[ACTA] When do we get an Armageddon FAQ?

[Fin-man]

I've noticed several Armageddon-related questions on this forum after the release of the Armageddon book, as well as some rules questions from Sky Full of Stars that were never addressed. (Ships targeting Shadows & Vorlons needing to beat their hull value comes to mind.)

Though having answers to some of these questions on the forums is nice, having it compiled in one place where you could print it all out and bring it with you would be preferred. When will Mongoose be putting together an Armageddon FAQ in their download section? Matt?

Fin-man

 

[Locutus9956]

Erm just so you know it was rulesmastered that vorlon and shadow hull values are the same as everyone elses and the 'beat their value' wording was simply a mistake (also worth noting that the lists in SFoS are replaced anyway so its kind of a moot point).

That said, an Arma FAQ/Errata WOULD be good.

 

[Reaverman]

Erm just so you know it was rulesmastered that vorlon and shadow hull values are the same as everyone elses and the 'beat their value' wording was simply a mistake (also worth noting that the lists in SFoS are replaced anyway so its kind of a moot point).

That said, an Arma FAQ/Errata WOULD be good.

Its a new sourcebook call, "Armageddingit?"

 

[Fin-man]

Yes sir, I know. I was the one who originally posted the question to the forums. However, that particular point is not moot because:

1) The Armageddon re-do of the Vorlons / Shadows only adressed the ship stats, and a few minor tweaks such as fighters. The remainder of the rules from Sky Full of Stars are still in use. (Armageddon rulebook, P. 80)

2) The particular question was asked and answered six months ago, and was not (for some reason) included in Armageddon or in the SFoS FAQ for that matter.

3) The original post with the question and response is no longer on the boards.

4) A person who is playing the Shadows / Vorlons and who read the SFoS rulebook shouldn't have to hear an answer of, "Well, Matt said it wasn't really that way on an Internet forum. No, really. I read it."

I like Mongoose - it's a good company with a good heart. But when you see things like this, identified by their players and answered - how hard is it to make a note to put that in a FAQ in PDF format? I mean, really?

Matt, please let us know if Mongoose is going to do a FAQ for the Armageddon items, plus the other rules clarifications / corrections that were missed the first time around.

Fin-man

Erm just so you know it was rulesmastered that vorlon and shadow hull values are the same as everyone elses and the 'beat their value' wording was simply a mistake (also worth noting that the lists in SFoS are replaced anyway so its kind of a moot point).

That said, an Arma FAQ/Errata WOULD be good.

 

[Ripple]

Amen brother...

Would be nice to get all those old ruling, especially since they don't even exist here anymore.

Ripple

 

[Fin-man]

**Bump**

 

[Fin-man]

**The official one-month bump**

Matt, where are you?

 

[MongooseMatt]

Here, I'm here!!!

I'll sort something out this week. . .