waldronbob350
Mongoose
im ok with that
Campaign on Vassal
- Thread starter Lord David the Denied
- Start date
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
Go ahead and post it. We just have one outstanding fleet to be submitted, as far as I know.
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
Doesn't seem to have a download link there... :?
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
I just eye-balled the background PDF. Nice work, but there's a problem. You listed the campaign date as 2268, when it should read 2262...
and if you at 2262 the ISA has a total of one ship to choose from plus allies 
which will be fun
ISA in service dates:
WSC-2:2267
WS carrier: 2270
WS gunship: 2271
WS fighter: 2270
Victory: 2266
gonna be fun for the ISA player, having whitestars plus allies unless you giving him leeway
which will be fun ISA in service dates:
WSC-2:2267
WS carrier: 2270
WS gunship: 2271
WS fighter: 2270
Victory: 2266
gonna be fun for the ISA player, having whitestars plus allies
unless you giving him leewayLord David the Denied
Mongoose
2262 was agreed at the beginning. Besides, there are no counters and stats on Vassal for most of those ships.
Still, if everyone wants to change to 2268 I suppose we can. That would mean the EA fleet would have to come from the Crusade era list, though, so that's extra work.
Still, if everyone wants to change to 2268 I suppose we can. That would mean the EA fleet would have to come from the Crusade era list, though, so that's extra work.
Del Putani
Mongoose
Is it too late to join the game?
Another awkward matter, i'm a noob at the game and the program.
This would give me the opportunity to learn of course...
Fred
Another awkward matter, i'm a noob at the game and the program.
This would give me the opportunity to learn of course...
Fred
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
Del Putani said:
We've got all the players we need at the moment. Keep an eye out in case anyone has to drop out suddenly.
Triggy said:
Going to 2268 is going to make people want Armageddon units, though, and we don't have stats and counters for them in Vassal. One of the reasons I picked 2262 originally.
prelude_to_war
Mongoose
I don't mind switching but to LDTD's point, we'd have to wait until Arma arrived...shall we wait?
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
We know the rules changes, and that was what we were waiting for. I have no idea how long it will take to see Vassal updated with the new ships and stats, so it's probably better that we stay at 2262 and just play with the modified stats so far as we know them.
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
Locarno, you've labelled my flagship as an "Octavian-class battleship" when it is, in fact, an Octurion-class battleship. Also, you didn't list the names I provided for each ship.
I'll correct the classes. I've spotted a couple of other typos (e.g. the brikorta is a light carrier..) I'll get them corrected.
Since virtually no-one else bothered naming their fleet (minor glower), I left it as just the flagship in the initial lists. Rest assured to those who did that I've got all your names on my fleet list and they'll be used in any updates and battle reports where a specific ship is involved....
Since virtually no-one else bothered naming their fleet (minor glower), I left it as just the flagship in the initial lists. Rest assured to those who did that I've got all your names on my fleet list and they'll be used in any updates and battle reports where a specific ship is involved....
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
Sweet. Nice work with all this. You're a good sport. 8)
Lord David the Denied
Mongoose
Where's our ISA man, then?
