EFTF command squad stat card

zlatan

Mongoose
Hey sorry if this has been asked before but im new so forgive me plz :P well has anyone got a copy of hiromoons stat card of the EFTF command squad and warrior thanks Nick
 
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a89/hiromoon/BF-EV%20Card%20Porject/EFTFBritCommandFinalmk2.jpg
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a89/hiromoon/BF-EV%20Card%20Porject/EFTFWarriorFinal.jpg
 
zlatan said:
Thanks guys but in a report i read in S+P it says the warrior can kill an abrams how ?

I dunno, I've never seen the Abrams stats, but since there are very few things that a D10 can't at least knock a hit point off of, maybe it means kill rather than 1 shot kill.

LBH
 
Hey Hiromoon,

Love the cards, although I was thinking that a more apt subtext for the officer card would be "Lister, general's don't smash chairs over people's heads, they don't get Newcastle Brown bottles stick them in your face and say 'stitch that Jimmy'." (Red Dwarf Season 3 Marooned).

Just a quick question, are both cards in the box? I would hope and assume so but I haven't actually seen anything that says that.
 
I thought I read somewhere the Kill score of 13 was an error as well. That it was more in the 10-11 range of things. Anybody know for sure?
 
kill is indeed 10

warrior can potentualy kill an abramh with some lucky dice, 2D10 1st action 2D10 second action and 2D10 for a 3rd bonus action from command unit. possable but not relaible.

both cards are in the box set.
 
Thanks for that. A kill score of 10 is more realistic I think, also means that the Type 99 and RPGs can potentially instantly kill the APC, somehow making the warrior invulnerable to all but DU rounds from an Abrams or a challenger seemed fantastic.
 
Gibbs said:
Mr Evil said:
bassicly its a light tank
That can carry troops to boot!

Or in the boot as the Brits might say. :wink:

Did I get that right, trying to make a double-entendre with a foreign term might not work so well. I am aware our "trunk" is your "boot" and these are both usually in the tail-end of most of our vehicles. So, trying to make a joke of the fact we throw our infantry in the back or "boot" of our APC tracks.
 
Shadow4ce said:
Or in the boot as the Brits might say. :wink:

Did I get that right, trying to make a double-entendre with a foreign term might not work so well. I am aware our "trunk" is your "boot" and these are both usually in the tail-end of most of our vehicles. So, trying to make a joke of the fact we throw our infantry in the back or "boot" of our APC tracks.

Dude, you ruined it with that explanation... :wink:
 
Shadow4ce said:
Gibbs said:
Mr Evil said:
bassicly its a light tank
That can carry troops to boot!

Or in the boot as the Brits might say. :wink:

Did I get that right, trying to make a double-entendre with a foreign term might not work so well. I am aware our "trunk" is your "boot" and these are both usually in the tail-end of most of our vehicles. So, trying to make a joke of the fact we throw our infantry in the back or "boot" of our APC tracks.

Yeah i got it! Good effort :lol:
 
Ha!

Down under we just call it the back. Occasionally the terms boot and trunk maybe used but it's just the back.


Gotta love the warrior, good armour, good weapons, troop carrier, if only they were available individually...
 
also sorry for another question but you guys are so helpful so i couldent help myself :) some guns say it minus 1,2,3 off armour roles does this also apply to tanks?
 
zlatan said:
also sorry for another question but you guys are so helpful so i couldent help myself :) some guns say it minus 1,2,3 off armour roles does this also apply to tanks?

Yes, as far as I am aware it does (well haven't seen anything to say it doesn't).
 
As the good people at mongoose always say: "Play the rules as written" if it says minus 4 to amour saves then that is to any armour save, like wise with ones, twos and threes.
 
Back
Top