Supplement Four
Mongoose
throrII said:It is a city based encounter book.
If true, I think I'll be disappointed in it once I see it.
I'll reserve judgement until then.
throrII said:It is a city based encounter book.
I have bought all Conan books up until now but if Cities is indeed only an encounter book then this may be the first book I'll pass on buying, which is a shame but I really can't find any use for a cities encounters book in my group.
Hervé said:MGBM wrote:
I also have all the Mongoose Conan books and I'll most certainly be getting that one too. I bet it can't be worse than Tito's... :wink:
Supplement Four said:Hervé said:MGBM wrote:
I also have all the Mongoose Conan books and I'll most certainly be getting that one too. I bet it can't be worse than Tito's... :wink:
What's wrong with Tito's? I bought it. I haven't spent a lot of time with it, but it's a book of equipment, right?
I have noted that it's not as illustrated as I'd like it to be. But, it does include the weapons and equipment from the main book.
Wait...don't tell me that's all it includes...I haven't looked at it that closely. There is new equipment in Tito's, isn't there? Stuff not in the main book?
Strom said:Even with indexes, I can't take all the books with me.
Strom said:Ah, but do you have all of the Conan RPG books?
:lol:
Strom said:If your buying all the books Titos is a lot of cut and paste. The advantage is all that info under one book, which is a big advantage for some - like me. Even with indexes, I can't take all the books with me.
Same here. And recently, I liked the approach of Sorcerer & Sword, where weapons are only rated as being edged/bludgeon, and for the tactical advantages they provide (e.g. in melee, a short weapon has advantage over a long/heavy one). Simple, true to the source and, perhaps, even more realistic.Hervé said:I prefer the way weapons are handled in games like Warhammer, where all weapons of about the same size (swords, axe or hammers...) do the same amount of damage. It's a less "gamist" approach which is more to my gaming group liking. We just hate "crunching numbers" in RPGs, hence our dislike of the D20 system...
The King said:It doesn't seem to be a Quilliams Artwork though.
In fact I didn't recognize your "touch" there.cquilliams said:The King said:It doesn't seem to be a Quilliams Artwork though.
Yes it is my cover, I certainly think it could have turned out better, I'm a little disappointed but I do plan to do some repainting sometime in the future. Especially some of the main figures including Conan. It will be done just for the purpose of personal satisfaction.
Chris Q