How would they know? The spin detected is random and so meaningless on its own.
I doubt either of us have enough of a quantum physics background to really debate this, so I'll leave it to the sources cited. Which say information is still constrained by light speed.
My firsthand knowledge of this is from too long ago to matter., so take it with a dump truck full of salt. I haven't been active in the field since college, but I am aware of no math that says that information is constrained by the speed of light, methods of transmitting that information, yes, but the actual information itself, not unless there is something new in the last 30+ years in relation to this that I am unaware of.
It can't be random if they can use it for doing calculations. If it is truly random, then you cannot have a logicgate, but this "computer" does, separated by 6 feet of space. Our understanding of this science is still quite limited, but some things must be true in order for it to be used for quantum computing.
Ah.
I’m no expert in this, but the qbits are in close proximity and the information can be passed back and sense made of the calculations.
Ahhh! Okay. You are correct. That is My issue. Thank you for helping Me understand that better.
Yeah. I am out of My depth as well. I just liked the article and found it interesting.
So, basically, the information is transmitted faster than light, but since We can't understand it until we are told when to measure it, it is still limited by slower than light communication.Here is a link.
Can entangled particles communicate faster than light?
Entanglement is perhaps one of the most confusing aspects of quantum mechanics. On its surface, entanglement allows particles to communicate over vast distances instantly, apparently violating the speed of light. But while entangled particles are connected, they don't necessarily share...phys.org
This is one of the major arguments in physics, and most get it wrong, fortunatel another video just dropped that will help:
Retrocausality is proof that we have no understanding of what is happening in the real world when we apply quantum maths. It leads to paradox.
They are entangled, if you know the spin of one of them you know the spin of both... but
The act of observation or measurement breaks entanglement, as soon as you obsevre partice 1 tou know the properties of particle 2 but they are no longer "entangled" entangled.
It means the other is "up", but since from your point of view it is random you can't send information this way.
Sums up our current understanding of how it all works, we know it does, we just don't know how.
That is pretty cool. It takes time for them to become entangled, but how long does it take once they are already entangled?
I think the change in state is still instantaneous. It's only the initiation of that connection that takes time.
The change of one of the linked pair changing spin if the other is measured. Like I said, I know very little about this and could be completely wrong.
If you want to go that route. Use the Hop Drive TL progression for your jumpspace radio's range. As long as it still takes a week for the message to get there, then it wouldn't break the setting.
