Bridge tonnage discrepancy

Ezarhon

Mongoose
I used both these books to create a Ship and found a Bridge tonnage discrepancy between them at the 100Ton range. Which one is considered official? 1753191872052.png
 
I used both these books to create a Ship and found a Bridge tonnage discrepancy between them at the 100Ton range. Which one is considered official? View attachment 5376
Funny thing is I made that exact change for my Universe just because I didn't like the bridge size break being 100 instead of the tonnage ending in 1 for the other start ranges. Makes your scout ship/seeker have a little extra cargo, even more with a small bridge.

Now those ships are legal!
 
Last edited:
Being a small cramped ship? Seems to fit the 3 ton Bridge of a Scout, even more so a Seeker.

Of course for my campaign setup the "Empire" has switched to a 180 ton TL 11 3g J-2 Explorer with various hull types for different missions (all with basic stealth, some with a 100 ton module). Versions without the stealth fulfilling Survey and courier roles inside the Empire (and their Trade Alliances outside the Empire). All of which are commonly used when sold off for trade and other uses.
 
Hmmm, both Scout ships in the 2022 update have a listed 10 ton bridge, which, if a 6 ton Bridge is now standard to a 100 ton hull, gives the 2 ships 4 extra tons of cargo space each. So yeah. It looks like the 2024 rules needs an update....
 
Hmmm, both Scout ships in the 2022 update have a listed 10 ton bridge, which, if a 6 ton Bridge is now standard to a 100 ton hull, gives the 2 ships 4 extra tons of cargo space each. So yeah. It looks like the 2024 rules needs an update....
As they should according to the HG'22 system:
Skärmavbild 2025-07-22 kl. 21.44.png
HG'22, p19.


Apparently Core'24 changes that, and perhaps the standard ships such as the Scout?
 
Feature creep is a sad ever present element in Traveller since day 1 in '77. Each new 'update' breaks something somewhere. Still tho, we do keep buying each new shiny book that gets published so more of the same then, sticky notes plastered over already outdated tables. ;-)
 
Either someone didn't look at the new table prior to including ship examples, or someone typo'd the 100 ton spot on the Core table, because the scout variants in the new Core book all have ten ton bridges, consistent with HG'22.
 
Either someone didn't look at the new table prior to including ship examples, or someone typo'd the 100 ton spot on the Core table, because the scout variants in the new Core book all have ten ton bridges, consistent with HG'22.
One thing that Marc did do well was QC. Once he nerfed a rule it stayed nerfed... well till he nerfed it again that is...
 
Either someone didn't look at the new table prior to including ship examples, or someone typo'd the 100 ton spot on the Core table, because the scout variants in the new Core book all have ten ton bridges, consistent with HG'22.
@MongooseMatt said the table is correct in the 24 Core rulebook Update. Seems that no one fixed the ships.
 
Back
Top