Kzinti Drone Test - Total Bust

Hi all! We got a few games in today to test out Kziniti drone fleets. Unfortunately, due to several issues (mainly, me being dumb :oops: ), we didn’t really get a good test of the “3 drone ship” rule. The plan was for me to play my Kzinti fleet vs Mckinstry’s Fed fleet in at least two games. Game 1 was to be by the normal rules and game 2 with (same fleets) the proposed 3 drone ship limit rule. As I mention below, we never got as far as the planned “game 2” so have no input on the 3 ship rule yet…sorry (I will try to get some games in this week).

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Even though we didn’t get a good test in, all the games were fun (well maybe not game 1 but at least it was educational :wink: ). I have provided my long winded ramblings of the three games below for anyone interested.

All three games were 1,000 points played on a 4x6 table. Mission was Rescue and I rolled up 7 pieces of terrain spread fairly evenly across the table.

Game 1:
I had 2 BC and 5 FF vs. Mckinstry’s Feds made up of 1 BCH, 6 DWD and 1 Burke.
I lost the set up roll off (something Ive yet to win in any of my games… :evil: )so in a fit of idiocy, I decided to split my fleet up (apparently, our sensors were tricked by the evil Feds and we registered the ships as klingons so I thought how clever it would be to get some nice rear shots on his ships with half my fleet ). Note to self: When setting up first vs 6 DWDs, stick together! :?

Well, on turn one, I backed up and did All Power to Shields (hoping to get the feds closer as my “flanking” force sped to rescue). Well Mckinstry moves up a bit and kills two of my FFs YIKES…those DWDs are crazy.

Its going to take at 1 more turn before my “flanking’ force can bring significant pressure on the feds and I only have 2 ships left in the force facing the entire Fed fleet . At that point, we decided to reset the game and move my ships all into the same area (assuming that I still lost the set up roll-off and had to set up first).

As an aside, while the DWD is heinous for its points, the death of my ships are only my fault. One, I think taking the Kzinti FF was a mistake. No ADD, 1 Disruptor at 15”, low shields, just not impressive for 120 points. On top of that, I should have attempted IDF instead of boosting my shields (of course I could have failed those but who knows). And again, splitting my fleet up after losing the set up roll against a drone heavy fleet was just a bonehead move :oops:

Game 2: (still keeping the rule as written for drones).
At this point, we lost focus on the 3 drone rule and wanted to see if its possible to mass against the DWD fleet and come out alive. Same fleets as above with me keeping my ships together. Turn 1, I move forward to get into disrupter range and successfully rolled 5 of my 7 ships for IDF. The feds deployed across from me and move up slightly as well and rolled 4-5 of his ships for IDF. At the end of turn 1, the feds had destroyed 1 of my Frigates and damaged a BC and another FF. I had managed to almost strip the shields of one of his DWDs with a few points of damage.

Neither game was really conclusive of anything except I don’t like the Kzinti FF as it stands now :shock: (I just don’t feel its worth 120 IMHO) and that the Fed DWD is crazy…I cant imagine facing 9 of those things (if they face a Drone, fleet, no worries…ADD racks are amazing, if they face a non-ADD fleet, its going to be painful for the other guy). Also, I should note in fairness to Mckinstry, I told him to take that Fed fleet as its something we both thought you might see at a tourney from a competitive player.

Game 3
Another player showed up and we decided to roll Kzinti vs. Klingons (still 1,000 points). I changed my fleet a bit and had: 2 BCs and 4 of the War Destroyers (really liked those ships this game).
He had:
1 C7
2 D5
1 D6
2 F5
1 E4

To prove that I was actually listening to Captain Jonah’s advice, I split my fleet up into two forces (1 BC and 2 DWs) about 2-3 feet apart (of course I lost the set up roll and had to set up first…. :cry: ). The Klingon (Joe) deployed all ships across from one of my forces. He closed fairly fast with this fleet using an asteroid field to hide from my “flanking” force as it approached. Ironicly, we weren’t playing the “3 ship drone” rule but due to terrain, and great maneuvering on Joe’s part, I only ever got one turn where I could fire 4 ships on one of his (D6). I destroyed it but it was a goner regardless…no ADD remaining, some previous shield damage and 1 rear-arc shot AND my BC which was about to be blow up, moved to within 1.5 inches of it to get crazy kill zone shots and overloaded disruptors…(that was fun!).

Anyway, it was a good game of maneuver. The splitting up against Klingons was good advice and paid off for me several times (although Joe does a great job of utilizing the terrain and his agility to offset this as much as possible).

By turn 4-5, I had lost one BC and had one DW disengage to his destroyed D6, E4, F5. Although I was slightly ahead on points, I think it was still anyone’s game. Unfortunately, it was getting late so we called it at that point.
 
I'll chime in on what I took away.

The first two today were with no modification to the drones, just to see if there is a problem. I think there was. The 1 BCH, 6 DWD, 1 FF fleet was more than capable of ripping the Kzinti and it was interesting in the second game in that it was the Kzinti trying to close and the Feds ducking back to keep the range open.

We both decided ahead of time to field a max cheese fleet but absent some changes to both drones and DWD's/BCJ's points (I don't see the BCH as the problem the other two are) the bottom line is, absent an ADD shield of at least two, why would a Fed take anything except BC's and DWD's except to fill in points. Maybe you can protect a couple of drone two ships but all the drone one ships, CA, OCL, NCL, FFB and FCA are relatively useless in a unlimited drone environment and won't get taken except on sentiment. The heavy DWD fleet is just plain boring and not much fun to play but it certainly handles the Kzinti. Given the drone restriction to three, I would have swapped three DWD's for two NCL's or an NCA and an OCL (just for grins) and had a more interesting if somewhat worse fleet.

Kzinti FF's suck. Four drones or not, at 120 with no ADD protection they were targets that when isolated, I could kill two a turn or when grouped with IDF up and running, I had to settle for killing one a turn. The Kzinti War Destroyer at 150 was much nastier.

Is anyone taking the Fed CA or CC? Running numbers on putting fleets together to fight the Kzinti, I could under no circumstances find a way to use one under any logical basis.
 
When you speak of the Fed BCH, you should really specify whether it's the BCG (drones), BCF (plasma) or BCJ (photons).
 
Sgt_G said:
When you speak of the Fed BCH, you should really specify whether it's the BCG (drones), BCF (plasma) or BCJ (photons).

Hi Sgt G! He just took the basic BCH (thats what it says in the book at least). It had 4 drones (I dont see a BCG option...is that in the errata?). Does that make sense?
 
It should be, because in SFB & FedCmdr, it's the BCG, not BCH. I thought that was identified early on. {sigh}
 
Pavlov Grenadier said:
Hi all!

Even though we didn’t get a good test in, all the games were fun (well maybe not game 1 but at least it was educational :wink: ). I have provided my long winded ramblings of the three games below for anyone interested .

As it happens we are interested so please keep it up. :lol:

Pavlov Grenadier said:
Game 1:
I had 2 BC and 5 FF vs. Mckinstry’s Feds made up of 1 BCH, 6 DWD and 1 Burke.

I hope you were playing in a well ventilated room for this game, the smell of cheddar must have been overpowering. :wink:
It’s no wonder you had problems, 6 DWDs is hugely cheesy and they are ship for ship much more capable than the more expensive FFs. I though the plan was to demonstrate that unrestricted Drone focus was overpowered from the Kzinti point of view. :lol:

Still:

Pavlov Grenadier said:
Well, on turn one, I backed up and did All Power to Shields (hoping to get the feds closer as my “flanking” force sped to rescue). Well Mckinstry moves up a bit and kills two of my FFs YIKES…those DWDs are crazy.

Sort of proves the point after all. Even if they were FFs, that is still enough firepower to have taken down a tougher ship on turn one. :roll:

I did mention the FFs would go pop when caught, unfortunately facing another Drone heavy fleet they get caught very fast.

Pavlov Grenadier said:
At this point, we lost focus on the 3 drone rule and wanted to see if its possible to mass against the DWD fleet and come out alive. Same fleets as above with me keeping my ships together. Turn 1, I move forward to get into disrupter range and successfully rolled 5 of my 7 ships for IDF. The feds deployed across from me and move up slightly as well and rolled 4-5 of his ships for IDF. At the end of turn 1, the feds had destroyed 1 of my Frigates and damaged a BC and another FF. I had managed to almost strip the shields of one of his DWDs with a few points of damage.

More highlighting how badly priced the DWD is but also again demonstrating the Drone heavy fleet firepower if you had lost one ship and had two more damaged on turn one and even after 5 out of 7 ships made the IDF check.

The FF is a cheesy ship for use against low or non Drone fleets, against another Kzinti fleet or a Fed or Klingon High Drone fleet it will explode like popcorn. With the 3 ship limit it is now hereby extinct since they can no longer mass the firepower to be deadly and have too few other weapons to be of any use unless you have 120 points left in your fleet.

The CL is ok for skirmishing but very fragile if caught, the DW is a nice filler ship and tough enough to take some hits.

Still and all as long as you had fun


McKinstry said:
I'll chime in on what I took away.

The first two today were with no modification to the drones, just to see if there is a problem. I think there was. The 1 BCH, 6 DWD, 1 FF fleet was more than capable of ripping the Kzinti and it was interesting in the second game in that it was the Kzinti trying to close and the Feds ducking back to keep the range open.

The Feds are a good middle range fleet, Photons pack a good punch out to 15 and they have a lot of phasers, the fact that you were pulling a retrograde without even bothering with Photons says a lot about the problems with the DWD (Matt :lol: )

McKinstry said:
We both decided ahead of time to field a max cheese fleet but absent some changes to both drones and DWD's/BCJ's points (I don't see the BCH as the problem the other two are) the bottom line is, absent an ADD shield of at least two, why would a Fed take anything except BC's and DWD's except to fill in points. Maybe you can protect a couple of drone two ships but all the drone one ships, CA, OCL, NCL, FFB and FCA are relatively useless in a unlimited drone environment and won't get taken except on sentiment. The heavy DWD fleet is just plain boring and not much fun to play but it certainly handles the Kzinti. Given the drone restriction to three, I would have swapped three DWD's for two NCL's or an NCA and an OCL (just for grins) and had a more interesting if somewhat worse fleet.

Kzinti FF's suck. Four drones or not, at 120 with no ADD protection they were targets that when isolated, I could kill two a turn or when grouped with IDF up and running, I had to settle for killing one a turn. The Kzinti War Destroyer at 150 was much nastier.

Is anyone taking the Fed CA or CC? Running numbers on putting fleets together to fight the Kzinti, I could under no circumstances find a way to use one under any logical basis.

Well the Kzinti FF is designed to pick on low Drone fleets, against Fed with Drone 4 it is all but useless. It’s far more viable against the Plasma races, or it was before the 3 ship limit. Now it’s going to be about as common as the Fed Ca, the Gorn CL and a few other such myths unless you know ahead of time you are fighting Gorn.

I had suggested them as a Drone heavy fleet to test how nasty Drone heavy fleets were under the old rules. Which happened anyway just not in quite the way intended

Very few ships are viable against 6 DWDs though, dropping down to 3 DWDs in a squadron net is still nasty because of how under priced the DWD is (Yo Matt :lol: ).

Still as long as fun was had. :wink: :lol:
 
Pavlov Grenadier said:
YIKES…those DWDs are crazy.

...

As an aside, while the DWD is heinous for its points
...

I think taking the Kzinti FF was a mistake.

...the Fed DWD is crazy…

... (if they face a Drone, fleet, no worries…ADD racks are amazing, if they face a non-ADD fleet, its going to be painful for the other guy)...

...I told him to take that Fed fleet as its something we both thought you might see at a tourney from a competitive player.
Yeah, I'd say the Kzinti Frigate is clearly worse than the DWD. The DWD is ridiculous.

The point about BCH + DWD being what you should expect at a tournament is currently our expectation, too. We've been mostly avoiding using the DWD in our house games, because it's transparently ludicrous, but even after increasing the BCH's point value for our own matches, it's still a staple vessel.

As you say, the dual-purpose drone racks are amazing whether or not you're against a drone fleet. If you're against a non-drone fleet (Gorn and Romulans) the drones themselves are very good. If you're against a Kzinti fleet, you don't have to worry about drones (and can chuck drones of your own provided you have some IDF or have a ship or two down the initiative chart that doesn't get shot at much).

I don't feel that the points value really reflects that.
 
Upping the points on the DWD to 130 helps but it doesn't change the ability in an unlimited drone environment to bend the game away from its' intended flow which really should be occuring from 24" and in.

I do think the value of drones should not be simply linear. One drone, even a Fed ADD/drone is fairly useless, two has some utility but still limited while four is almost exponentially better. I'd see one regular drone as worth maybe 5, two as worth 20 and four as worth 60 with the Fed combo drones as 1.5 of the regular thus (rounding up), a single Fed drone as worth 10, two as worth 30 and 4 as worth 90. (maybe a bit high but?) For the others, I'd price the ADD separately as unlike the Feds, the other races that have them can use them without giving up their offensive ability. I would also price the ADD trait almost exponentially as well since one is of limited utility, two is more than twice as good and 3+ onward at some increasing multiple above the simple arithmatic.
 
Ok, I am traveling for business this week and am going to try to run some solo test games while sitting in the hotel room at night (unless anyone lives in Chattanooga, TN? :?: ). For the solo games, I have plenty of counters, terrain and a 4x6 "table" I can play on (brought my black felt mat with me to lay on the hotel bed as my table :shock: ).

Anyway, what I would like from you guys are some sample 1k fleets you might take to a tourney (anything but the Fed 9 DWD fleet.... :oops: ). Since Im playing solo, and some of the fleets will be new to me, I know that it wont be the most scientific tests but just getting the fleets on the "table" and rolling some dice may show some patterns I can report back to the group with. I plan on playing the scenarios listed in the April Tourney in this forum so keep that in mind as you devise your best 1k point list.

I'll be playing with the 3 drone ship limit and see how that goes.

Thanks!
 
Totenkopf said:
PG you want cheese or competitive fleet lists?

Wait, theres a difference? :lol:

Thats a good question...Hmmm...how about something you would take to a tourney. So im sure a slight wiff of cheddar would be fine but nothing that would cause you not to look your opponent in the eyes :wink: . Does that make sense?
 
Pavlov Grenadier said:
Totenkopf said:
PG you want cheese or competitive fleet lists?

Wait, theres a difference? :lol:

Thats a good question...Hmmm...how about something you would take to a tourney. So im sure a slight wiff of cheddar would be fine but nothing that would cause you not to look your opponent in the eyes :wink: . Does that make sense?

Just checking.
 
Back
Top