lol nothing to do with that. its the fact that i knew what i was talking about and made decent comments when at a tourney and matt put out 2e playtest stuff.
also if you came up with a good idea i would back it, i believe i have on other ideas of yours in other posts. has nothing to do with the person.
and I couldnt be further right on your crazy anti-defence ion cannons, how broken is that.
as for attacking people, i believe you started that.
like i said if you had a clue about the game perhaps you too could be a playtester instead of just whinging at me for putting down one of your ideas.
for people i "attack" well most of them i suggested for tier 2 playtesters. why? because i may argue with them but generally constructive stuff comes from it, unlike where you feel the need to insult me due to your obvious lack of intelligence and inability to create a productive argument.
"katadder talks out his ass because he thinks centauri ignoring all defences on a ship is broken"
i think you would find i am not the only one who thinks this.
if it was another tester or any other forum poster post the same as I did you would not have the same reaction.
CZuschlag said:
Oh, heck no. Absolutely not. I'll write up later why, but I don't look forward to Centauri being able to fire side guns on Emine mode as well as main guns on direct-fire mode at the same time on the same target. Extending all Centauri weapons another 3" doesn't make me happy, either.
Barf.
against one of your ideas, did he get abuse? no. you seem to have a problem with me, i dont know why and to be honest i dont care but I am one of the playtesters, live with it or complain to matt that you dont think I am good enough and move on

dont effect me. i do this because i like the game.
as a matter of interest most fleets interest me due to owning the big 5 plus 2 complete league fleets and parts of 2 more.