Nialldubh said:
That would mean then he could take a move back to Conan on his turn and Attack ?
You see? This is why I post this stuff here. I thought I had all the bases covered with that one--had thought of everything--and then you spring this on me!
Good catch!
Let's see:
If Conan has initiative and attacks the Vanir, the Vanir fails in his parry, and Conan damages him, the Vanir can take a 5 foot step directly backwards. Conan can choose to follow as a free action. If Conan doesn't follow, then the Vanir, as you say, can use his five foot step (since his movement with the maneuver was an immediate action, and immediate actions are free actions) to just approach Conan and use his attack on his turn.
I do think that the movement for the maneuver should be an immediate action, but I also see your point--in that it's counter intuitive for the Vanir to be pushed back buy the attack but then reverse direction.
Is it an "issue" though? Conan decided not to continue with the press, so why wouldn't the Vanir step back up to fight him, then?
I think I'm OK with that. If Conan wants to continue the press, he can, by using his free action to keep step with the Vanir. If Conan stops the press, then the Vanir is free to use his normal five foot step to close and continue the fight.
The result is that we get movement on the battlefield--the battlefield dance, so to speak--so, I think we're in good shape.
But, he doesn't rob himself of an attack as I indicated, does he? Nope, he doesn't. I kind of liked that feature of the maneuver.
If I include that the character must have initiative in order to do the maneuver, then we're back in business. Because the Vanir would attack, and then move when he failed his parry against Conan's counter attack.
I didn't include nish as part of the prerequisite on this one because it seemed counter intuitive to "giving ground". If someone is forcing your back with thier blows, they've probably got the initiative, not you.
Then, otoh, maybe you have to have the initiative in order to be able to react defensively so--otherwise, you freeze and your opponent moves in ot cream you.
So, I could leave it as-is, or throw in that the defender doing this maneuver must have initiative.
Your thoughts?
CIRCLE STEP combat maneuver: you not think there should be some prerequisite for this manoeuvre like Dodge Feat ?
No, I didn't want to put any prerequisites like that onto these two maneuvers. Prerequisties are only triggers signaling when they can be used (failing a parry, or having initiative and attacking).
I want these two manevuers to be basic maneuvers that all fighters are taught (or pick up quickly), useable from 1st level on. The first thing a fighter is taught, usually, is to move his feet and not be a standing target. That's what these maneuvers are all about--small benefit and simulated movement on the battlefield.