Burger said:Some poorly coded Windows web development applications will use \ instead of the correct version, /.
It was not poor coding, it was deliberate. MS wanted to set their own standard!
Burger said:Some poorly coded Windows web development applications will use \ instead of the correct version, /.
Without knowing which application was used to create the pages, I can't blame MS... it might have even been hand-typed, in which case it was the author's mistake (although Microsoft would be to blame for that by proxy, for conditioning the author to use \ instead of /)Reaverman said:Burger said:Some poorly coded Windows web development applications will use \ instead of the correct version, /.
It was not poor coding, it was deliberate. MS wanted to set their own standard!
You'd be surprised how many people use it...
Plus amongst students here, its growing in favor alot.
I'll take your word for it, but the sole solitary problem I've had with Firefox has been displaying the XML Shipviewer...Burger said:<geek>
Its nothing to do with XML. \ is a Windows path seperator, / is the standard internet path seperator. Some poorly coded Windows web development applications will use \ instead of the correct version, /.
Yes that may be true, but it doesn't take into account user type and habits. The majority of internet users simply use IE for accessing web sites and general browsing because it came with their PC from Dixons, and they don't want to or know how to change it. Those who visit forums tend to be (on average) more confident and knowlegable about the internet and computers in general. Therefore, are more likely to know about the existance of alternatives to IE, and therefore more likely to be Firefox users.Obsidian said:And you'd be surprised at how few... As a percentage of web usage by browser, firefox is hovering between 10 and 20 percent of the total amount.You'd be surprised how many people use it...
Burger said:From the responses in this thread, there do seem to be a fair few Firefox users on this forum, so my theory is at least plausible![]()
Microsoft.com said:system requirements
Below are the minimum requirements your computer needs to run Internet Explorer 7. Some components may require additional system resources not outlined below.
Internet Explorer 7 will run on Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2), Windows XP Professional x64 Edition, and Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1).
Minimum Requirements
Computer/Processor Computer with a 233MHz processor or higher (Pentium processor recommended)
Operating System Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2)
Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1)
Memory For Internet Explorer 7:
Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) - 87 MB
Windows XP Professional x64 Edition - 168 MB
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1) - 87 MB
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 ia64 - 218 MB
Drive CD-ROM drive (if installation is done from a CD-ROM)
Display Super VGA (800 x 600) or higher-resolution monitor with 256 colors
Peripherals Modem or Internet connection; Microsoft Mouse, Microsoft IntelliMouse, or compatible pointing device
I'll take your word for it, but the sole solitary problem I've had with Firefox has been displaying the XML Shipviewer...
I must admit I have given no thought to even looking at IE 7, but that might be because I do not know if it will run under Win 98, and I'm quite happy with Firefox (+IE plug-in).
Before you get all therapist on the firefox community you should check your own 'superiority complex' at the door. Hate to be rude but the arrogance of you post is astounding. Most people use IE not because they made some enlightened choice but because it came on the machine.