Sigtrygg said:
The Imperial standard ACR - the Imperium insists on standardisation across the empire in order to simplify the supply chain.
An ACR purchased of Regina will quite happily use spare parts and fire ammo purchased on Efate, or even Terra for that matter.
You are missing the valuable point as far as standardization of weapons go. First I seriously doubt the ACR introduced in 789 is the same one that is made in 1100. That defies logic because minor tweaks and changes will be made over the course time. If they aren't then that means the Imperium is a static culture, much like it's predecessor which was destroyed by the Terrans. And the existing history and writeups of Imperium point towards an empire that is expanding and growing, both technologically and spatially.
The part, about parts being interchangeable, that should be true, to an extent. Some parts will be the same, but others cannot due to differences in the configurations and other changes. So, for example, your bolt and spring might remain the same across all models. But that may be the only difference (as in one model is standard assault rifle configuration, one may be bullpup, another may have different butt and barrel pieces. Just look at the evolution of automatic rifles and you'll see what I'm talking about).
And every weapons is going to be slightly different once you get to really know it. In the hands of a person who has no knowledge and very little skill they won't notice. When you change that up to the person who operates it, carries it, does the maintenance on it, sleeps with it, etc, they will know the difference. And as their skill level increases they will adjust their habits to accommodate the peculiarities of that weapon. It may be subtle, it may be a little more than subtle, but it is there. Notice how people at the height of their skills in sports like shooting or other sports, don't casually change their weapons out. Call it mental, physical, or whatever, but it's a very real part of the human condition.
paltrysum said:
phavoc said:
I would say that's not probable. Soldiers need to fight with the same weapons they have trained with. Plus there is a huge mental part to his as well. That rifle you take of is YOURS. That vehicle you maintain is YOURS. To an extent they are interchangeable, but to an extent they are not as well. Once you learn all the specific idiosyncrancies of YOUR thing you know how to deal with them in combat and you adapt to it without thinking about it.
Thanks for the insight on this. Very interesting points that will fuel any future merc campaigns.
Not a problem. As a former soldier you kind of learn these things.

I only used an M-16, grenade launcher and M-60 with any regularity (this was the day of iron sights only, none of that fancy-schmancy stuff they get today). Snipers and weapons with more advanced parts just escalate this issue. I consider it much like how an audiophile can hear the difference between stereo equipment that I cannot. For me the sound peaks out a certain level, aside from volume, and that's that. I can tell the difference between crappy & cheap, average, and really good. But I can't go above the really good level. Still, there is an noticeable difference. People who don't use weapons or military gear don't realize that, but maybe with the stereo explanation it will make more sense.