CaptainClark
Mongoose
Alright, this may seem like a silly question, but it came up in a game recently and is based on the wording of a rule vs. what people feel the spirit should be.
The question is:
Is dodge taken per Attack, or per Hit?
1. Per Hit, which is acctually what is written, would be like Interceptors, rolling vs. each dice that hits. It means dodge isn't all that useful (but much better then nothing, obviously!) and makes me wonder if Fighters and/or Whitestars are all that survivable afterall.
2. Per attack, would be somewhat more like Adaptive Armour and GEG, which would make Dodge incredibly powerful and useful, and feels more right (either you dodge an attack or you don't, you normally don't just dodge part of an attack). That said, this DOES seem too powerful.
As I said, it came up as a rules question the other night during a game, which lead to quite a long debate (which of course, is somewhat game disruptive). As written, I'm assuming it should be interpretted as the first, but would like clarrification for future reference and to avoid future debates.
(and I just realised this should probably have been in "Rulemasters". My apologies!)
The question is:
Is dodge taken per Attack, or per Hit?
1. Per Hit, which is acctually what is written, would be like Interceptors, rolling vs. each dice that hits. It means dodge isn't all that useful (but much better then nothing, obviously!) and makes me wonder if Fighters and/or Whitestars are all that survivable afterall.
2. Per attack, would be somewhat more like Adaptive Armour and GEG, which would make Dodge incredibly powerful and useful, and feels more right (either you dodge an attack or you don't, you normally don't just dodge part of an attack). That said, this DOES seem too powerful.
As I said, it came up as a rules question the other night during a game, which lead to quite a long debate (which of course, is somewhat game disruptive). As written, I'm assuming it should be interpretted as the first, but would like clarrification for future reference and to avoid future debates.
(and I just realised this should probably have been in "Rulemasters". My apologies!)