we are talking about enough energy to slag a MBT even at low power there is going to be distortion
this is what your fire control is for to attune the laser so it is unaffected by the atmosphere
running at 20 % of full power is a waste ,as your power plant can fire at full power and slag it's target with a grasing hit(why give the wounded a chance to fire back)
firing at 20% still costs the same fuel consumption as if your firing at 100%(fuel consumption is based on time not shots fired for energy weapons
this is what your fire control is for to attune the laser so it is unaffected by the atmosphere
running at 20 % of full power is a waste ,as your power plant can fire at full power and slag it's target with a grasing hit(why give the wounded a chance to fire back)
firing at 20% still costs the same fuel consumption as if your firing at 100%(fuel consumption is based on time not shots fired for energy weapons
Solomani666 said:rust said:I doubt it, mainly because a ship's laser fired through an atmosphere willSolomani666 said:A Fusion Y gun will have a larger damage radius than a ships pulse laser.
have a beam which will get wider with the distance to the target. If you
are looking for a way to reduce the damage of starship lasers, you could
rule that the damage declines with the atmosphere's density and the dis-
tance to the target.
1. No, lasers do not defocus that much through a atmosphere with relatively clear weather. Even a simple laser pointer will still make a small dot after travelling miles. Very powerful lasers cause their own atmospheric turbulance and are more likely to defocus. Which is a very good reason for a starship to use a lower power setting in an atmosphere.
2. If a ships laser beam got to be 5 meters wide at the target, it might be able to give a few troopers a tan at best, but it would not do any damage.