Early M-Drive?

I had a go at understanding it.

What seems involved is to interact with the environment, without giving up something physical.

This interaction creates pressure, which translates into thrust.

In Traveller, it's using energy to turn into thrust.

Here, I'm not sure either how much thrust should be created, nor how, since static electricity doesn't seem a means to do so.
 
I will go out on a limb and predict this will be debunked in exactly the same way as the EM drive and every other "new physics" idea for "reactionless" drives...
 
I will go out on a limb and predict this will be debunked in exactly the same way as the EM drive and every other "new physics" idea for "reactionless" drives...
One of those low, thick limbs that can be reached without jumping and is sturdy enough for you, the wife and kids to sit on while enjoying a slight breeze and shade.
 
If we ever crack rapid transit from place to place in this universe I am of the opinion that it will be based on "manipulating dimensions" rather than trying to find loopholes in classical, quantum, and general relativity physics.

We don't even know what an electron really is... and it gets worse when searching for an ontological explanation for quarks, gluons etc.
 
I'm still not convinced that co-location isn't possible with the right understanding of physics and the right equipment. I will never see it happen, but oh well.
 
Take a light-weight metallic plate with electrodes on the left and right side of the plate.

Attach a plate of the strongest diamagnetic material to the top of the metallic plate.

Clip wires to the electrodes on the metallic plate.

Run a current through the wires.

If the current creates a magnetic field that the diamagnetic material repels from and the repulsive field is strong enough to lift the diamagnetic material away from the magnetic field, and the metallic plate is light enough, it should go flying off into the sky.

This is plausible. We just don't know how to control it.

You can see an example of this by taking 2 magnets and holding them together. If you have it one direction, the magnets will stick to each other. If you turn one the other direction, it will repel from the other. Then let go of the one on top. Did you see it go flying off? We just have to learn how control it.

But it 'produces' no thrust to go flying off, does it?
 
Yeah, this has all the components of a bunkum drive.

Mind you, I have an idea for a propellant-less drive that might work; but it kind of sucks. It does NOT involve random no-name engineers discovering a 'new fundamental force' that theoretical physicists have accidentally all overlooked. I still regard it as a bit kooky.

On a related note: Does anyone here know enough electroweak physics to be able to answer amateur questions about vacuum energy?
 
Last edited:
Depending of the questions and the intricacy of the reply, probably.

What are they?

First: my (very over-simplified and probably incorrect) understanding:
Vacuum is not empty; there is energy present. That energy represents an infinite number of possible wavelengths. Virtual particle pairs (matter and anti-matter counterparts) constantly emerge -- for nearly infinitesimal times -- and disappear as a result of that energy.

'Casimir Gaps', constructed of extremely parallel conductive plates placed very close together, demonstrate this by creating a region between the plates where certain wavelengths are 'forbidden'. Since there are fewer particle-antiparticle virtual pairs between the plates than outside them, there is a small pressure which pushes the plates together.

Second: questions
The vacuum energy is always present; but apparently not always equal -- the region between the plates is 'impoverished', as one example. Is there a way to enrich a region of space with additional energy?

Certain wavelengths of virtual energy are excluded from between Casimir plates -- what is the energy distribution / spectrum of those wavelengths? Is this just a black-body spectrum?

Third: conjecture
If it is possible to enrich the vacuum energy (by, for example, creating a very strong magnetic field), while simultaneously restricting the wavelengths to very short values, then a drive is possible. Create a region (which is in a strong magnetic field) which is very likely to manifest (restricted to very short wavelengths) B mesons, where the matter and anti-matter particles are different and have different decay paths. The magnetic field imparts (and picks up) a small momentum on each particle in a pair & their decay products. The pairs tend to be aligned because of the magnetic field, and the differential in imparted momentum is your driving force.

It would seem stronger magnets would provide more noticeable results.

At best, this would provide an extremely tiny but non-zero force. Like I said -- it is a bit kooky.
 
Last edited:
It's conceivable that something might be found that uses the Earth's magnetic field in some way. That won't be a reactionless drive, though.

There's also effects that can create a pressure differential in the atmosphere from current, although as far as I know it's pretty weak compared to a propeller. You won't be seeing it replace prop drones anytime soon.

Getting stuff into orbit efficiently without rockets is a big deal, but it's more likely that clever reaction based solutions will be found before anything reactionless is.
 
Solar sailing, or, sailing in general, taps into an existing force, and captures it, converting it to propulsion.

Which is what manoeuvre drives do, but on gravity waves.


tumblr_o2fdjyXbhS1v7xc3qo6_500.gifv
 
Surfing is basically using one force (gravity) with another force (the wave energy) to create a vector along the interface. We pretend that M-Drives work better in a gravity well, but in reality it's probably the other way around - possibly it could be made to work at a sufficient distance away from two or more massive bodies.

Gravity waves are extremely weak compared to being close to a massive body.

Solar sailing is another matter.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top