to be interesting yet doesn't bog me down as a GM or player. No, it's not the ultimate in realism but then neither is Traveller. I go for "maximum game fun", not a simulation of reality.
 
qstor said:
Infojunky said:
So, how do you skim fuel? The radiation flux around larger Gas Giants is much higher than that.

How rads per hour could a ship expect around a gas giant?


The figure I can see is is in the 100,000 to 1,000,000 range. But that is a generalization.

Io gets an exposure of 3600 rem a day.

That and though the Protection factor of a substances is linear. It is generally list in the attenuation per not the gross reduction...

i.e. 1/500 per increment. not 500 subtracted per increment.

qstor said:
I think that's a rule that should be explained on future editions of MGT.

I would go for a correction and expansion.
 
Back
Top