If someone is on trial for physically assaulting Children without specified act or acts and the majority of The Jury know that he is innocent of the actual physical act or acts he's accused but that he is guilty of acts of physical child abuse that no one other then they and the defendant know about can they, if found out, justify finding him guilty, regardless of the evidence, of unspecified acts of child abuse because they know that he's innocent of the 10 or so he's accused of but also know that he's guilty of committing more then 30 that have never been reported?
Can't say anything else without risking giving away most of the plot of A Traveller Campaign that's basically CSI on the scale of A Star System rather then A American County that I'm preparing but may never play.
Can't say anything else without risking giving away most of the plot of A Traveller Campaign that's basically CSI on the scale of A Star System rather then A American County that I'm preparing but may never play.